RE: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-03-01 Thread Uwe Schindler
Norman Maurer [mailto:norman.mau...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 10:27 AM > To: Uwe Schindler > Cc: builds@apache.org; Apache Infrastructure > Subject: Re: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88 > > Hi Uwe, > > the lucene and hudson zone are not

Re: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-03-01 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi Uwe, the lucene and hudson zone are not the same. They are even not on the same physical server. Anyway the high load was caused by the lenya zone which is located on teh same server as the lucene zone. Hope it will work out better now.. Have fun, Norman 2010/3/1 Uwe Schindler : >> Note th

RE: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-03-01 Thread Uwe Schindler
> Note that (to answer Uwes question also) I created an Infra issue back > in > December > for a new Solaris zone for Hudson and Buildbot. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2360 > > I hope to get the new Hudson zone up and running in the next day or > two, > which should > alleviate

RE: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-02-28 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Jukka, > > The machine with all zones has now a load of 46 (!). > > I wonder if hudson.zones is on the same server. Perhaps we should > reserve also hudson.zones only for tied jobs and push all untied > builds to the Ubuntu servers (plus perhaps an experimental on-demand > EC2 slave for which

Re: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-02-28 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Gav... wrote: >> Perhaps we should >> reserve also hudson.zones only for tied jobs and push all untied >> builds to the Ubuntu servers (plus perhaps an experimental on-demand >> EC2 slave for which we may get some funding for next budget year). > > Isn't that

RE: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-02-28 Thread Gav...
> -Original Message- > From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, 28 February 2010 7:43 PM > To: builds@apache.org > Subject: Re: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88 > > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Uwe Sch

Re: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-02-28 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I killed the slave process from the zone's shell and restarted using the GUI, > but no progress. I had to repeat the same thing a few times yesterday evening, but now the slave seems to be back in business. > The machine with all zone

RE: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-02-26 Thread Uwe Schindler
ect: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88 > > Hi, > > This build [1] was stuck since yesterday. > > PS. The subversion-1.6.x-solaris job is also running on the Lucene > zone. Is this intentional? > > [1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/subversion-1.6.x- > solaris/88/ > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting

RE: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-02-26 Thread Uwe Schindler
; To: builds@apache.org > Subject: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88 > > Hi, > > This build [1] was stuck since yesterday. > > PS. The subversion-1.6.x-solaris job is also running on the Lucene > zone. Is this intentional? > > [1] http://hudson.zo

[hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88

2010-02-26 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, This build [1] was stuck since yesterday. PS. The subversion-1.6.x-solaris job is also running on the Lucene zone. Is this intentional? [1] http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/subversion-1.6.x-solaris/88/ BR, Jukka Zitting