Re: [ccp4bb] clashscore question

2019-01-16 Thread Xiaodi Yu
problem in the future. Xiaodi From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of John Berrisford Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 12:06 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] clashscore question Dear Xiaodi The wwPDB validation service does indeed add

Re: [ccp4bb] clashscore question

2019-01-16 Thread John Berrisford
https://www.wwpdb.org/validation/validation-reports Regards John From: CCP4 bulletin board On Behalf Of Sharan Karade Sent: 16 January 2019 04:28 To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] clashscore question Dear Yu, I think pdb validation server add hydrogen to the structure an

Re: [ccp4bb] clashscore question

2019-01-15 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Xiaodi, Please read the PDB validation report for the individual clashes and see if these are symmetry or alternate related. If you have been playing around with atomic occupancies, this also affects which atoms are taken into account for the clashscore. Also, which hydrogen model did you us

Re: [ccp4bb] clashscore question

2019-01-15 Thread Sharan Karade
Dear Yu, I think pdb validation server add hydrogen to the structure and then calculate the clashscore. The other methods you mentioned calculate clashscore without adding hydrogen to the structure. Regards Sharan On Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 11:23 PM Xiaodi Yu Hi All: > > I have a pdb file and the c

[ccp4bb] clashscore question

2019-01-15 Thread Xiaodi Yu
Hi All: I have a pdb file and the clashscores reported from both phenix and MolProbity were around 5, while the clashscore from the pdb validation server is 17. I wonder what may cause the difference? Any suggestion is appreciated. Thank you. Xiaodi ###