I'm not sure I can. It is software to recover/flash the hardware. I wish I
knew how to fix it.
Georgia
On Jun 5, 2013 11:18 AM, "Brian C. Lane" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:02:22PM -1000, Georgia Nelsen wrote:
> > version 1.8.9
> > Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_co
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:02:22PM -1000, Georgia Nelsen wrote:
> version 1.8.9
> Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2) at
> clac.c:378 in function fat_cluster_to_frag() failed.
>
> thanks
> Georgia
Thanks for the report, but v1.8.9 is *really* old at this point. You
s
On 18 March 2012 03:09, Nileshwar, Siddharth wrote:
> I received this message for version 1.8.9
This version is very, very old and a lot of problems have been fixed since then.
I recommend to try the latest version (3.1 as of now).
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
BR Håkon Løvdal
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 08:57:41PM -0400, HyoGi Sim wrote:
> It printed the following message and is dead.
>
> ===
>
> Backtrace has 13 calls on stack:
> 13: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0(ped_assert+0x2b) [0xb76c1733]
> 12: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0(+0x
p...@tommy-wurzbacher.de wrote:
> I've tried to flash my HP TouchPad with HP's tool webosdoctor and got this
> error:
>
> 28.08.2011 00:01:08 com.palm.nova.installer.recoverytool.CardController
> logPrint
> INFO: Trenchcoat: A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the
> web site of pa
This has been fixed in parted v2.4
The problem is that parted has failed to guess the CHS layout of the
disk. You can work around this problem (assuming you can erase the data
on the disk) by removing the partitioning and re-partitioning it with
parted.
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/diskname bs=1M cou
Richard Gradle wrote:
> While trying to install linux software (LXDE-PCLinuxOS) on my computer, I
> encountered the following that requested that I send an error report. I was
> trying to install the software on a HDD that was already partitioned as an
> ext4
> drive. The installer crashed befo
Thanks a lot for your quick and clear answer, I´ll try.
2011/2/13 Curtis Gedak
> On 11-02-13 03:43 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
>
>> Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with parted
>> or is it impossible?
>>
>
> Carlos,
>
> I can see at least two possible solutions:
On 11-02-13 03:43 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with
parted or is it impossible?
Carlos,
I can see at least two possible solutions:
OPTION A)
One work-around is as follows:
1) Copy any data you have on this disk device to anoth
Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with parted or
is it impossible?
2011/2/11 Curtis Gedak
> Carlos,
>
> Using the equations noted in the probe_partition_for_geom() method in the
> parted file libparted/labels/dos.c, I ran the calculations using the values
> from the MB
Carlos,
Using the equations noted in the probe_partition_for_geom() method in
the parted file libparted/labels/dos.c, I ran the calculations using the
values from the MBR you provided.
Variable Description / Calculation Value
c Starting cylinder 1
h Starting head 0
s Starting sector – 1 = 0
a
Curtis,
Here you have...and I paste its content just in case you prefer not to open
the file:
FA 31 C0 8E D8 8E D0 BC 00 7C 89 E6 06 57 8E C0 .1...|...W..
0010 FB FC BF 00 06 B9 00 01 F3 A5 EA 1F 06 00 00 52 ...R
0020 52 B4 41 BB AA 55 31 C9 30 F6 F9 CD 13 72 1
Carlos,
Would you be able to provide a copy of the Master Boot Record which is
contained in the first sector of the device?
You can capture the Master Boot Record in a file with the following command:
NOTE: Be extra careful to type this command in properly, otherwise loss
of data could resul
Yes. But fdisk output is:
*17 heads*, 17 sectors per track
I supposed that that was the value to compare with head_size<=63 but I must
be wrong.
2011/2/2 Brian C. Lane
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:47:21PM +0100, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Version 2.3
> >
> > Error message
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:47:21PM +0100, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Version 2.3
>
> Error message: The sentence (head_size <= 63) in
> ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:662 in the function
> probe_partition_for_geom() has failed.
> Aborted
>
This is yet another example of a flash
My apologies for sending this again. But I have not received any answer
(perhaps my fault, because i ask for entering the mailing list at the same
time...). If someone sent it I would ask him to send it again.
I add now the output of fdisk
$ sudo fdisk -l -u /dev/sdg
Disco /dev/sdg: 3997 MB,
holger.spangenb...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
> I011-29:/ # partprobe
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
> http://
> www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of what could be
> useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to bug-part
David Johnson wrote:
> /media/ user
> Backtrace has 11 calls on stack:
> 11: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0(ped_assert+0x29) [0xb7264b29]
> 10: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0xb7299cd5]
> 9: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0xb729ab47]
> 8: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0xb729bf2a]
> 7: /usr/lib/libparted.so.0 [0
JJK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of
> parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more
> informations of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email
> a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the
Jim Meyering wrote:
Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As requested by the parted program, I'm sending this bug report.
Thanks for the report.
Since that version is so old, and since the bug matches
a common signature, I think it's been fixed for a while.
Yeah, I suspected as much. For
Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As requested by the parted program, I'm sending this bug report.
>
> The device in question is an AoE device, built from 10 400GB hard
> drives, configured into a RAID10 array. There are *no* existing
> partition tables or GPT disk labels on the device.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> GNU Parted 1.6.19
...
> Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:582 in function
> probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
> Ignore/Cancel?
Thanks for reporting that.
1.6.19 is pretty old.
I'm pretty sure that particular bug is fixed in newer versions.
