My fault for not changing the thread subject! I'm sorry!
Greetings to ccp4bb readers!
This is a long-delayed reply to requests that I received after I
posted an observation on the ccp4bb almost three years ago. (I think it was
early 2012). The paper had not yet been published (pending final
Greetings to ccp4bb readers!
This is a long-delayed reply to requests that I received after I
posted an observation on the ccp4bb almost three years ago. (I think it was
early 2012). The paper had not yet been published (pending finalization of
experiments unrelated to structural biology) a
>We just had a chance to read this most interesting discussion. We would agree
with Ian that jiggling or SA refinement may not be needed if refinement can in
fact be run to convergence. However, this will be difficult to achieve for large
structures, especially when only moderate to low resolution
Hi Jon,
Thanks, got the answer.
regards
Atul
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Jon Agirre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Balbes database is now nearly 3 years old, so obviously it won't use
> that structure as template... and as Mark has correctly pointed out, Balbes
> is a bit of an overkill for this pr
We just had a chance to read this most interesting discussion. We would agree
with Ian that jiggling or SA refinement may not be needed if refinement can in
fact be run to convergence. However, this will be difficult to achieve for
large
structures, especially when only moderate to low resoluti
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your suggestion. I have already got the solution from Phaser.
Just wanted to know the problem with Balbes, why it is taking random
structures as template?
regards
Atul
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Mark J van Raaij
wrote:
> Just use Amore, Molrep or Phaser and give them
Hi,
the Balbes database is now nearly 3 years old, so obviously it won't use
that structure as template... and as Mark has correctly pointed out, Balbes
is a bit of an overkill for this problem. Just follow his advice and you'll
solve it in no time. MR tools are very automated and easy to use nowa
Just use Amore, Molrep or Phaser and give them the apo structure as model. I
especially recommend Amore for first-time MRers, as it forces you to understand
some basics of MR. And it runs very fast.
Molrep and especially Phaser can probably solve more difficult problems with
lower homology model
Hi all,
I am trying to solve complex structure of my proteins. Apo protein
structure is already known. Balbes should take this structure as template
for MR, whereas, it is taking some random proteins as template. I was
wondering, whether it is synchronized with pdb or uses its own databank.
Since
Hi,
I'm inclined to say that you may have indexed your data
with the wrong space group -your description violates the
definition of a crystal. What happens if you index in P1
and resolve the x-tal using the structure from your current
phases as an MR search model? This is assuming that you
ha
Dear all,
I ran into a problem when I was solving a structure using SAD. After
determining phase and building an initial model using AutoSol, I suddenly
found that every two well ordered protein molecule layers were separated by
a large empty space that extended across the entire crystal. Th
Dear Rohit Kumar Singh,
the ccp4 gui offers 'Calculate Omit Map' and 'Calculate Composite Omit Map' from
the 'Map & Mask Utilities' menu.
Neither GUI askes for much input and should be run with much further ado.
Regards,
Tim
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:05:09PM +0530, rohit kumar wrote:
> dear a
dear all,
can any one tell me how to calculate omit map in ccp4?.
--
WITH REGARDS
Rohit Kumar Singh
Lab. no. 430,
P.I. Dr. S. Gourinath,
School of Life Sciences,
Jawaharlal Nehru University
New Delhi -110067
Dear BB,
I realise this isn’t a CCP4 (or even crystallography) related topic, however
such is the vast and widely experienced nature of the community I thought this
might be a good place to start. We have had our AutoITC200 system in place for
around one year now (upgraded from the manual syst
14 matches
Mail list logo