> -----Original Message----- > From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, 28 February 2010 7:43 PM > To: builds@apache.org > Subject: Re: [hudson] Killed subversion-1.6.x-solaris build 88 > > Hi, > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > I killed the slave process from the zone's shell and restarted using > the GUI, but no progress. > > I had to repeat the same thing a few times yesterday evening, but now > the slave seems to be back in business. > > > The machine with all zones has now a load of 46 (!). > > I wonder if hudson.zones is on the same server.
Not that I can tell. Looking at the docs, Hudson is on Hyperion along with James, perl, Servicemix, quetz and confluence-test. confluence-test is not in use and due to be deleted. > Perhaps we should > reserve also hudson.zones only for tied jobs and push all untied > builds to the Ubuntu servers (plus perhaps an experimental on-demand > EC2 slave for which we may get some funding for next budget year). Isn't that defeating the purpose of projects using Hudson.zones and Lucene.zones is because they are testing on Solaris, or am I misunderstanding something> Note that (to answer Uwes question also) I created an Infra issue back in December for a new Solaris zone for Hudson and Buildbot. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2360 I hope to get the new Hudson zone up and running in the next day or two, which should alleviate pressure from the other two. Gav... > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting
