On Jan 7, 2008 10:45 PM, John David Anderson (_psychic_)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Kjell Bublitz wrote:
>
> >
> > Hmmm... I have a problem with a "comment"-function.
> >
> > Comments encourage discussions - Discussions have nothing to do with
> > documentation.
>
On Jan 7, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Kjell Bublitz wrote:
>
> Hmmm... I have a problem with a "comment"-function.
>
> Comments encourage discussions - Discussions have nothing to do with
> documentation.
Like rtconner said, php.net's documentation has really benefitted from
comments. It allows people
Seems to work well for php.net. Well I think they call it "notes".
On Jan 7, 2:31 pm, "Kjell Bublitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm... I have a problem with a "comment"-function.
>
> Comments encourage discussions - Discussions have nothing to do with
> documentation.
>
> If theres a comment
Hmmm... I have a problem with a "comment"-function.
Comments encourage discussions - Discussions have nothing to do with
documentation.
If theres a comment function it is almost as good as an invitation for
beginners to ask right away, rather than to read on their own. We all
know that well enou
A comments section on the Docs pages is enough for me. Any info
missing by the docs themselves can be filled in as users leave
comments. I asked John about this once, he said they've got it
covered. So now.. just gotta wait for the official docs system to get
released.
I suppose that'll be out fa
I like the idea of only allowing published authors on bakery to modify
the wiki.
But then again there are the tempdocs that are under construction -
who wants to maintain two separate documentation efforts?
Can they be combined at all?
Adam
On Jan 7, 10:46 pm, "Kjell Bublitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
How can you recruit maintainers and editors when the current docs team
can't do that? I have some great help from great people, but no one
seems to have the time to commit on a regular basis. A wiki represents
a much higher maintenance cost, something I doubt you can muster. The
core team
I haven't been here long enough to know what the old wiki was like, but I do
know that wiki's have been of major use to me in the past. Wiki's are
excellent IMO. I think where they fail is with reviews by main members.
I personally would LOVE to see a wiki.
--
Baz L
On Jan 7, 2008 6:46 AM, Kjell
Hi list and maintainers!
As the topictitle says, i would like to see a wiki-revival.
I like the bakery, but since we are all desperate for docs, good
up-to-date examples and practices it would help the community if we
had a Wiki again!
I am also not for a Wiki that is swarmed by newcomers askin