The
Bonie, could you please try the latest stable release -- 1.8.8? It
looks like you were having problems using GPT disk-labels.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7
Key server: pgp.mit.edu
___
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http:/
Oleg, you are using really old version of GNU Parted. We are just
about to release version 1.8.8. You could try some later version from
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
Thanks for the report anyway. :-)
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7
Key server: pgp.mit.edu
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl-Heinz Hoffmann) writes:
> Assertion (disk != NULL) at ../..libparted/disk.c:1319 in function
> ped_disk_next_partition() failed.
This do not includes the version number but if it's not our lastest
release (1.8.7), please try it and report a new bug if it still happens.
--
On 19/02/07, Naved Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Please chek this error.
A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the version (1.6.19) and the following
message:Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:582 i
Hi,
Thanks for the report.
I got the following message when repartitioning my disk.
Could you give us some more details about what you were doing?
You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.21), and the following
message:
I
Alex Prinsier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed qtparted on ubuntu edgy, ran it as root and I got this
> error:
>
> Error: Can't have overlapping partitions.
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
> http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parte
You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.3), and the following
message:
Please use the latest stable release 1.8.2, let us know if this is solved.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
After the game the king and the pawn go into the same
Dan Bretherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Parted developers,
>
> Please note the following error message, which appeared on starting parted.
Hello Dan,
Please, in your report there's no evidence of what version of Parted
you were using. Please, test if this specific problem wasn't fix on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to
>bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.19), and the following
>message:
Please, try to reproduce it using our 1.8.0 release since it has a lot
of bugfixes and a backtrace feature too so wi
On 31/01/06, Conor Dowdall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.22) and the following
message:Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at
disk_dos.c:593 in function probe_partition_for_
On 19/07/06, El Mehdi Taileb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
print command while inspecting a usb flash disk (/dev/sdd).
Version: 1.6.22
Message: Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:593
in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
Hi. This version of parted is old and
"Michael Cormier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Version (1.6.21) Assertion (head_size <= 63) at
> ../../liparted/disk_dos.c:573 in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
Could you please try the new version of parted? we're on 1.7.1 now
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
---
On 20/04/06, Alexey Snitko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> version 1.6.21
>
> Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A)
> at ../../libparted/disk_dos.c:586 in function probe_partition_for_geom()
> failed.
Hi. According to http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/faq.html
this is already fixed. Please
On 04/04/06, Michael Chajter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bug has been detected in GNU parted.
>
> (1.6.22) and the following message:Assertion ((C * heads + H) * Sectors + S
> == A) at disk_dos.c:586 in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
>
Hi. This version of parted is old, according
Please upgrade to latest version of parted and gparted.
Even better, run gparted from a livecd (e.g.
http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php )
cheers,
plors
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:30 +0100, Jean-Francois Cardoso wrote:
> james:~ $ sudo gparted
> A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Pleas
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:51:10 +
William Setters > wrote:
| VERSION 1.6.22
|
| This message appeared when I attempted to "print".
|
| Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:593 in function
| probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
Fixed in 1.6.25.1.
Leslie
--
gpg --ke
Hi Dirk,
try upgrading to 1.6.25 please.
cheers,
plors
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 23:02 +0100, Dirk Röser wrote:
> Version (1.6.21)
> Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A)
> at ../../libparted/disk_dos.c:586 in function probe_partition_for_geom()
> failed.
>
>
>
> ___
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 23:41 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Error: Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition.
> A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to
> bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.20) and the following
> message:Assertion (disk != NULL) a
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:11:40 +0300 Nishant Tharani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a bug:
> A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to
> bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.21) and the following
> message:
>
> Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at
> ..
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Joerg Balsiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Assertion ((c * heads + h) * sectors + s == a) at disk_dos.c:603 in function
> probe_partition_for_geom() failed
>
>
> The above message appeared after trying to remove a reiser4 partition.
Hi,
This should be
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:42:08PM -0300, jpalumbo wrote:
> bug message:
> The sector size on /dev/hdc is 2048 bytes. Parted is known not to work
> properly with drives with sector sizes other than 512 bytes.
Is hdc per chance your cdrom drive ? Or could you give more info about the
exact kind of
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:06:20 +0200 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Was checking out qtparted; had it view the usb drive on which I keep my
> Knoppix config, and the console showed this:
>
> "A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to
> bug-parted@gnu.org containing the ve
Hi Andrew,
> I meant to say "sfdisk -d", not "sfdisk -l".
Here is what you asked.
Thanks for your support !
---
$ sudo sfdisk -d
Warning: extended partition does not start at a cylinder boundary.
DOS and Linux will interpret the contents differently.
# partition table of /dev/hda
unit: secto
Hi again,
I meant to say "sfdisk -d", not "sfdisk -l".
Thanks,
Andrew
___
Bug-parted mailing list
Bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
Hi Xavier,
Thanks for the bug report.
Could you please also send the output of
sfdisk -l /dev/sda
Thanks!
Andrew
___
Bug-parted mailing list
Bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
Hi Linas,
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 05:36:07PM +0300, Linas Gricius wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo sfdisk -l /dev/hda
Can you please send the output of "sfdisk -d /dev/hda"?
Thanks,
Andrew
___
Bug-parted mailing list
Bug-parted@gnu.org
http://l
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 10:33:54PM -0500, Robert wrote:
> You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] the version (1.6.19), and the following
> message:
>
> Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:582 in function
> probe_parti
49 matches
Mail list logo
