You don't mention which version you're using, but I'm going to assume
1.2 because of the $form code.
Really, we need to see your controller code to figure this out, but it
should be something like this:
... in users_controller.php
function register() {
if(!empty($this->data)) {
if($thi
Unlikely.
My theory on this, others may disagree, is that Flash is better added
by the theory of progressive enhancement. That's why I use jQuery plus
the jQuery Flash plugin to handle it at the client side. I'm pretty
sure other libraries have similar solutions.
Steve
On Feb 1, 11:00 pm, Ata A
It's not a stupid question... makes perfect sense!
Try this:
link(__($post['Category']['title'], true),
array('controller' => 'posts', 'action' => 'category',
$post['Category']['id'])); ?>
The only difference from your method is that $post['Category']['id']
isn't getting appended directly to th
Hi all,
I'm at the latter stages of a big-ish CakePHP 1.2 project now (it's an
online wine store with a bespoke shopping cart system, entirely
developed by myself - which probably means it's full of bugs since I
haven't had time to write full tests for the thing).
One of the requirements is for
I might not be understanding this properly - but WHY would you want to
stick session IDs in the URL? It's just about the worst thing you
could ever do for SEO.
Steve
On Jan 28, 12:38 pm, sanemat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wordering how to get url to work:
> /?CAKEPHP=session_id
>
> Here i
Why does everyone keep beating the dead horse of a wiki? We had one
before, when I first got into Cake. Guess what? It wasn't very
effective. Outdated articles providing poor solutions to problems that
didn't need to be solved. I prefer the Bakery, these groups and the
various articles written on
Why would a tutorial with pictures help? If Cake was actually a CMS or
something I could understand it, but it's not - it's a programming
framework. As such an illustrated tutorial wouldn't be all that
useful.
Check out the screencasts, that's probably as much of a step by step
illustrated tutori
It does, but you still need a model for the link. If I remember
correctly anyway.
I think Danielle is correct here though. Your database structure is
overcomplicated a little - you could achieve the same goal by having:
Size:-
id
size
shortCode
Colour:-
id
colour
Style:-
id
style
description
djiize, thanks for the code sample. That's effectively what my own
code was doing, except (for some stupid reason) I'd neglected to load
the User model to get the hashPasswords function (in the theory that
it would be loaded by the Auth component anyway, I think).
I'm with nate on this one (not b
Spot on, that's how I would do it. Avoids the expensive (and non-
scaling by table size) updateAll. This way when you change the default
image, you only have one field in one record to change, rather than 1
field in N records where N might possibly be a very big number.
Steve
On Jan 18, 7:13 pm,
Indeed AD.
I was just being picky, because we see so many requests for help here
which don't give us any clues at all (and in most cases are a _demand_
for help rather than a request).
Steve
On Jan 18, 9:08 am, AD7six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 10:03 am, MrTufty <
What he said ;)
I've been working with overriding hashPasswords to provide a randomly
salted sha256 implementation, but my brains leaked out of my ears
(that'll teach me to code at 3am).
Steve
On Jan 18, 11:30 am, djiize <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can already choose your hashing method, s
You're not telling us anything about your specific situation, so it's
unlikely anyone is going to be particularly helpful.
Some things that would help:
What version of Cake are you using?
What environment are you running it in? Windows? Linux? Where do you
have it installed?
With that informati
The problem here is the mismatch between the name of the plugin and
the default controller name.
For this to work, you need to rename contents_controller.php to
content_controller.php (and obviously amend the class name within
that). Additionally the views/contents/ folder needs to be renamed.
T
It depends how many configuration settings you need to store.
Personally, I'm just adding to the bottom of app/config/core.php -
seems to work fairly effectively.
Others have used a model and component in order to store configuration
settings in the database. I haven't tried this yet.
Steve
On
Deane,
I have to disagree with your opinion that the business logic belongs
in the controllers. From my understanding of MVC best practices,
specifically "Fat models, skinny controllers" - the models should be
responsible for the business logic, not the controllers. The
controllers are pretty muc
An alternative way which might scale better would be to have your
posts table, your users table, and a posts_users table, joined using a
hasAndBelongsToMany association. That way you don't get those comma-
separated values, which are a complete bitch to deal with if you ever
want to access them us
Hi guys,
Found a strange issue in the current SVN (I'm using branches, so I'm
currently on r6179).
