Re: FDISK versus PARTED

2007-02-06 Thread Debarshi Ray
do you mean FDISK? I can't find FSDISK. There is no program called FSDISK. There are 'fdisk' and 'sfdisk'. PARTED has worked well for me all the time. That is great. :-) I encountered only one peculiar problem with PARTED: Starting and end addresses "sometimes" are accepted only, in very c

Re: fdisk

2006-05-25 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:54:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello Robert, > > news on GNU fdisk: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 05:25:37PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > I'm afraid I don't have time to help actively (other than testing it). > > However, if you need a platform for b

Re: fdisk

2006-05-25 Thread leslie . polzer
Hello Robert, news on GNU fdisk: On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 05:25:37PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > I'm afraid I don't have time to help actively (other than testing it). > However, if you need a platform for beta-testing, Debian GNU/kFreeBSD > is a good place: Because the "classical" util-linu

Re: fdisk

2006-04-21 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:14:05AM -0500, Harley D. Eades III wrote: > > Do you think it can go in trunk soon? > Currently it is not totally ready, we are still working on some of the little > things, > like error messages and some other large work like creating gfdisk along > with it, this will

Re: fdisk

2006-04-19 Thread Harley D. Eades III
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 09:19 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi! Hi! > I've seen your fdisk branch in parted svn. I'm interested in it to have a > replacement for util-linux fdisk on GNU/kFreeBSD. Wonderful! > Do you think it can go in trunk soon? Currently it is not totally ready, we are still w