On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> I wanted to ask if Maven builds are supported on OSX slave?
>
> I tested with several Maven versions
> - Maven 2.2.1
> - Maven 3.0 Beta 2
Maven 3 is not supported by Hudson yet so you will need to run it as a
free-style project. Other Ma
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi. Improving resource use is a great goal, I'm not sure it's that
> clearcut though. I'm only familiar with ZK: note that these two jobs
> are our patch queues, which only gets run when a user submits a patch
> to a jira (only a few patches o
I am trying to get Ant-Build-Matrix working, but
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/Ant/job/Ant-Build-Matrix/jdk=JDK%201.4%20%28latest%29,label=Windows/240/console
reports
Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in C:\java\jre6\lib\tools.jar
Is there something wrong with the JDK 1.4
I had thought this was just a problem with the old Hudson installation, but it is still true: clicking "Save" from a job's /configure screen takes several minutes before
the job's main page is loaded again. This should only take a second or two. Maybe someone can trace what is taking so long?
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Maven 3 is not supported by Hudson yet so you will need to run it as a
> free-style project. Other Maven versions should work on OS X. But,
> since we don't run any GUI on the OS X server, which the Apple JVM
> expects, you will need to
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> I am trying to get Ant-Build-Matrix working, but
>
> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/view/Ant/job/Ant-Build-Matrix/jdk=JDK%201.4%20%28latest%29,label=Windows/240/console
>
> reports
>
> Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in
> C:\j
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> I had thought this was just a problem with the old Hudson installation, but
> it is still true: clicking "Save" from a job's /configure screen takes
> several minutes before the job's main page is loaded again. This should only
> take a second
On 09/21/2010 03:43 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
The only JDK 1.4 available on the Windows slave is the IBM JDK [...]
Let me know if you need a Sun JDK 1.4. on there as well.
OK. For now I am just disabling this cell in the matrix configuration.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
>> I had thought this was just a problem with the old Hudson installation, but
>> it is still true: clicking "Save" from a job's /configure screen takes
>> several minutes before the jo
Ouch. It sounds like the easiest optimization would be to not do this
computation if the dependencies for the current job have not changed.
That would be easier than doing the correct thing which would be to
propagate simply changes until the system reaches something unchanged.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Ouch. It sounds like the easiest optimization would be to not do this
> computation if the dependencies for the current job have not changed.
Right, in the current code, as far as I understand it, the dependency
graph is rebuilt twice, no ma
On 09/21/2010 04:37 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
If anyone got any idea, besides asking the Hudson devs to optimize
this code
Sounds like a clear bug in Hudson; will you file it?
12 matches
Mail list logo
