On 2025/01/05 19:46, William Rusnack wrote: > To Peter Hessle, > > I said that I use (utilize) multiple AIs but I do not solely > rely on them for generating the content. I have: > - actually been using iked > - looked into the sources extensively > - found multiple actual issues > > Believe me, I do not want to be looking into the iked source > code, but multiple sloppy implementation and documentation > issues in it have caused me great pain and setbacks. > > I have not been able to find any stated policy that AI cannot > be utilized for assistance in contributions. > > If you have problems with the actaul submission from my > indepth audit on configuration payloads then please be > specific.
Apart from anything else, the copyright status of llm-generated code and doc changes is unclear. As far as I'm aware provenance isn't usually taken into account by those systems and there isn't usually an option to use only sources with an acceptable license. Also a dump of 20-odd reports in a short period whatever the reason is hard to deal with. Worse when it's a mixture of some things which are bugs, some things which are questionable, and some are misunderstandings (but we don't know whether that's a misunderstanding by you or whatever system you used to "help"). If you could explain which of the issues that you reported have caused "great pain and setbacks" that would help prioritise things because I'm not seeing which of the reports where that might apply.
