A comments section on the Docs pages is enough for me. Any info missing by the docs themselves can be filled in as users leave comments. I asked John about this once, he said they've got it covered. So now.. just gotta wait for the official docs system to get released.
I suppose that'll be out faster than any wiki could be properly assembled in any case. On Jan 7, 8:03 am, Adam Royle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like the idea of only allowing published authors on bakery to modify > the wiki. > > But then again there are the tempdocs that are under construction - > who wants to maintain two separate documentation efforts? > > Can they be combined at all? > > Adam > > On Jan 7, 10:46 pm, "Kjell Bublitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi list and maintainers! > > > As the topictitle says, i would like to see a wiki-revival. > > > I like the bakery, but since we are all desperate for docs, good > > up-to-date examples and practices it would help the community if we > > had a Wiki again! > > > I am also not for a Wiki that is swarmed by newcomers asking for help > > on the 101 but i also dont want to explain stuff more than twice (in > > chats or wherever), and i myself dislike hunting for "good" blog > > entries or the "right topic" in the groups. Can be very frustrating at > > times... you gotta admit that. > > > I know from the past that the Wiki was a mess, but thats where we need > > to recrute/name moderators (an open sub-team maybe). You could count > > me in for that. > > > A wiki version of the docs is absolutely necessary in such a long > > transition phase. > > > There are so many changes and most devs want to use and learn 1.2 already. > > > The docteam then could adopt the writings and compile it, readers > > could download/export a current draft, subscribe to pages using rss, > > etc .. > > > But for this to work the general structure needs to be layed out from > > start (bakery is a good example: version info, type). > > > With a well categorized layout we should be able to reach a good > > amount of quality! The old Wiki had no structure at all... > > > Maybe in the beginning we should give all approved contributers from > > bakery write access to the wiki only. > > > That would sort out the problem of having everybody creating pages at will. > > > Later on we can remove this restriction after a good amount is > > ported/created within the new setup and we give everyone write access. > > > Who wouldn't want the Manual Pages to be reviewed? :-) > > > What you think? > > > Best! > > Kjell "m3nt0r" Bublitz > > > PS: please use mediawiki if you give it a (second) shot. The old > > wiki-soft was crap.. ^^ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
