rojects were feeling the pain - they had optimized
their CI builds to execute really fast in Travis - essentially
concurrently consuming every builder. But the reality is that some
projects need more resources than others and allocating resources
appropriately becomes quite the challenge.
> Thank
se VMs, is
> there a viable workflow?
>
> On 2/3/20, 6:38 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> So this was explored. It creates some problems - first double the
> administration overhead - most of that is automated, but it means that
> our AP
and have a chance to see about the source of changes
> and flag anything questionable.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> > On Feb 3, 2020, at 6:37 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > So this was explored. It creates some problems - first double the
>
Hi Alex,
So this was explored. It creates some problems - first double the
administration overhead - most of that is automated, but it means that
our API usage doubles, and we're already hitting limits from Github.
Second - at least one CI vendor thanked us for not doing that exactly
- because th
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:37 PM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> Ray,
>
> Thanks for the offer of 50k minutes/project. That will definitely work for
> most projects.
>
> While we don't have precise measurements, some projects used *way* more
> than that within Travis last month:
>
> flink: 350k minutes
> arr
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:09 AM, andrea wrote:
>
>
> Il 24/03/2016 16:58, John Sirois ha scritto:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:54 AM, andrea
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good morning,
>>>
>>> I'm an Apache Syncope committer. With my team and with the kind help of
>>> ASF we setup a demo machine at syncop
gt; Nikhil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Blotsky [mailto:dblot...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 6:09 PM
> To: builds@apache.org
> Cc: David Nalley ; jfarr...@apache.org; Daniel Takamori
>
> Subject: RE: Self-Adding Jenkins Build Machines
&g
Hi Dmitry,
builds.a.o (like ci.a.o) is a relatively generic resources - we have
~20 Jenkins nodes and that is around to serve all of the ASF.
In the past, we've created project-specific VMs or physical machines
when they've had unusual requirements. That's been pretty mixed though
- in some cases
- ComDev
Please see:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins#How_do_I_get_an_account
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Michael Wu wrote:
> Hi Mentors,
>
> I'm a member from Apache Eagle project, and would like to subscribe my
> account to have the permission to login "Jenkins continuous-integrat
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> cloudstack...! we started making more intensive use of pull-builders. the
> old pull-request build job is replaced by a rat and an analysis job. Maybe
> others have done so as well but I am sure we (ACS) are a culprit in this.
>
I thought a
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>> On 20 Aug 2015, at 2:18 am, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>
>
>> ...how many additional
>> build nodes/executors will satiate our current demand for capacity?
>
> I know this was not aimed at me bu
Whatever we are using for DNS on those build slaves is redirecting any
NXDOMAIN to a Level3 search domain.
Is this happening on the ubuntu-* slaves or on the dynamic build slaves?
--David
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Keith W wrote:
> Hello Apache builds,
>
> We (Apache Qpid) have been seein
ck in demand -
what's changed?
--David
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:18 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Andrew:
>
> I know Jenkins tracks how big the queue is, is that something that we
> can graph over time? It'd be interesting to know how that's changed
> and will change, oth
Andrew:
I know Jenkins tracks how big the queue is, is that something that we
can graph over time? It'd be interesting to know how that's changed
and will change, otherwise we'll constantly be fighting fires here.
I'd like to have the following items graphed:
# of dynamic slaves in operation
# o
, allocate a quota to
us, and just provide us with API access rather than us having to
manage hardware and manage a new arch (a cost that OSUOSL staffers
have already paid), we can then consume that compute capacity via the
API.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 3:54 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> I'll need
I'll need to reach out to OSU and see what we have available in terms
of cooling/power available (frankly I don't know that we have much
left). Hadoop sounds like an interested party.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> IBM has loaner hardware that could be targeted towards that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley closed BUILDS-81.
--
Resolution: Fixed
abayer fixed this. Problem was due to a problem with a specific version of
java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley closed BUILDS-26.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Install openssl-devel package on Jenkins machi
FYI:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_gains_additional_travis_ci
Yes.
As a general principle we try and minimize the access that folks have
in general to external-facing systems.
Jenkins is one of several CI platforms that the ASF makes use of, and
so it doesn't make sense to hand out access needlessly to the ~5000
committers, of which only 543 have requested ac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14241211#comment-14241211
]
David Nalley commented on BUILDS-39:
Just a couple of comments.