In my default layout I use 2 requestAction calls to pull in data for
elements. This works 100% fine, in the main part of the app.
I use a plugin to handle the backend administration of the site, b
e how to use request action in view for calling function in
> app_controller
> and app_controller to model
> and my view file is default.ctp
>
> because for calling request action i need controller name
>
> and for calling function in app controller i need model name
>
>
9 times out of 10, if not 99 out of 100, just putting the Cake files
into your webroot will work perfectly, with the exception of
mod_rewrite issues. I don't really understand where the problem is
coming from in this case, but it's more likely to be an issue with
your Apache configuration than wit
It looks like you haven't really studied the whole MVC, separation of
concerns thing. You shouldn't be calling functions in the model from
the view. You shouldn't even be calling controller functions from the
view. In short, the controller queries the model and then sends the
information on to the
It WAS a huge disaster. I got involved with Cake at that point, and I
almost gave it up because of the huge inaccuracies present in the
Wiki. At any given point there were 3 or 4 suggestions on how to do
each task, and 3 of them would be wrong somewhere along the line - but
of course you wouldn't
One tip to avoid error messages like this would be to change the
definition of your function to:
function index($username = null) {
That way if a username is not passed, it doesn't break.
BUT, that doesn't solve your problem, which appears to be that the
username isn't being set at all - have y
That's exactly how I'd do it too.
With the exception that I'd put the code in via a touch of jQuery in
the view instead, but that's a matter of style.
Tufty
On Dec 13, 9:02 am, francky06l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could set your text field as an hidden field at first. Then
> handling "on
At a guess, I'd say that your /posts/index action isn't returning the
data correctly.
This is roughly what it should look like: excuse the dodgy formatting.
class PostsController extends AppController {
... snipped ...
function index() {
$posts = $this->Post->findAll();
if(isse
Yes, you can do it that way too. But if you set up the associations,
you don't NEED to change $uses to include Ugroup, as it will
automatically be included based on it's association with the User
model.
On Dec 12, 9:22 am, avairet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My cake knowledge is limit
This is almost certainly a .htaccess issue. I suspect by default
either mod_rewrite is not turned on, or the rule for it is
AllowOverride None.
In the first instance, turn mod_rewrite on (ask your host for
information on how to do that, as it will vary).
In the second instance, change AllowOverri
The error message you're getting tells you what the problem is... on
line 34, you're referring to $this->Ugroup->findByUgroupid().
This would be fine, except that you haven't told cake to give you
access to Ugroup in this way. I'm assuming you have a model for
Ugroup, and that it's associated wit
Good solutions Richard, nice one.
You may want to look into specifying the 'on' part of the validation
rule, which allows you to set whether the validation is done on
creating a new record, or updating an existing one. I'm not sure how,
if at all, that would tie into the code you've provided here
And is entirely wrong... well, no, it'll work, but it doesn't take
advantage of CakePHP 1.2 validation. The IBM tutorials are good, but
outdated now.
Richard, as you suspect, you're not supposed to be referencing
isUnique in a rule. But, you don't need to use it in the controller.
Here's how you'
rote:
> On Nov 23, 2007 6:50 PM, MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm trying to implement a remember me function - I initially thought
> > Chris' most recent post on the subject would help me out, but perhaps
> > I'm just not understanding ho
Hi everyone,
I'm having problems... and I'm hoping that with the meeting of minds
we have going on here, someone can point out where I'm going wrong.
I'm using 1.2 to build several sites at the moment - it's definitely
my framework of choice, for pretty much every site I build, personal
and for
Install Joomla into a folder in app/webroot/, then point your
subdomain at that.
I've successfully done this for phpBB (although user database
integration is an entirely different beast).
On Nov 11, 4:26 pm, chogi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Got a quick question. I got cake running
I've seen this happen myself - do you have anything like Zend
Accelerator installed? I can't think what was causing it on my test
system (it was months ago, before I migrated to the fertile grounds of
1.2 development).
On Nov 7, 2:22 pm, MaxDao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I tried, it. In mod
I suggest you do some research on that thing commonly called the
internet...
On Nov 7, 10:27 am, "NAREN KUMAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> iam new to this group.
>
> i need code to Read MS WORD document and stores in string from linux
> system as well as from windows
>
> thanking u
Skipping the ?> is actually something the Zend Framework people
require if you submit code to them - it's in their coding style guide.
Seems to work, but I couldn't get the habit - I hated not having
balanced elements!
On Nov 7, 11:21 am, bingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi Richard,
>
> oh Cool
For the var $name, as far as I'm aware, you can't have a space in it.
So var $name = 'Quick Notes' would be wrong.
It will (probably) fix your problem if you change the above to var
$name = 'QuickNotes';
On Nov 3, 2:14 pm, Sabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello bakers, I'm new to cake and try
All things are possible with CakePHP. Well, almost - it won't make
your dinner for you or anything.
You need to look into custom routes, which you can set up in /app/
config/routes.php - that's about as much as I can tell you, because
I'm not 100% experienced with that aspect of Cake myself yet.
Pos,
Really, you shouldn't have posted this here as it's a general PHP
question, not related to CakePHP at all.
But the thing you're doing wrong here is simple. Where you have:
echo var1;
echo var2;
You should have:
echo $var1;
echo $var2;
Variables need to be prefixed with $ wherever they a
On first glance, it sounds like you're trying to accomplish something
similar to Django's templating system. Now, I like that system - with
blocks that may or may not be replaced, being able to extend blocks,
and putting content in multiple places. I've tried to implement
something similar myself,
ead the record using the id (not comparing
> password), ans store the User record in session.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> On Sep 6, 1:33 pm, MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > Just a quick question - I've searched, but found nothing definit
Hi all,
Just a quick question - I've searched, but found nothing definitive.
I'm building my site with Cake and I've decided to use the built-in
ACL/Auth stuff rather than write my own (mostly because I'm sure
you're all a lot smarter than I am, and if it works for you, then
it'll probably work
I doubt it's a bug with Cake... if you have fields specifically set to
be unique in the database, then nothing Cake can do should allow NON-
unique fields. Seems very strange. I would imagine that the records
that appear to be non-unique actually are unique, but probably with
hidden characters or
Anna,
Do you also have the line:
echo $html->charset('UTF-8');
in your layout, as suggested above? The commands you say you have in
your layout don't get parsed by the browser, whereas the tag which is
inserted by $html->charset(); does. This could account for your
problems, if not.
Hope this
It's possible to do anything with Cake that you can with standard PHP
and then some.
Depending on how you wanted it to work, you could use $_POST, or
$_SESSION as you say.
$_POST would just involve having a bunch of hidden fields that you
store the information from the earlier steps into.
I don
Or, not.
You should be able to figure this one out for yourself with minimal
work. What, you want us to write your code for you now?
Steve
On Aug 16, 9:02 am, nirmal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please give me an example with code.
> :)
>
> On Aug 14, 11:20 pm, Ketan Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Shawn,
As Ketan says, you've slightly misunderstood how Cake's URLs map to
controllers.
In your case:
/news/edit/1
would point to (unless using routing to achieve a different result):
News Controller > Edit Action > Parameter 1 (whether that's an
article, or an item, or whatever)
/poll/edit/1
w
For the record, I think you've gone a very much more complicated way
around this than was necessary - I may be wrong, depending on exactly
what you're trying to achieve, but wouldn't it have been simpler to
hook into the SMF login/logout scripts from within your Cake apps?
That way you would still
ation-...
>
> Also how do i use the form helper without it generating all sorts of
> html i don't need like div wrappers 0_o
>
> On 15 jun, 08:28, MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, your var $validate line there should go in your model.
> > Typ
Actually, your var $validate line there should go in your model.
