Hi all,
yes, re-running jobs was the issue. So, creating a new job did the
trick.
Thanks for all the various feedback!
Jan
On Mar 6, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Paul Fyfe wrote:
Hi Jan,
I had exactly the same problem. It happens (for me) when you try and
re-run a job created for a previous version
Well, either there haven't been any replies yet or my institution's
email server is unhappy with me (if it's email problems, sorry if I'm
duplicating other responses).
> This instance leaves room for some concern about the verification of
> deposited structure factors: what happened here is c
Dear all,
I am refining a structure that has a ligand which contains a thiol group and
forms a disulfide with the cysteine. I created the cif file with the Dundee
server for the ligand and modified the BME-cysteine link cif file to fit my
ligand. I combined these two cif files and feed it to Refmac
Dear all,
This time, with plot attached - and apologies.
Gerard.
--
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 05:58:49PM +, Gerard Bricogne wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The newly-deposited structure 3ftt from the CSGID structural genomics
> group has fields in its sf.cif
Dear all,
The newly-deposited structure 3ftt from the CSGID structural genomics
group has fields in its sf.cif file called F_meas_au and F_meas_sigma_au,
but which clearly contain F_calc and ph_calc - at least, the F_meas_sigma_au
field is uniformly distributed on [0,360] and the F_meas_au f
Dear All,
In the group of Winfried Hinrichs a postdoctoral position/staff scientist
is available in Greifswald/Germany for initially 3 years.
The position involves research and teaching. Knowledge in German
is not mandatory but might be helpful.
You may test your skills with the official posting
Hello,
The 2008 "Quo Vadis Structural Biology?" Symposium was well received
with over 250 participants. We are happy to announce that we decided
to repeat the event in 2009, with a revised format. First, we
relocated to the Countway Library - a smaller, more affordable venue
in the very c
Hi Jan
Changes have been made to the Refmac interface in 6.1.1 which are not
backwardly compatible. This means that if you try to rerun an old refmac
job, it will give the error you see. The solution is to run a new refmac
job and fill in the input fields from scratch.
Norman Stein
CCP4
-Or
