---
>
> Da: Eleanor Dodson
> Inviato: lunedì 4 gennaio 2021 15:43:03
> A: Napolitano Silvia
> Cc: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Oggetto: Re: [ccp4bb] B-factors very high
>
> Well - you dont give the resolution of your data or the "
On 04/01/2021 14:38, Silvia Napolitano wrote:
Dear CCP4 Community,
I am currently working on the structure of a monomeric protein of 23KDa. The protein is
generally quite "loopy" and I think I am mid-way refinement.
At the moment I am struggling, among other things, with an extremely high
B-fac
Dear Silvia,
While high Bs can be a sign that parts of your model are incorrect (and
therefore some careful manual rebuilding may be required), for things like
poorly-ordered surface loops, they can simply be truth.
A point worth remembering for newbies: your goal is to produce the model that
.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] B-factors very high
Hmm - this is extracted from your log file: it looks more sensible..
2899: b_iso_mean = 66.62
2907: b_iso_min= 63.50 (limit = 1.00)
2908: b_iso_max= 68.13 (limit = 80.00)
2909: b_iso_mean = 66.62
The average B
---
> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Eleanor
> Dodson <176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 4, 2021 3:44:33 PM
> *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] B-factors very high
>
> That polygon is no
Dear Eleanor,
You are absolutely right.
However, in Polygon, you could compare the models selected by resolution, by
size, etc.
I use this occasion to wish you and others a happy New Year !
Sacha Urzhumtsev
- Le 4 Jan 21, à 15:44, Eleanor Dodson
<176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscma
*Da:* Eleanor Dodson
*Inviato:* lunedì 4 gennaio 2021 15:43:03
*A:* Napolitano Silvia
*Cc:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Oggetto:* Re: [ccp4bb] B-factors very high
Well - you dont give the resolution of your data or the "wilson B"
which will be recorded in the data processing log.
If the res
iscmail.ac.uk>
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 3:44:33 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] B-factors very high
That polygon is not very useful I dont think. The statistics need to be given
separately for structures solved at given resolutions.
Eleanor
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 14:43
That polygon is not very useful I dont think. The statistics need to be
given separately for structures solved at given resolutions.
Eleanor
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 14:43, Eleanor Dodson
wrote:
> Well - you dont give the resolution of your data or the "wilson B" which
> will be recorded in the dat
Well - you dont give the resolution of your data or the "wilson B" which
will be recorded in the data processing log.
If the resolution is 3A or less a) it is hard to refine a B value, and b)
it certainly should be high..
So more information is needed.
Eleanor
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 14:39, Silvia
10 matches
Mail list logo