Typo? :)
As for the other stuff, check the links provided :)
On Jun 14, 7:50 pm, Mech7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks i found what goes in my controller±
>
> // Validator
> var $validate = array('title' => array('rule'
There's no way to do that with the built-in Session component in Cake.
At least, not directly. You'll find that your solution will involve a
User model, and probably some work with the beforeFilter in
AppController. The concept would be to store some form of timestamp in
the session, if it's older
To weigh in on this one, presumably this limitation will go away once
Cake starts returning objects instead of arrays, which (last I
checked) was still slated for 2.0? From my point of view it's not a
big deal, it's a nice-to-have rather than a must-have.
Chris is definitely correct - if you can'
The easiest technique I've seen used an additional to the database.php
in app/config, which sets the DB config based on the host. There's
some code floating around somewhere, but I can't remember where the
link was at the moment. Perhaps someone else knows what I'm talking
about!
On Jun 5, 3:34 a
>From everything I've picked up and learned over the years I've been
developing, the sort of solution you're suggesting is a definite OMG
what the hell are you doing? situation.
If you're having to deal with items that may have different
information specified, why not do something a little differ
Amen. I came from Symfony to CakePHP. Everything about Cake is so much
smoother than Symfony. From the lack of YAML to the lack of Propel,
everything fits so much better. For me it's the speed of development
that counts. I've recently finished a site for work using the 1.2
version which took less
Jyrgen,
I still don't understand why you feel the need to override Cake's
internal session handling in favour of your own.
It's simple, ok. If you want to read the existing session just use
$this->Session->read('User.username'); or $session-
>read('User.username'); in the view. Obviously this wo
It's ok guys, I was being stupid. Fixed it now, I just needed to pay
more attention to the error output PHP was giving me - it was looking
in entirely the wrong folders for my config files!
On May 11, 7:33 am, MrTufty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I know I
Hi guys,
I know I'm probably being really really thick, but I can't get my head
around something. I've been using Cake for months now - on my own
site, and also for sites at work.
All the sites at work are set up as just standard installations, with
the files unpacked inside htdocs. They work fi
27;t
> > support it. But the work has been done for you. If you copy /cake/libs/
> > view/helpers/paginator.php to /app/views/helpers/paginator.php and
> > apply the patch from this ticket:https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/2202
> > , then you can use the new pageNumbers function l
Hi all,
I've been developing a few sites in Cake for internal use, to
demonstrate its power to my bosses.
I'm using 1.2, and the Pagination helper quite a lot (for some reason
they want all the content to fit on an 800x600 screen, so I have a LOT
of multiple page sections).
Currently, the helpe
If you're not sure how to manage the layout structure yet, the last
thing you need is medium/advanced tutorials.
Cake is very simple to learn the basics of, and extremely powerful
once you've gotten your head around the conventions.
To be able to help, you'll need to say which version you're pre
; I have'nt had any and have always been setting the base param.
>
> I put my swf's inside a folder in webroot called 'flash'
>
> then I set a javascript variable with $this->webroot eg
>
> var strBase = 'webroot); ?>';
>
> - S
>
> On
Nope, they definitely don't mean stored procedures. Cookxyz's answer
would seem to be the most appropriate for what you're trying to do, in
this case. It's how I'd do it, and it does avoid having several
thousand records in memory at once... it may not be the optimal way in
this case but we don't
Hi guys...
I'm having a few issues, and I was hoping one of the more experienced/
knowledgeable people here could help me out.
On the website I'm currently developing, we have a Flash-based
location map showing all our clients sites. This Flash file is made up
of multiple movies, which each get
In this case, I reckon the problem is the same one I had with Vertrigo
- sounds like the Zend Accelerator problem that caused my Apache to
crash every time I tried to access a Cake 1.2 site. Simple solution,
just disable the Accelerator.
On Feb 19, 2:08 pm, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eas
Hi guys, thought I'd throw this out here because I simply can't get my
head around it.
I currently have user authentication working on my site, after my
problems the other day with validation. I'm happy with the way that
works, except for one thing.
