Dear Yuri,
Why do you think you need 36 reflections per atom when atoms with anisotropic
B-factors only have 9 parameters? You can get away with much fewer in many
cases especially if you have good restraints. As Ethan points out, a drop in
R-free after adding many parameters may be misleading.
On Monday, September 17, 2012 11:31:53 am Yuri Pompeu wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> The protein model I am refining has 400 amino acids (3320 atoms).
> Some real quick calculations tell me that to properly refine it
> anisotropically, I would need 119,520 observations. Given my unit-cell
> dimens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear,
1.24A resolution is reasonable for anisotropic refinement - including
restraints you have more observations than the number of reflections,
so just doing the calculation does not give a concise answer!
You should try and see if the refinement i
Dear community,
The protein model I am refining has 400 amino acids (3320 atoms).
Some real quick calculations tell me that to properly refine it
anisotropically, I would need 119,520 observations. Given my unit-cell
dimension and space-group it is equivalent to about a 1.24 A complete data set.
The Structural Molecular Biology (SMB) Group of Stanford Synchrotron
Radiation Lightsource (SSRL, a Directorate of SLAC) has an opening for a
Beam Line Scientist. This position will participate in a large user
support team that provides expert technical & methodological support for
scientific
I am using Phenix 1.8-1069. I am having a problem with phenix refine
terminating with an error message. I added several solvent molecules, MPD
and bicarbonate in Coot, and ran Phenix ReadySet to generate restraints for
them and applied those restraints to all future jobs in that project. When
I try
The CCP4 Study Weekend (3 - 5 January 2013)
East Midlands Conference Centre, University of Nottingham
Thursday 3 - MX User Meeting
Friday 4 / Saturday 5 - CCP4 Study Weekend
"Molecular Replacements"
We cordially invite you to participate in this year's Study Weekend at the the
East Midlands
Hi Andreas,
The simple answer to this is that you do NOT
attempt to redefine the background. Providing the additional spots
shown in your image belong to the same lattice, mosflm will
automatically exclude pixels from adjacent spots when doing the
background plane fi
Hi all,
I'm integrating data from a crystal with a fairly long axis. In iMosflm
(1.0.7), the background definition is so generous that plenty of pixels
from adjacent peaks are included (see attached). Can someone tell me
how I redefine the background to be tighter around the spots?
Thanks.
A Postdoctoral (or senior postdoc) Research Associate position in Protein
X-ray crystallography is available in the Song laboratory at Baylor College
of Medicine, which is one of the top medical schools in the US (*
http://www.bcm.edu/about*/). The successful candidate is expected to have a
strong
Dear Bhupesh,
The first thing is to check that you are
using the latest version of mosflm (7.0.9, 14th May 2012). If you are
using this version, then please send me more details of the problem
and ideally some images.
Best wishes,
Andrew
On 17 Sep 2012, at 09:
Tim,
Correct, but take care that 's' in Niu's program is
2.sin(theta)/lambda whereas in exp(-Bs^2) it is just sin(theta)/lambda
(as it is in the usual expression for f(s)).
Cheers
-- Ian
On 17 September 2012 10:24, Tim Gruene wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear James et al.,
so to summarise, the answer to Niu's question is that he must add a
factor of e^(-Bs^2) to the formula of Cromer/Mann and then adjust the
value of B until it matches the inset. Given that you claim
rho=0.025e/A^3 (I assume for 1/dma
Dear all
We have recently collected data at XRD1 beamline at Sincrotrone Trieste on a
Dectris Pilatus detector.
We are unable to integrate the images in mosflm, which keeps crashing with some
error: e.g. "profile_fitted_partials" or "b_slope" or some such! (indexing
seems to work ok).
Any
Le Lundi 17 Septembre 2012 08:32 CEST, James Holton a écrit
Hello
May I add a few words after the thorough comments by James.
I lmay be easier to consider series termination in real space as follows.
The effect of series termination in 3D on rho(r) is of convoluting the exact
rho(r) with the "
15 matches
Mail list logo