As other people have advised in response to some of your previous posts: Invest
in a copy of Bernard Rupp's fantastic text book. Judging from the number of
posts you make, you seem interested in learning the art of crystallography.
This book will answer most if not all of your questions
http://
The sad thing is, although Macs are great crystallography platforms, stereo is
hard at best, ridiculously expensive compared to Linux systems, and still
requires the use of CRTs which have not been manufactured for years ...
what about the fashion statement made by cool glasses?
From: Phoebe Rice [pr...@uchicago.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 10:16 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] while on the subject of stereo
My 2 cents worth on the stereo-dependent:
1)
Dont forget all the "atomic resolution" 3Å structures!
From: Pavel Afonine [pafon...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 6:23 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Fwd: [ccp4bb] FW: [ccp4bb] Resolution and distance
accuracies
Hi,
creat
I'd support BR's position. Why the compelling urge to fill every blob with
atoms? Density should only be modeled when its interpretable. One can comment
about the blob in a paper, and perhaps even show maps for the region,
indicating that there might be something there if its believed to be a
f
Hi,
What do m and D indicate in the Fourier coefficients for a 2mFo-DFc map?
I've dug a bit in web and CCP4 doc but not found an explanation, though I'm
sure its there.
Thanks,
Mark
