On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:15:08 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Two groups of broken links appeared in the latest JDK docs, broken links to
>> man pages and broken ietf links.
>>
>> - The windows tools markdown files were not being converted to HTML because
>> they were placed under `windows/ma
> When running HotSpot jtreg tests in the "AOT mode", for example:
>
>
> make test JTREG=AOT_JDK=true TEST=open/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/stringtable
>
>
> Before this PR, in the test set up phase, we record several AOT configuration
> files by running a few separate Java tools (javac, javap,
> Hi all,
>
> Several JMH tests fails 'Cannot invoke "java.io.InputStream.available()"
> because "is" is null', because the file
> 'build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/test/micro/benchmarks.jar' missing
> the required xml input file defined by
> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/javax/xml/Abst
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:18:12 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> SendaoYan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use SetupCopyFiles macro to copy the dependency files
>
> make/test/BuildMicrobenchmark.gmk line 127:
>
>> 125:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:50:57 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.5.1.
>>
>> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
>> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
>> addition, the `require
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 03:21:37 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Several JMH tests fails 'Cannot invoke "java.io.InputStream.available()"
>> because "is" is null', because the file
>> 'build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/test/micro/benchmarks.jar' missing
>> the required xml input fil
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 05:05:17 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> If anyone changes these tests on the functional side we'd silently break.
After this PR, if the dependency XML files been removed will make `make
test-image` fails. So maybe we do not need a new unit test to guard it.
> Perhaps needs a
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:26:03 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.5.1.
>
> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
> addition, the `requiredVers
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 19:41:51 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review this change that adds a `linux-x86-static` job in GHA. The job
> builds the `static-jdk-image` release binary on linux-x64. Please see
> https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2025-February/048830.html for
> some addit
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:23:05 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the right way to solve this. I would really like
> someone more familiar with the microbenchmarks to weigh in on how this was
> originally meant to work.
Hi, @cl4es, Could you take took this PR.
-
PR
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:40:12 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Ioi Lam has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Move the contents of SetupAOT.gmk back to RunTests.gmk, as it is not
>> necessary to have the definitions in a stand-alone
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:00:01 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Currently we tune for older Power8 CPUs in the libjvm build, this should be
> adjusted to current Power10.
>
> We do not set (yet) mcpu / mtune in the other native compilation units in the
> linux ppc64le build; this should we reconsi
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:00:01 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Currently we tune for older Power8 CPUs in the libjvm build, this should be
> adjusted to current Power10.
>
> We do not set (yet) mcpu / mtune in the other native compilation units in the
> linux ppc64le build; this should we reconsi
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:15:36 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> The fix add remaining classes to the testlibrary jar and fix some warnings in
> security-related classes.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 62d93f2a
Author:Leonid Mesnik
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/com
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 07:21:27 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Several JMH tests fails 'Cannot invoke "java.io.InputStream.available()"
> because "is" is null', because the file
> 'build/linux-x86_64-server-release/images/test/micro/benchmarks.jar' missing
> the required xml input file defi
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:04:42 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> When using a gcc 13.2.0 devkit, the Linux builds (x86_64 and ppc64le) fail
> with warnings as errors in case that ubsan is enabled.
> The 2 warnings as errors are about memset usages ; we see those issues with
> gcc 13.2 but did not se
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:50:57 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.5.1.
>>
>> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
>> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
>> addition, the `require
Please review following trivial PR that fix library build by adding
--add-exports.
Testing: tier1
-
Commit messages:
- Added javac opts
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23680/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23680&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.ope
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:49:27 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> Please review following trivial PR that fix library build by adding
> --add-exports.
> Testing: tier1
Seems reasonable - and trivial
Thanks
-
Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jd
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:27:58 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> When running HotSpot jtreg tests in the "AOT mode", for example:
>>
>>
>> make test JTREG_AOT_JDK=true open/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/stringtable
>>
>>
>> Before this PR, in the test set up phase, we record several AOT
>> configuration fil
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:49:27 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
> Please review following trivial PR that fix library build by adding
> --add-exports.
> Testing: tier1
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 2d03bd00
Author:Leonid Mesnik
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commi
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:05:06 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I don't object to changing this test but it might be simpler to just skip
> this test, once we can use `@requires !jdk.static`.
Thanks, @AlanBateman. I think skipping this test for static JDK sounds
reasonable to me, since this test seems
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:22:26 GMT, Leonid Mesnik wrote:
>> The fix add remaining classes to the testlibrary jar and fix some warnings
>> in security-related classes.
>
> Leonid Mesnik has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
> - added
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 22:53:29 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote:
> > btw for libjdwp with lto enabled (have to modify the make settings because
> > this is not supported out of the box) I get
> > 1.8M ./lib/libjdwp.debuginfo 280K ./lib/libjdwp.so
> > This looks pretty good compared to HIGH or standard (LO
> When running HotSpot jtreg tests in the "AOT mode", for example:
>
>
> make test JTREG_AOT_JDK=true open/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/stringtable
>
>
> Before this PR, in the test set up phase, we record several AOT configuration
> files by running a few separate Java tools (javac, javap, jlin
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:31:52 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> Please review the fix to make
> `java/lang/String/nativeEncoding/StringPlatformChars.java` jtreg test:
>
> - Lookup `JNU_GetStringPlatformChars`, `JNU_ClassString` and
> `JNU_NewStringPlatform` dynamically
> - Remove `#include "jni_util.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:50:57 GMT, Christian Stein wrote:
>> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7.5.1.
>>
>> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the
>> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In
>> addition, the `require
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:00:01 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Currently we tune for older Power8 CPUs in the libjvm build, this should be
> adjusted to current Power10.
>
> We do not set (yet) mcpu / mtune in the other native compilation units in the
> linux ppc64le build; this should we reconsi
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:50:11 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>>> > Member
>>>
>>> Fixing the JVM under LTO is likely to be a heavy undertaking, much more so
>>> than just unbreaking compilation and linking of the JVM (Ignoring that the
>>> JVM later crashes when the newly compiled JDK is used to
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:46:56 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
>> When running HotSpot jtreg tests in the "AOT mode", for example:
>>
>>
>> make test JTREG_AOT_JDK=true open/test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/stringtable
>>
>>
>> Before this PR, in the test set up phase, we record several AOT
>> configuration fil
30 matches
Mail list logo