In the header of my site I have a couple of li
>
> Remember, smart coders answer ten questions for every question they ask.
> So be smart, be cool, and share your knowledge.
>
> BAKE ON!
>
> blog:http://www.MarianoIglesias.com.ar
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
uot;.";
}
if ($params['message'])
{
$this->model->validationErrors[$this->name][$fieldName][]
= $params['message'];
}
}
$this->errorCount++;
return false;
}
That p
Damn, I didn't pick that one up either. Will bug fix that later on.
A possible modification would be to add an extra parameter to each
function specifying whether or not to output the message - but that
might make things more complicated than they need to be.
When I get this sorted out and worki
True, I'd not considered that part of the hackiness either. For now,
I've gone ahead and done it.
The solution isn't perfect - other tweaks will need to be made to the
other functions in the Error helper, for instance - but it does appear
to work.
Here's my code:
//error.php - modelErrors() fun
I'll take that as a challenge then :)
The workaround would be quite effective, but not ideal as you say...
One thing I considered, although it's probably not optimal, is to
store the messages in another slightly deeper array.
So when assigning the error messages, I'd use:
$this->model->validat
Excellent!
Thank you Marcel, you've been a star; my code now works as expected
and I can get on with developing the other parts of my system now. I
second the call that this level of functionality should be added to
the core - it's so useful. Potentially in time the current validation
class might
easier way to do it though.
On Feb 8, 10:07 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your reply. I did actually try that, and it worked for the
> specified controller action, but then it didn't work for other
> actions. For example, site
Thanks again :)
I'm still having a few problems, the ErrorHelper provided uses a
method of the HTML Helper which doesn't appear to exist - it outputs
by using $html->contentTag(), which doesn't work. I've looked through
the HTML Helper itself and it seems to be using output in the format
of $this
but that would cause other problems down the road, I'm sure.
Can you advise me on which bits I need to rename/change/delete to make
this work correctly?
Thanks! :)
On Feb 7, 11:23 pm, "MrTufty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Marcel -
>
> THAT is exactly the sort
I _think_, if you're going to make this work the way you expect it to,
you should specify the other controllers in routes above the final
routing.
So in your example you'd have:
$Route->connect('/members', array('controller' => 'members'));
Or something along those lines...
On Feb 8, 8:54 am,
Hi Marcel -
THAT is exactly the sort of helpful answer I was hoping for. Fantastic
bit of code, I think I'll be making use of it until such time as the
Cake core includes something comparable.
I've bookmarked the page in question, and courtesy of the Foxmarks
extension for Firefox, I'll check it
Thanks Tarique, will take a look later on.
I was hoping to avoid having to use anything not in the core code,
purely for stability later on. But if it's required... then that's
what I'll do :)
On Feb 7, 3:55 pm, "Dr. Tarique Sani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Hi guys... it seems like every time I come on here, I'm posting about
validation. Probably because, at least to me, it's one of the most
confusing parts of the framework.
I'm trying to use the new methods of validation from the 1.2 code
(current SVN version as of today), and I'm hitting brick wal
Something you should be aware of: Cake 1.2 has an issue with Vertrigo
where Apache will crash. To be fair it's not Cake's fault, it's an
incompatibility between the Zend Accelerator version and the version
of PHP they've included. Just disable it in your php.ini (for
Vertrigo's purposes, this is l
I tried EasyPHP, and also XAMPP.
Vertrigo is my favourite, because although some files get installed in
the webroot, they're optional and can be safely deleted. I noticed that
most of the other environments install phpMyAdmin into the webroot, or
create an admin/ folder in there to hold their ow
Hi gwoo, guess your response came in here before my other ones did.
Adding the trailing slash makes no difference, still crashes in the
same way. It looks like it's entirely Zend's fault in this case... they
are meant to be working on an updated version of the Optimizer which
fixes it, but no re
This may help answer some of the questions - a lot of people have seen
this issue on the Zend forums.
http://www.zend.com/forums/index.php?t=msg&th=2529&start=0&S=794daedd3f5ff2312185b52703a0f86a
At least now I know it's not just me going crazy, and that it's not
just Cake that is affected (my
And it has.
