[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2024-01-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Here's another one today. libwacom 2.9.0-1 has a clear regression detected by its superficial autopkgtest but Ubuntu'sbritney is reporting "Not a regression" for s390x. The regression was reported as https://bugs.debian.org/1060687 and Debian's britney is correctly detecting it as an autopkgtest r

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2024-01-13 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Here's another screenshot. amd64 is reported as "Reference test in progress, but real test failed already". When the migration-reference/0 run returns "neutral", it will be reported as "Not a regression" and would be allowed to migrate if I hadn't noticed the issue and filed a block-proposed bug.

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2024-01-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
My blind guess is that this is a britney configuration issue but I never looked very deeply into how britney and autopkgtest work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Auto Package Testing. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2024-01-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
superficial tests that pass are marked as neutral. In Debian's implementation, this means that a package that only has superficial autopkgtests will NOT get the autopkgtest "bounty" which reduces the number of days a package must wait in Unstable before automatically migrating to Testing. (The boun

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2043915] Re: Booting into live session results in try/install page white screen

2024-01-16 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Changed in: ubuntu-desktop-installer Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: ubuntu-desktop-installer Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2050884] Re: gnome-initial-setup always fails on sending first report

2024-01-23 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I think it is useful to use this issue to track the server issue and save 2049670 for the client issue in gnome-initial-setup. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 2049670 noble: gnome-initial-setup 20 second delay & error popup ** Also affects: ubuntu-report (Ubuntu) Importance: Und

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2013307] Re: The slide of Ubuntu Kylin show wrong kernel version

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** No longer affects: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (Ubuntu Lunar) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2013307 Title: The slide of Ubuntu Kylin show wrong kernel version Status in u

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2033949] Re: Does not work with Ubuntu sources in deb822 format

2024-02-17 Thread Jeremy Bícha
This did not fix the issue, but the issue is now being tracked at LP: #2053228 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033949 Title: Does not work with Ubuntu sources in deb822 form

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Ok, pulling in postfix is very disruptive since gpg-wks-client was seeded in Ubuntu Desktop 22.04 LTS and 23.10 and several flavors. postfix's install has a debconf prompt which is now allowed for the default desktop install. ** Summary changed: - gnupg is pulling in gpg-wks-server which pulls in

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Description changed: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-02-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Description changed: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-04-15 Thread Jeremy Bícha
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060578 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060578 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2060578 postfix installed during release upgrade to Noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] [NEW] autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2023-09-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Public bug reported: Example 1 = Yesterday, I noticed that gnome-metronome 1.3.0-0ubuntu2 was allowed to migrate from mantic-proposed to mantic despite its own autopkgtest failing on every architecture. This migration happened after an automatic migration-reference run happened which re

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for superficial tests

2023-09-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2023-09-10 12-40-48.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2035101/+attachment/5699929/+files/Screenshot%20from%202023-09-10%2012-40-48.png ** Summary changed: - autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for superficial tests + autop

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2023-09-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I believe this used to work correctly in previous years. I believe it has been failing for several weeks or more but it took me until now to be alert enough tosee it happen live with screenshots for my first example and still happening while we wait for webkit2gtk to be eligible for migration. (W

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2023-09-11 Thread Jeremy Bícha
It looks like gnome-feeds 2.2.0-1 is being correctly prevented from migrating today even though it only has a superficial autopkgtest also. Its migration-reference run was last year. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Au

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2023-09-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I did some migration-reference/0 tests on the other architectures but maybe this is another example? With a neutral migration-reference/0 , this package or things triggering it should never have migrated, right? https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/rust-ureq/mantic/s390x -- You received thi

Re: [Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Merge] ~nteodosio/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:main into ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs:main

2024-11-07 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Yeah, you can propose the hint if you want and then it's up to the Ubuntu Release Team if they want to accept it. I have asked the Canonical Release Management Team (formerly Canonical QA Team) to look into the root cause of this issue. i386 autopkgtests should not be using pkgconf from amd64 s

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2091054] [NEW] i386 autopkgtests using amd64 pkgconf which doesn't work

2024-12-04 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Public bug reported: i386 autopkgtests are using pkgconf from amd64 which means that many i386 autopkgtests will fail. I noticed that this situation got worse within the past week as more autopkgtests are failing that used to pass. I have run migration- reference tests for these that I have seen

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2035101] Re: autopkgtest failures are ignored, apparently for packages with only superficial tests

2024-12-09 Thread Jeremy Bícha
I believe I am seeing this again today with picplanner which should have been flagged as a regression for gtk4 4.17. See https://launchpad.net/bugs/2091297 and https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html#gtk4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Canonical-ubuntu-qa] [Bug 2091054] Re: i386 autopkgtests using amd64 pkgconf which doesn't work

2024-12-06 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Thanks Alessandro. I can confirm that libsoup3's i386 autopkgtest is now passing again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Auto Package Testing. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091054 Title: i386 autopkgtests using a