Thanks sir On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Bernhard Rupp <hofkristall...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Unbiased positive omit* difference density, not just any fo-fc. > > Br > > On Dec 18, 2017 9:22 PM, "chenzhonghao...@163.com" < > chenzhonghao...@163.com> wrote: > > Dear Raj, > > Usually, fo-fc is the best way to show. > > > best, > > > ------------------------------ > chenzhonghao...@163.com > > > *From:* raj kumar <rajk13...@gmail.com> > *Date:* 2017-12-19 13:07 > *To:* CCP4BB <CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> > *Subject:* [ccp4bb] Electron density map for publications > Hi > Which electron density map (fo-fc or 2fo-fc) should I use for > representing the density of the bound ligand? > Thanks > Raj > > >