We can provide
Hi Taegeon,
Have you seen this and followed those steps:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/github_pull_request_builds_now
--David
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Tae-Geon Um wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m trying to connect Jenkins CI to Apache REEF, an incubator project I am
> working on. I’d lik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley resolved BUILDS-33.
Resolution: Fixed
Andy:
I think this was resolved by the work done to reinstantiate the git.a.o
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Thanks for responding David!
>
> Just to clarify, we don't consider nightlys releases. They are just
> snapshots and are published under the nightly tag to npm. You need to be
> explicit if you want to download it. It is only meant for testing.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Hey Everyone,
>
> So I need to add credentials to my workspace for uploading a nightly build
> to npm for cordova.
>
> The command I need to run is `npm login` or `npm addUser`. It would prompt
> me to add my username, password and email. I thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-31?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley updated BUILDS-31:
---
Assignee: Andrew Bayer
> Jenkins builds fail on H10: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley updated BUILDS-30:
---
Assignee: Andrew Bayer
> More recent version of JDK6 including strong encryption on Ubuntu sla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1412#comment-1412
]
David Nalley commented on BUILDS-23:
[~abayer] take a look here:
h
Rajiv:
Can you take a look at BUILDS-17 - we don't seem to be able to change
ulimit on a number of machines at Yahoo!. Or rather, it's not
preserved past reboot it seems.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-17
Thanks,
--David
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:51 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> So a couple of comments.
>> 1. Would Cloudera consider sponsoring/allowing us to consume some of
>> those EC2 credits? :) I think Dan's work on image gen
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:32 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> These slaves are on-demand. If they aren't setup properly to begin
>> with, a lot of the value is lost.
>
> Question: is there any chance we can start
These slaves are on-demand. If they aren't setup properly to begin
with, a lot of the value is lost.
If it takes us 30 minutes for an on-demand slave to be ready to do any
work, especially if it was to run a 3 minute job, there was no point
in the first place.
That said, most of the work done for
Hi Alex, et al:
We've got a few other things in the wings to work on that problem as
well. Both Azure and Rackspace have donated cloud credits to be used
for build slaves. The work to have dynamic build slaves available from
Rackspace is almost done, which means as the number of jobs in the
queue
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Yeah, I'd really like to see where the ansible scripts are and how to
> run them on slaves, since I'm babysitting builds.a.o a lot of the
> time. =)
>
> A.
>
https://github.com/apache/toolchain
--David
I think Jake tried to clear up some space intermittently.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2014, at 9:27 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
>> 2014-07-07 20:59 GMT+04:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
>>> 2014-07-03 17:34 GMT+04:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
Hi!
Bu
Does it make sense to start with disabling all maven plugin-based jobs
first to see if that helps with the hanging issue?* Purging 600 jobs
seems like a rash first step if we aren't certain that it is indeed
the problem.
Obviously this will need lots of visibility prior to doing it, notice
on buil
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> So from https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-23056 it sounds like at
> least one of the problems we're having with Jenkins hanging is because of
> attempts to access the workspace of jobs through the UI - when a slave is
> slow or hang
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to reach this Buildbot URL for a couple of hours now,
> but it doesnt seem to be available:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/maven-site-staging
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
It's a known issue:
IIRC its waiting on disks
Jan and I discussed this briefly at ApacheCon and are tossing around
the idea of having Circonus monitor the status of the slave (according
to Jenkins) and perhaps to take corrective action automagically. We're
going to continue to think and work on this. Neither of us have admin
privs on the Windo
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:48 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
>
>> Om, Herve
>> What action are you specifically trying to achieve with the role you are
>> referring to as 'maintainer' ?
>>
>
> Things like setting up builds which require more tha
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/6/9 David Nalley :
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> In your job configuration in advanced git section: check the option
>>> called "Skip internal tag"
>>> That
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> In your job configuration in advanced git section: check the option
> called "Skip internal tag"
> That must fix that normally
>
Something has changed in the config - as this has been enabled across
what appears to be all of the cloudstack job
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Any chance I can have publican installed on one of the Ubuntu 12.04 slaves?
>>
>
> Installed on vesta.a.o (ubuntu2).
>
Niklas:
Thanks for picking
Hi folks:
Any chance I can have publican installed on one of the Ubuntu 12.04 slaves?
CloudStack uses publican to validate/test/build its DocBook XML-based
documentation.
--David
44 matches
Mail list logo
