ask again in 3-5 years. :-)
>
> Mark
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Boaz Shaanan
> To: CCP4BB
> Sent: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 2:53 pm
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources
>
> One of the main things (if not THE main thing) to worry about when
>
I can not really speak for a home-source setup, but here at the SLS MX
group we run two Pilatus6M (one of which is the first Pilatus ever made)
and one Pilatus2M. In nearly four years since we installed the first one
we never had any hardware issue other than users damaging the case. So
I'd say the
> -Original Message-
> From: Boaz Shaanan
> To: CCP4BB
> Sent: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 2:53 pm
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources
>
> One of the main things (if not THE main thing) to worry about when
> investing in such expensive equipment is lo
has fewer
moving parts and therefore should be expected to be more reliable. But I don't
know that for sure, please ask again in 3-5 years. :-)
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Boaz Shaanan
To: CCP4BB
Sent: Tue, Apr 30, 2013 2:53 pm
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources
: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 10:00 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] detectors on home sources
I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a core facility. The vendors are offering some new configurations. Whatever the claimed advantages/disadvantages, I'm h
The Excillum MetalJet (TM) source is technically very interesting, with
its liquid metal jet anode, but I have no idea how well it works for
typical in-house crystallography use.
On 04/30/13 15:00, Fareed Aboul-Ela wrote:
I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a
co
I'm involved in advising my institute on an X-ray home source for a core
facility. The vendors are offering some new configurations. Whatever the
claimed advantages/disadvantages, I'm hesitant to make a decision without
consulting someone with direct experience with them. In particular, has
anyon
