Per Theo's comment here, maybe this really doesn't matter :
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=172426918805083&w=2
Are you actually seeing identical values from arc4random(3) from VMs
launched from the same snapshot?
On Saturday, August 24, 2024, Bryan Stenson wrote:
> I've not tested this, bu
On 24/08/24(Sat) 13:14, Hugh Graham wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 09:31:43PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 24/08/24(Sat) 12:09, Hugh Graham wrote:
> > > The machine that slowly received the ports tree crashed upon reboot,
> > > and I have included the traces. It was running 7.5-stable at
Hello,
I did check things with tpcdump. And it looks like pf(4) is doing
the right thing. let me explain.
To play with pf(4) I'm using same network set up
as we use for regression testing [1]
[1]
https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/regress/sys/net/pf_forward/Makefile
> >How-To-Repeat:
Hi list!
I am puzzled about this as to why - this has kept on happening to me for many
months if not year(s).
It has also happened across many different scripts of mine.
So upon exit of my scripts, sometimes, and I mean sometimes like 1 out of 20 or
so runs of my scripts, it happens.
How I ran t
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 24/08/24(Sat) 13:14, Hugh Graham wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 09:31:43PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 24/08/24(Sat) 12:09, Hugh Graham wrote:
> > > > The machine that slowly received the ports tree crashed upon re
Hi,
Earlier this week I committed this change in GNU Inetutils [1]. When
sending the 'send dont ' telnet command, the value is not checked
for overflow. Likewise for 'do', 'will', 'wont'.
Another GNU Inetutils developer segfaults doing 'send dont 2147483648'
and 'send dont 9223372034707292160' bu
Noone uses telnet, we (mostly) killed it!
https://www.openbsd.org/images/tshirt-9b.jpg
There is no way in heck this code is going to be converted in OpenBSD
to use strtol(), which is even more willing to eat junk.
In our world, someone should adapt this to strtonum(), which is
a cynical string t
"Theo de Raadt" writes:
> Noone uses telnet, we (mostly) killed it!
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/images/tshirt-9b.jpg
>
> There is no way in heck this code is going to be converted in OpenBSD
> to use strtol(), which is even more willing to eat junk.
I don't disagree. Especially on the strtol par
