Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-06 Thread William Rusnack
The great pain and setbacks is the trifecta of the documentation stating that `request` has many options that it does not, the parser not rejecting unsupported request options, and the configuration payload receiver not warning about receiving unsupported payloads. Then there is a string of bug

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-06 Thread William Rusnack
Thanks. > On Jan 6, 2025, at 8:18 PM, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 01:56:27 +0100, > William Rusnack wrote: >> >> Lastly, if there is not opposition to receiving more legitimate bug reports, >> I am planning on auditing unbound and nsd soon. >> > > Probably I missread y

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-06 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 01:56:27 +0100, William Rusnack wrote: > > Lastly, if there is not opposition to receiving more legitimate bug reports, > I am planning on auditing unbound and nsd soon. > Probably I missread you, but I understand it as you plan to send it here. Any reason to do it instead h

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-06 Thread William Rusnack
To Stuart, Thank you for your civility. For the copyright, the code changes I have submitted are minimal and follow the patterns that already exist in the source; the documentation submissions are minimal but I could rewrite them by hand if necessary. I have not submitted questions with the bu

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2025/01/05 19:46, William Rusnack wrote: > To Peter Hessle, > > I said that I use (utilize) multiple AIs but I do not solely > rely on them for generating the content. I have: > - actually been using iked > - looked into the sources extensively > - found multiple actual issues > > Believe me,

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-05 Thread William Rusnack
To Peter Hessle, I said that I use (utilize) multiple AIs but I do not solely rely on them for generating the content. I have: - actually been using iked - looked into the sources extensively - found multiple actual issues Believe me, I do not want to be looking into the iked source code, but mul

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-05 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2025 Jan 05 (Sun) at 13:30:22 -0500 (-0500), William Rusnack wrote: :I am using multiple ai assistants Then go away, your changes are not welcome and are a pure waste of time.

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-05 Thread William Rusnack
I am using multiple ai assistants but ChatGPT is not one of them. Also I do not understand your statement > I think most people with privileges to commit fixes generally understand > the risks and benefits of updating a man page. This section of documentation has wasted days of my time due to it

Re: iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-04 Thread Tobias Heider
On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 04:40:50PM GMT, William Rusnack wrote: > Synopsis: iked.conf(5) needs clearer documentation about which configuration > payload options are supported when receiving configurations and their system > effects. > Description: > The documentation of configuration payload

iked.conf(5): configuration payload support and effects need better documentation

2025-01-04 Thread William Rusnack
Synopsis: iked.conf(5) needs clearer documentation about which configuration payload options are supported when receiving configurations and their system effects. Description: The documentation of configuration payloads in iked.conf(5) has two issues: 1. Missing Implementation D