On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:30:05 GMT, Julian Waters <jwat...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> [JDK-8305590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305590) removed 
> `-fcheck-new` when building with gcc. It turns out Visual Studio has a 
> similar option, though inverted in behavior and default.
> 
> It seems like /Zc:throwingNew- (the default) corresponds to gcc -fcheck-new, 
> and /Zc:throwingNew corresponds to -fno-check-new (the default).
> 
> The Visual Studio documentation strongly recommends using /Zc:throwingNew if 
> possible, as turning it off (the default) seriously bloats code and inhibits 
> optimizations.
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zc-throwingnew-assume-operator-new-throws?view=msvc-170
> 
> As mentioned in [JDK-8305590](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305590), 
> the standard says that an allocation function can report allocation failure 
> either by returning null (when it must have a nothrow exception 
> specification), or by throwing `std::bad_alloc` (so obviously must not be 
> declared as non-throwing). HotSpot allocation functions terminate the program 
> instead of throwing on allocation failure, so similarly don't need the result 
> checked for null.
> 
> The documentation for /Zc:throwingNew is somewhat vague and confusing, so 
> some investigation is probably needed to verify it really has the desired 
> effect for us.

Looks good.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by kbarrett (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22039#pullrequestreview-2440911290

Reply via email to