Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer

2008-12-08 Thread Edward Snell
se Antonio Cuesta-Seijo Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 12:54 PM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer I also have to come in defense of the nanodrop here. I have measured up to A280 = 98 and the curve is always reasonably smooth, spikes normally

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer

2008-12-08 Thread Jose Antonio Cuesta-Seijo
I also have to come in defense of the nanodrop here. I have measured up to A280 = 98 and the curve is always reasonably smooth, spikes normally mean that bubbles have formed. And "proper cleaning" seems to be rubbing with a kimwipe three or four times after each drop. If the last user does n

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer

2008-12-06 Thread Chun Luo
_ From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juergen Bosch Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 12:29 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer Hi, really strange, I always dilute my protein when taking an absorption

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer

2008-12-06 Thread Juergen Bosch
Hi, really strange, I always dilute my protein when taking an absorption spectra. I try to adjust my expected concentration to a readout of ~ 0.2-0.3 OD280. And the Bradford is just as well as 'picking house numbers', depending on your protein, you can underestimate your protein concentra

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer

2008-12-05 Thread wangsa tirta ismaya
Dear all, Thanks a lot for raising the issue with the not reproducibility of protein measurement with Nanodrop. We use the instrument as a workhorse in the lab. Indeed, recently I observed that the protein concentration suggested by Nanodrop is sometimes differ to the usual colorimetric measuremen

Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer

2008-12-05 Thread Martin Hallberg
Which brings us back to the Hellma "TrayCell" solution where you can, from the same spectrometer, have both the cuvette option and the quickness of the NanoDrop/NanoVue system. Anyone that can comment on the performance of the TrayCell from Hellma? Cheers, Martin On Dec 5, 2008, at 9:06 AM

[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] suggestions for UV spectrometer

2008-12-05 Thread Gregor Witte
Agree! I think for crystallographic use the nanodrop is perfectly okay to see if the protein is 5mg/ml or 30mg/ml. But in fact I also do not trust our instrument if it comes to more important issues like preparing solutions for titrations or assays. And due to the small pathlength I do not trust