Hello:
Thank you to all for nice information about SAXS.
Regards,
Rojan
From: Catarina Rodrigues [mailto:catarina.rodrig...@afmb.univ-mrs.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 3:26 PM
To: ro...@riken.jp
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Saxs reviews or books
Hi,
I recommend you the revie
I'd also highly recommend
X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation:
defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in
solution
Christopher D. Putnam, Michal Hammel, Greg L. Hura and John A. Tainer
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics /
Hi Rojan,
This paper may be more on the intermediate level, but is certainly worth a read.
Koch MH, Vachette P, Svergun DI. Q Rev Biophys. Small-angle scattering: a view
on the properties, structures and structural changes of biological
macromolecules in solution. 2003 May; 36(2): 147-227.
htt
Hi,
you can check this page http://www.embl-hamburg.de/biosaxs/embo10.html
there are several presentations plus recommended reading list.
Cheers,
Albert
Albert GUSKOV (Dr) | Research Fellow | Division of Structural &
Computational Biology | Nanyang Technological University
Proteos 7-01, Biopolis D
Somewhat unrelated to your question, but relevant to what you are doing:
I was once told by an expert that NDG is not known to occur much in
glycoproteins; it is usually an NAG that was built using the wrong
stereoisomer by a careless crystallographer. I have actually looked at a
few higher-res
Hello Rojan,
This paper from last year may be a good place to start. It provides a nice "road
map" through the small angle scattering experiment that a non-expert can follow
while also describing the scattering data so that a non-expert can more critically
evaluate it. I found it very informa
HI James,
Obviously, this depends a bit on which refinement program you use, and I am
> not familiar with all of them. However, I have had some conversations with
> Garib "refmac" Murshudov and Pavel "phenix.refine" Afonine about this, and
> the shocking answer appears to be "no".
>
wow, I've g
Hello:
I am very novice about Small Angle X-ray Scattering. I am looking for
introductory books or review papers. Could you recommend this type of
document?
Regards,
Rojan
Hi
they are in the standard dictionary. To make sure that you have full range of
ligand you may take the dictionary from
www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/refmac/data/refmac_experimental/refmac_dictionary_v5.23.tar.gz
and corresponding refmac
www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/refmac/refmac_experimental/refmac5.6_linux.ta
Hi,
I am running refmac on gp120(PDB 3FUS), and wondering whether there are
any dictionary files (.cif) that have already been built for the
polysaccharide (containing FUL BMA MAN NAG NDG, with NAG linked to ASN).
Thanks in advance for any help!
Best Regards, Hailiang
A POSTDOCTORAL POSITION to study naturally occurring and rationally
designed PHOTORECEPTORS is available at the Department of Biomolecular
Mechanisms at the Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg.
The highly interdisciplinary group focuses on understanding reaction
mechanisms usi
Dear Users,
The deadline for March/April 2011 Collaborative
Crystallography proposals will be *Jan 15, 2011.*
Through the Collaborative Crystallography Program (CC) at the
Advanced Light Source (ALS), s
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 13:45 -0600, Kenneth A. Satyshur wrote:
> So lets include them in all refinements, regardless of resolution. At
> least we
> will have given the community a model with the most correct biological
> representation.
First of all, the fraction of structures in which the hydroge
At this resolution it is very much possible to choose a wrong space
group. So try lower symmetry first and see if it helps. Check for
twinning too.
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 19:08 +, Dimitris Ladakis wrote:
> Dear all
> I've got a 3A dataset processed with mosflm and scaled. I've
> runned MOLREP
*** Posted on behalf of Leo Brady, please contact him with any queries
(contact details included below) ***
Dear all,
Please could I draw your attention to a lectureship/readership recently
advertised here in Bristol. We are hoping to appoint a new faculty member
with interests that overlap
No both settings are equally valid, it's just telling you that it has
re-indexed to the conventional monoclinic cell with beta nearest to 90 (and
>= 90). I believe there's an option in pointless if you really want to keep
the non-conventional cell with beta > 120.
-- Ian
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at
Hi all,
I have been processing data using XDS which results in the cell constants
179.1 55.21 149.5
90 124.3 90. and the space group is C2. Checking
systematic absences have shown that the screw axis is not present. Again I was
checking the space group using POINTLESS. It was re
Dear All, just a new year reminder as application deadlines are
approaching...
We currently have two post-doc positions available at Diamond, one
associated with beamline I04-1 and the other supported through the
Wellcome Trust.
Full details available in links below:
http://www.diamond.ac.uk/H
Dear All,
Please note that we currently have a postdoctoral position available
in Biochemistry/X-ray crystallography in our Structural Biology
laboratory located in the center of Paris (France). For more details
on the project, please see the attached document.
You can also contact me via
Hallo Naman,
According to IUPAC:
"Naturally occurring and synthetic polypeptides having molecular weights greater
than about 1 (the limit is not precise). "
http://goldbook.iupac.org/P04898.html
Cheers, Tim
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:52:48AM -0500, naman mangukia wrote:
> Hello 2 all
>
>
As I said, those omissions of promised deposition are probably just
bookkeeping errors, but nevertheless, a promise is a promise. The other ones
I agree are probably unrecoverable. I know I lost an early SF set completely
and was really pleased when the PDB actively solicited SFs, because now I
cou
At 00:15 10-01-2011, Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.) wrote:
Yes, exactly. 2002 papers, the question is how to
1) assure consistent deposition verification
2) how to fix omissions in earlier entries
Best, BR
PS: How did the EO confirm deposition - just ask you or the PDB, or some
more automa
22 matches
Mail list logo
