On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 22:59:06 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this PR that excludes `libjsig` from being statically linked
> with `static-jdk` `java` launcher by default. Please see details in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351309 description and comments. Thanks
This LGTM. Perh
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 08:41:06 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> I wonder how useful this OPT_SPEED_SRC list is these days
I suspect not useful at all. Too much has changed. This kind of list should be
examined each time we update a toolchain. And in principle any new file should
be evaluated to se
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:52:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>
> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>
> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mos
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 07:21:17 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After [JDK-8345627](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345627), the minumum
> gcc version should be 12.
> [JDK-8345627](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345627) add gcc compile
> option -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern for d
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:12:54 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> It shouldn't be, unless you have actually tried building the JDK with a lower
> version and it failed.
I do obscene building jdk failure after
[JDK-8345627](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345627) with gcc14(riscv
cross compiler) an
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:52:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>
> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>
> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mos
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:22:43 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This PR fix the makefile bug when there is no gtest 'disable tests' then
> report syntax error.
>
> Before this PR makefile used below command to get the 'disable tests' number,
> when there is no 'YOU HAVE [0-9]+ DISABLED TEST'
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 14:10:07 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Revert regex change in if expr
>
> Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer).
Thanks @erikj79 for the reviews and suggestio
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:11:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> JvmFeatures.gmk contains a file list OPT_SPEED_SRC , the list contains files
> that have to be optimized for speed when the other files are optimized for
> binary size.
> However some non present files are mentioned and should be remove
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:11:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> JvmFeatures.gmk contains a file list OPT_SPEED_SRC , the list contains files
> that have to be optimized for speed when the other files are optimized for
> binary size.
> However some non present files are mentioned and should be remove
This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mostly files with
`x86_32` in their name. Those are only built when buil
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:52:49 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> Harfbuzz upgraded to v10.4.0
>
> File changes -
>
> **Newly added files**
>
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/VARC.hh
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/coord-setter.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-decycler.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-geometry.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-ot-var-v
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:52:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>
> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>
> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mos
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:52:49 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> Harfbuzz upgraded to v10.4.0
>
> File changes -
>
> **Newly added files**
>
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/VARC.hh
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/coord-setter.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-decycler.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-geometry.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-ot-var-v
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 07:54:51 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> > > After [JDK-8345627](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8345627), the
> > > minumum gcc version should be 12
> >
> >
> > Or JDK-8345627 change should only be enabled when gcc version is >= 12.
>
> JDK-8345627 has already check the gcc co
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:11:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> JvmFeatures.gmk contains a file list OPT_SPEED_SRC , the list contains files
> that have to be optimized for speed when the other files are optimized for
> binary size.
> However some non present files are mentioned and should be remove
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:11:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> JvmFeatures.gmk contains a file list OPT_SPEED_SRC , the list contains files
> that have to be optimized for speed when the other files are optimized for
> binary size.
> However some non present files are mentioned and should be remove
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:11:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> JvmFeatures.gmk contains a file list OPT_SPEED_SRC , the list contains files
> that have to be optimized for speed when the other files are optimized for
> binary size.
> However some non present files are mentioned and should be remove
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 02:10:34 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This PR fix the makefile bug when there is no gtest 'disable tests' then
>> report syntax error.
>>
>> Before this PR makefile used below command to get the 'disable tests'
>> number, when there is no 'YOU HAVE [0-9]+ DISABLED
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:52:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>
> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>
> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mos
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 19:00:49 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
>> Harfbuzz upgraded to v10.4.0
>>
>> File changes -
>>
>> **Newly added files**
>>
>> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/VARC.hh
>> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/coord-setter.hh
>> libharfbuzz/hb-decycler.hh
>> libharfbuzz/hb-geometry.hh
>> libharfbuzz/
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:52:49 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> Harfbuzz upgraded to v10.4.0
>
> File changes -
>
> **Newly added files**
>
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/VARC.hh
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/coord-setter.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-decycler.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-geometry.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-ot-var-v
Add an .editorconfig to define indentation, trim trailing whitespace and open
curly brace position for C++ and Java.
This allows various editors to easily infer basics of the coding style.
-
Commit messages:
- add editorconfig for better indentation detection
Changes: https://git.o
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:52:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>
> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>
> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mos
Please review this PR that excludes `libjsig` from being statically linked with
`static-jdk` `java` launcher by default. Please see details in
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8351309 description and comments. Thanks
-
Commit messages:
- Filter out libjsig by default for static
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:52:49 GMT, Harshitha Onkar wrote:
> Harfbuzz upgraded to v10.4.0
>
> File changes -
>
> **Newly added files**
>
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/VARC.hh
> libharfbuzz/OT/Var/VARC/coord-setter.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-decycler.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-geometry.hh
> libharfbuzz/hb-ot-var-v
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:52:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>
> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>
> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mos
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:52:16 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>
> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>
> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts, mos
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 23:19:50 GMT, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> This PR implements JEP 503: Remove the 32-bit x86 Port.
>>
>> The JEP is proposed to target 25, we would not integrate until JEP is ready.
>> Reviews are appreciated meanwhile.
>>
>> This is only the removal of obvious 32-bit x86 parts
29 matches
Mail list logo
