Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Nagarajan V
Typically, what you image is Trp fluorescence by exciting at around 280 nm and observing at around 350 nm. Standard silicon based detectors do fine at the detection wavelength, although, as you can imagine, increased sensitivity in the UV means increase in the price of the detector. If your excitat

[ccp4bb] crystallization of complex and ...

2011-09-15 Thread m zhang
Dear all, I have two questions: First, I was trying to crystallize a complex of two proteins. Both proteins has been crystallized before. The two proteins bind to each other based on Biacore study, but they didn't form a single peak on gel filtration. When I mixed them at 1:1 ratio, the cry

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Edward A. Berry
A "real" UV microscope requires quartz optics, right? Probably conventional microscopes use glass. And you can't see 280 nm (and its not good for your eyes) so you need some kind of phosphor screen to view the image? Bosch, Juergen wrote: I'm replying here to myself :-) So in an off-board discu

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Bosch, Juergen
I'm replying here to myself :-) So in an off-board discussion it turns out that the "microscope" in question was a special emitted light and not a UV microscope. So real UV microscopes might be better for the purpose of detecting real crystals. Sorry for the confusion - had too much sun today :

Re: [ccp4bb] Why Does Cross-linking Mean Anything?

2011-09-15 Thread Herwig Schuler
Dear Jacob, agree, it's a mess. From what I read, the glutataldehyde concentration should be low (<0.01%) and the x-linked complex that you get should not occur in high salt conditions (reasoning that 1.2M KCl would break the average complex apart). Have seen papers where more selective zero le

[ccp4bb] Ph.D. fellowships in Structural Biology at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan

2011-09-15 Thread Marina Mapelli
PhD Fellowships to study molecular mechanisms of Asymmetric Cell Divisions at IEO, Milano Applications are invited for two Ph.D. positions to study the structure and function of macromolecular complexes involved in asymmetric cell divisions. To understand mechanisms underlying asymmetric

Re: [ccp4bb] Why Does Cross-linking Mean Anything?

2011-09-15 Thread Jacob Keller
>> Maybe one should do a gradient of >> gluteraldehyde concentrations, then plot the deviation of the observed >> cross-linked oligomerization from a theoretical null hypothesis? > > Right - just do it side-by-side with a protein known to be monomeric of > roughly the same size/lysine content...  A

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Andrew Purkiss-Trew
Quoting Ed Pozharski : On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 20:50 +0100, Andrew Purkiss-Trew wrote: Molecular Dimension do such an adaptor which fits to existing microscopes. Do you by any chance know the price? I can seemingly "order" it through the website for the hefty price of $0.00, which is too good

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Jürgen Bosch
I once tested such a commercial system in Seattle about 4 years ago. It did not impress me. In particular the discrimination between salt and protein did not work for about 10 different proteins from which we already had collected data. sure those were small between 10 and 100 micrometer. Excuse

Re: [ccp4bb] Why Does Cross-linking Mean Anything?

2011-09-15 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:10 -0500, Jacob Keller wrote: > Maybe one should do a gradient of > gluteraldehyde concentrations, then plot the deviation of the observed > cross-linked oligomerization from a theoretical null hypothesis? Right - just do it side-by-side with a protein known to be monomer

[ccp4bb] Why Does Cross-linking Mean Anything?

2011-09-15 Thread Jacob Keller
Dear Crystallographers and Biochemists, cross-linking, say with gluteraldehyde, is an oft-used method of demonstrating a protein's oligomeric state in solution. I have a difficulty with this, however: theoretically (and in practice!), one can tune the amount of cross-linker to get what ever result

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Frank von Delft
A while ago I was trying to be cheap, so we played around with it quite a bit in the lab. After rediscovering some of the basics of signal-to-noise and microscope transmission efficiency and that sort of rot, I realised that the commercial systems may not be all that ridiculously overpriced af

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Ed Pozharski
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 20:50 +0100, Andrew Purkiss-Trew wrote: > Molecular Dimension do such an adaptor which fits to existing > microscopes. Do you by any chance know the price? I can seemingly "order" it through the website for the hefty price of $0.00, which is too good to be true. -- "Hurry

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Andrew Purkiss-Trew
Quoting "Harman, Christine" : Hi All, I was curious if any of you have tried or even know if it is possible to adapt a stereoscope (in my case an Olympus SZX10 model) so as to view protein crystals with UV illumination. Basically, I want a cheap manual version of what a Rock UV Imager does

Re: [ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Sweet
I'm not going to respond to the larger group, but I know one can buy LEDs that emit strongly at 280 nm, which would give tryptophan fluorescence. They're about $200, and one could build or buy a control circuit for not much more. I think this is about what the commercial tools do. You'd want

[ccp4bb] UV imaging of crystals

2011-09-15 Thread Harman, Christine
Hi All, I was curious if any of you have tried or even know if it is possible to adapt a stereoscope (in my case an Olympus SZX10 model) so as to view protein crystals with UV illumination. Basically, I want a cheap manual version of what a Rock UV Imager does. I know this is probably a crazy d

[ccp4bb] The 2012 CCP4 Study Weekend on Data Processing

2011-09-15 Thread Charles Ballard
CCP4 Study Weekend - 4-6 January 2012 We cordially invite you to participate in this year's Study Weekend at the Warwick Conferences, University of Warwick. Once again, we have put together an exciting scientific programme for Thursday and Friday, either side of the traditional conference dinne

Re: [ccp4bb] map file specification

2011-09-15 Thread David Waterman
Hi Pascal, The map data is a three dimensional array with dimensions [NC, NR, NS]. On its own, this gives you no information about the grid pitch in the three (crystallographic, not Cartesian) directions, which is determined in fractional coordinates by the number of intervals. That is, along the

Re: [ccp4bb] map file specification

2011-09-15 Thread David Waterman
typo: MAPC, MAPR and MAPS are elements 17-19 of the header, but you can see that anyway from the specification. Cheers -- David On 15 September 2011 09:51, David Waterman wrote: > Hi Pascal, > > The map data is a three dimensional array with dimensions [NC, NR, NS]. On > its own, this gives yo

Re: [ccp4bb] Fortran runtime error in Procheck on Mac OS X 10.6.8

2011-09-15 Thread Saul Hazledine
Hello Alex, I know nothing about Procheck but the following may be of interest to you. There is a similar error message produced during ARP/wARP model building as described in the message below: https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=CCP4BB;30c74e5a.1109 This error was found to be cau

[ccp4bb] map file specification

2011-09-15 Thread Pascal
Hi, I am looking at the specifications of the ccp4 map file format and I am confused with the number of columns and the number of intervals. I assume that the number of columns is the grid size but what is the number of intervals (elements 8-9 in the header)? Regards, Pascal