hanking you,
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> ARKO
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Soisson, Stephen M <
> stephen_sois...@merck.com> wrote:
> >> But if we were to follow that convention we would have been stuck with
> Mul
, or, quite
>> simply, MuRDER.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jacob
>> Keller
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:13 PM
>> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
>> Sub
But if we were to follow that convention we would have been stuck with
>> Multi-wavelength Resonant Diffraction Experimental Results, or, quite
>> simply, MuRDER.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.A
er
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:13 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK <mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Merging data collected at two different
wavelength
This begs the question* whether you want the lemmings to understand
you. One theory of langua
bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
> Jacob Keller
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:13 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Merging data collected at two different wavelength
>
> This begs the question* whether you want the lemmings to understa
t;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Jacob
> Keller
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:13 PM
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Merging data collected at two different wavelength
>
>
18, 2012 3:13 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Merging data collected at two different wavelength
This begs the question* whether you want the lemmings to understand
you. One theory of language, gotten more or less from Strunk and
White's Elements of Style, is that the
This begs the question* whether you want the lemmings to understand
you. One theory of language, gotten more or less from Strunk and
White's Elements of Style, is that the most important feature of
language is its transparency to the underlying thoughts. Bad language
breaks the transparency, remind
>
>> Can I be dogmatic about this ?
>
>I wish you could, but I don't think so, because even though those
>sources call it that, others don't. I agree with your thinking, but
>usage is usage.
And 10,000 lemmings can't be wrong?
> Can I be dogmatic about this ?
I wish you could, but I don't think so, because even though those
sources call it that, others don't. I agree with your thinking, but
usage is usage.
> a SAD experiment is a single wavelength experiment where you are using the
> anomalous/dispersive signals for ph
Can I be dogmatic about this ?
Multiwavelength anomalous diffraction from Hendrickson (1991) Science
Vol. 254 no. 5028 pp. 51-58
Multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) from the CCP4 proceedings
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/courses/proceedings/1997/j_smith/main.html
Multi-wavelength anomalous-
Hi,
Regardless of what the consensus on naming for the technique, I'd
suggest you combine these datasets during phasing (I'm aware of MLPHARE,
SHARP, PHASIT supporting multiple anomalous datasets during phasing;
others probably do as well). Combining at the merging step
(pointless/scalepack/
That is excellent! You refer obviously to the multiple anomalous
discussions on the bb? (Maybe d = disagreement?)
JPK
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:42 AM, D Bonsor wrote:
> Isn't it true that we cannot even agree on what MAD stands for?
>
> Is the following right?
>
> M = Multiple-wavelength. I thi
On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Tim Gruene wrote:
> Comments on the comments ;-):
Ditto
>
>> [...]
>>
>> By the way, I wouldn't use "MAD" to describe the mergeing of
>> non-isomorphous datasets.
> I agree, neither would I.
> Just to be on the save side and avoid confusion by less experienced
> r
Isn't it true that we cannot even agree on what MAD stands for?
Is the following right?
M = Multiple-wavelength. I think everyone agrees to this, although I
believe I've seen the occasional (and sometime non-sensical) variant
A = Anomalous (I think everyone agrees, although this term should
reall
> By the way, I wouldn't use "MAD" to describe the mergeing of non-isomorphous
> datasets. Strictly speaking, MAD is at least an attempt to measure both
> anomalous (f") and dispersive (f') differences, and I don't think it is
> appropriate to use the term "MAD" when you know the dispersive signal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Comments on the comments ;-):
On 01/18/2012 05:54 PM, James Holton wrote:
> [...]
> An important thing that is not done automatically, however, is to check
> if your space group has more than one indexing solution. Basically, if
> merohedral twinning
How to merge two or more runs depends on the software you used to
process the images. If you used MOSFLM/CCP4, then you would use the
programs REBATCH (perhaps REINDEX) and SORTMTZ to combine the unmerged
mtz files (the ones that come out of MOSFLM) before feeding them to
SCALA. My program Sc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Arko,
could you not try MAD with the two different data sets?
Otherwise you can check the strength of the anomalous signal for both
sets separately (I am sure pointless prints the anomalous CC over
resolution shell) and after merging them.
If the
Hi all,
I have two datasets, both CO SAD data, one collected at CO anomalous
wavelength at synchroton and the other at home source. I wish to combine
these two data-sets and use for SAD phasing. Can anyone suggest how this
can be done?
Regards,
ARKO
--
*ARKA CHAKRABORTY*
*CAS in Crystallogra
20 matches
Mail list logo
