Apologies for the typographical error in the start date...
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kantardjieff, Katherine
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 5:06 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] staff scientist Keck Cente
I wrote:
Isn't it the case that vdw interactions are turned off
between atoms in a residue, and perhaps with the residues
before and after?
No it is not the case, at least in refmac5 and SHELLXL.
Thanks to those who clarified this.
Jim Naismith's earlier post, which I had not seen, suggests
a b
Several Research Associate (team leader) and Post-doctoral positions in
structural biology
are available in the Chromatin biology and Epigenetic group at the
Structural Genomics Consortium,
University of Toronto. My group aims to characterize chromatin proteins
involved in histone code
"readi
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT TECH III, STAFF SCIENTIST, W. M. KECK FOUNDATION
CENTER FOR MOLECULAR STRUCURE
The College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics and Department of
Chemistry and Biochemistry seek applications for the position of Staff
Scientist, W.M. Keck Foundation Center for Molecular Stru
> Of course, you cannot reproduce the output.
The question was actually different. Minor differences
in numbers are not the problem. The absence of 'others' in the
restraint table is inconsistent with the statement
at the end of the table that riding hydrogens were used.
BR
-Original M
Hi,
I reran that (same refmac version) but I cannot reproduce the output.
Of course, you cannot reproduce the output. This is most likely because
the H atoms were used internally in all calculations but they were not
deposited in PDB (like in most of cases). So, to reproduce the numbers
All right, one more peculiar question on the subject:
If that is true - that
> "others" in case means the bonds to the hydrogens added in riding
positions during refinement
then how comes that in example 2veh the restraint listing does not have
'others' but still says that hydrogens were added?
Several Research Associate (team leader) and Post-doctoral positions in
structural biology
are available in the Chromatin biology and Epigenetic group at the Structural
Genomics Consortium,
University of Toronto. My group aims to characterize chromatin proteins
involved in histone code
"readi
SHELXL does not provide torsion angle restraints. As far as I can tell,
the normal procedure using REFMAC and PHENIX.REFINE is to refine with
torsion angle restraints applied to side-chains but not to the psi and
phi angles (all three programs have ways of keeping peptide units
approximately pl
I could not say about other program but in refmac there are intra
residue vdw repulsions if atoms are at least two bonds are apart.
If atoms are only two bonds apart then vdw distance is reduced and it
can be controlled.
I do agree that at lower resolution you should use as much info as
you
Bernhard Rupp wrote:
Dear All,
I wonder about the exact use of torsion restrains and the effect
on phi/psi/w validation.
a) does refmac restrain phipsi at all (except vdw repulsion
which does not bias them otherwise)?
Isn't it the case that vdw interactions are turned off
between ato
While working with a low-affinity, nonspecific DNA binding protein, I
ran into this problem dishearteningly often. In several cases, even
when running washed crystals out on a gel had told me that they
contained both DNA and protein (32P-labeling for DNA, Coomassie for
protein), I was unable to
If memory serves correctly Ramachandran based his plot on VDW.
Therefore all programs which use VDW will tend to put residues in the right
place.
Certainly in phenix.refine adding H's to one of my problematic structures
(twinning) not only improved the clash score but pushed a further 4% into
th
All statistics aside, I never believe a molecular
replacement solution until it produces an Fo-Fc
map with peaks for something that should have
been there but wasn't in the model.
If you know roughly where the DNA should bind,
you could try making a solvent mask that includes
that region (pl
Dear All,
I wonder about the exact use of torsion restrains and the effect
on phi/psi/w validation.
I think in refmac, omega is restrained with a 1-4 dihedral or
planarity, cis when the proper LINK statement is invoked - no
questions there.
In literature I find remarks like 'usually not restrain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi;
You might also consider if it is likely that you have statistical
disorder, causing a blur in the DNA. This could be the case if your
binding is not specific, in which case it is possible that DNA is
shifted by a couple of bases (or if your
16 matches
Mail list logo