Excellent.
Thanks a lot for the clarifications.
ciao,
s
On Jan 16, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Kay Diederichs
wrote:
> Sebastiano,
>
> CORRECT does scale the data. XSCALE is only needed for two or more datasets,
> or if other requirements exist - you named one.
>
> The two varieties of FRIEDEL'S_LAW
Sebastiano,
CORRECT does scale the data. XSCALE is only needed for two or more datasets, or
if other requirements exist - you named one.
The two varieties of FRIEDEL'S_LAW differ in their rejections!
HTH,
Kay
Sebastiano Pasqualato schrieb:
>
>Thanks to Kay and Tim or the feedback.
>
>The
On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Tim Gruene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Sebastiano,
>
> if the output of GO.COM produces an mtz-file you can use for phasing
> or refinement, I am very confident there is a scaling step involved.
Sorry, my bad.
I meant there's
The XDS CORRECT step will also (by default) do scaling - if I
understand correctly the same scaling as in XSCALE, but for a single
sweep and with no zero-dose.
If what you want is merging statistics, I find it helpful to write out
the data unmerged and then use pointless -c and aimless to merge th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Sebastiano,
if the output of GO.COM produces an mtz-file you can use for phasing
or refinement, I am very confident there is a scaling step involved.
This might also be an explanation for the discrepancy you point out:
With FRIEDEL'S_LAW=TRUE the
Thanks to Kay and Tim or the feedback.
The reason I wanted to get statistics from the CORRECT step of XDS is that I
have refined a structure using the mtz output by the GO.COM automatic reduction
routine of SLS beamline PXIII, which does not involve a scaling step (I
discovered recently).
I wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Sebastiano,
you could use xprep to get the statistics in user defined resolution
shells.
Out of curiosity: Would you mind sharing why you want to do this and
why you don't want to use the XSCALE statistics instead? The
statistics are probably mo
Dear Sebastiano,
sorry, it is not possible. Indeed, only XCSALE allows you to define the
resolution ranges yourself.
HTH,
Kay
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:22:14 +0100, Sebastiano Pasqualato
wrote:
>
>Hi all,
>I was wondering if XDS allows to change the number of resolution bins
>appearing in the
Hi all,
I was wondering if XDS allows to change the number of resolution bins appearing
in the table:
SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION
of CORRECT.LP.
Please, note that I am not referring to the table output by XSCALE, in which
you can change the res
