Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4]

2024-11-17 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:50:21 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> Currently, the man pages are stored as troff (a text format) in the open >> repo, and a content-wise identical copy is stored as markdown (another text >> format) in the closed repo. >> >> Since markdown is preferred to troff in te

Re: RFR: 8306579: Consider building with /Zc:throwingNew [v2]

2024-11-17 Thread Julian Waters
> [JDK-8305590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305590) removed > `-fcheck-new` when building with gcc. It turns out Visual Studio has a > similar option, though inverted in behavior and default. > > It seems like /Zc:throwingNew- (the default) corresponds to gcc -fcheck-new, > and /Zc:thr

Re: RFR: 8306579: Consider building with /Zc:throwingNew

2024-11-17 Thread Kim Barrett
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 06:13:46 GMT, Phil Race wrote: >> [JDK-8305590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305590) removed >> `-fcheck-new` when building with gcc. It turns out Visual Studio has a >> similar option, though inverted in behavior and default. >> >> It seems like /Zc:throwingNew- (t

Re: RFR: 8306579: Consider building with /Zc:throwingNew

2024-11-17 Thread Kim Barrett
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:22:40 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: >> src/java.desktop/windows/native/libawt/windows/awt_new.cpp line 127: >> >>> 125: } >>> 126: #endif >>> 127: >> >> I don't see you commenting on this which is a "huge" deal as it seems like >> it changes memory allocation for a lot of the

Re: RFR: 8306579: Consider building with /Zc:throwingNew

2024-11-17 Thread Kim Barrett
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:30:05 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: > [JDK-8305590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305590) removed > `-fcheck-new` when building with gcc. It turns out Visual Studio has a > similar option, though inverted in behavior and default. > > It seems like /Zc:throwingNew- (th