Re: [ccp4bb] powdery residue on pucks?

2020-02-22 Thread Zachary A. Wood
We only notice the dust when we let pucks thaw while still assembled. We had always assumed that the dust was due to oxidation (different types of metals in contact with the water from condensation). We have not seen the dust since we began taking apart pucks and removing pins prior to thawing t

Re: [ccp4bb] Contradictory result between ITC and cocrystal structure

2020-02-22 Thread Petri Kursula
Hi, a likely scenario is that your mutant crystallises in the same conformation/packing as the wild-type protein, and this conformation is good for ligand binding. In solution, your mutant protein may be more flexible/open than the wild-type and affinity hence lower. We see this quite often. Var

Re: [ccp4bb] Contradictory result between ITC and cocrystal structure

2020-02-22 Thread Srivastava, Dhiraj
As other said, having co-crystal doesn’t mean you will have measurable affinity. Further no heat in ITC experiments doesn’t mean no binding. Which buffer you used during previous ITC experiment? If heat in the previous experiment (wild type) was due to heat of ionization and you removed the res

Re: [ccp4bb] Contradictory result between ITC and cocrystal structure

2020-02-22 Thread Srivastava, Dhiraj
As other said, having co-crystal doesn’t mean you will have measurable affinity. Further no heat in ITC experiments doesn’t mean no binding. Which buffer you used during previous ITC experiment? If heat in the previous experiment (wild type) was due to heat of ionization and you removed the res

Re: [ccp4bb] Contradictory result between ITC and cocrystal structure

2020-02-22 Thread Patra, Dhabaleswar
Dear Monika, If your protein-ligand interaction is at millimolar, you need to increase injection volume in order to see heat change. Also, you can do the experiment at low temperature such as 10 degree Celsius. You can follow this paper where I have crystallized weak binding ligand and compleme

Re: [ccp4bb] [3dem] Which resolution?

2020-02-22 Thread Nave, Colin (DLSLtd,RAL,LSCI)
Alexis This is a very useful summary. You say you were not convinced by Marin's derivation in 2005. Are you convinced now and, if not, why? My interest in this is that the FSC with half bit thresholds have the danger of being adopted elsewhere because they are becoming standard for protein str

Re: [ccp4bb] Contradictory result between ITC and cocrystal structure

2020-02-22 Thread vipul panchal
Hi Monika, If the protein cocrystalize with ligand doesn't mean it interacts with protein. You have provided insufficient information here. Does the ligand is bound to mutant protein with atleast 2 or 3 hydrogen bonds (how many residues are mutated?) ? If no that means, it is just cocrystalizing b

Re: [ccp4bb] Contradictory result between ITC and cocrystal structure

2020-02-22 Thread Pankaj Chauhan
Beside no change in enthalpy, was there no change in the entropy and affinity? Pankaj Kumar Chauhan, PhD Assistant Professor Ramalingaswami Fellow Department of Biochemistry Jamia Hamdard University (Institute of Eminence by Govt. of India) Hamdard Nagar, Delhi, India 110062 Skype: pankajimtech P

Re: [ccp4bb] powdery residue on pucks?

2020-02-22 Thread Steiner, Roberto
Fully agree with what others have said. When ’the dust’ happened to us we had to replace that particular shipping dewar as T was not holding for very long. Best wishes Roberto On 22 Feb 2020, at 00:33, Emilia C. Arturo (Emily) mailto:ecgart...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi All, We have been noticing