Thanks everyone for trying to help. I wish I'd thought of checking the
Windows Error Log sooner instead of looking in Apache's own log
files... would have figured this out before I'd even posted :)
It still doesn't make any sense why there would be an incompatibility
between Zend Op
Ah... I've just checked in the Windows Error Log under MMC, it's
highlighting an error with the Zend Optimizer DLL that's included. Will
try and disable that, see if that solves the problem...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscr
gwoo - this is the error that I get:
http://www.alltheusualsuspects.co.uk/users/orry/cake-vertrigo-error.png
I think Apache, or possibly a PHP module, is wiping it out even before
Apache can write to the error log.
I get this error consistently with both of the 1.2 versions I've tried
so far,
Best information I can provide is that I'm running on a default
installation of VertrigoServ 2.14 (http://vertrigo.sf.net), using the
below versions of the components:
Apache 2.0.59
PHP 5.2.0
MySQL 5.0.27
SQLite 3.3.8
PhpMyAdmin 2.9.1.1
ZendOptimizer 3.2.0
SQLiteManager 1.2.0
Cake itself is ins
And the latest SVN 4230 also crashes in the same way... just tested
now.
Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
DJ Spark contacted me off-list, advising me to check the Apache error
logs - unfortunately in this case, it didn't help at all. When Apache
is crashing here, it's crashing badly enough so that nothing is written
to the log file.
I'm now testing 4205 and 4206 side-by-side, in different folders. 4
Ok, I know 1.2 isn't out yet, and there's no rush.
But I've run into a small issue, and I was just wondering if anyone
else had seen it before reporting it on Trac.
I'm running a local test server using Vertrigo 2.14 - I've been using
this version, and older, quite successfully for the past few
I could just do that yeah - I will have to look into it some more :)
But yes, the IonCube tools do allow for the copyright notices to be
left unencrypted, as I thought.
The client is more likely to sue us if they manage to break something.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Ok. I believe the IonCube tools allow for copyright notices to be left
unencoded anyway, I'd have to check the documentation to be sure but
I'm sure it mentioned something along those lines.
On Oct 17, 3:51 pm, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll ask gwoo to weigh in here, since he's the IP
You're telling me... I've been pushing the need since I started here to
finish up a couple of other projects that are nearly ready to go
online... trouble is this client takes up so much of our time, with us
being only a small team, that we don't really get chance to tackle
anything else.
I'll be
Sadly, not my decision to make... although that checksum idea might not
be a bad one for future reference, I'll put that forward to the
directors. I don't think we'll be dumping them though, they really are
our main client at the moment and their business is worth a huge
amount. Plus they'd probab
This wouldn't strictly speaking be Ajax, at least not the way I would
do it.
I'd trap the onchange event in the select tag:
Then have some javascript code to automatically select the other
options.
You COULD do it with Ajax (and this just occurred to me while writing
this post) by putti
This might unfortunately be a sticking point.
We're in a position with one of our clients where we simply can't trust
them not to tamper with the code we've written for them. This would be
ok, but anything that goes wrong with it they blame us for even when
it's their fault. So, we use IonCube En
Luckily, I've been using Cake myself for the past couple of months - so
I'm about as much as we're likely to need for the moment :)
The other options are: keep doing things the same way they've always
been done here (we have a function library, but the functions it
includes are pretty specific to
Hi guys,
I'm working as a web developer now, and I've been trying to convince
the directors of the company that using some open-source libraries to
build our sites would be a good move. I've almost managed to convince
them that having a template engine is a good idea - with demonstrations
of what
In this case, as far as I can tell, it's actually because Vertrigo
doesn't come with the PHP CLI. You just need to install it separately,
as I mentioned in an email reply to TWIOF before. I've not used the
bake script for quite some time so I've never noticed the lack.
--~--~-~--~~--
You could also try Vertrigo http://vertrigo.sourceforge.net - I've been
using it happily for the last several months and find it very easy to
configure and use. Doesn't seem to get in the way as much as some of
the other WAMP servers.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rec
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
