i've been in the reply-to-sender habit so long that i'm afraid that
it's become almost hard-wired but i will do my best. :) thanks for the
help and hope your day goes well.
On 02/14/2018 01:04 PM, Phil Susi wrote:
On 2/14/2018 3:57 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
i had previously gone into parted
On 2/14/2018 3:57 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> i had previously gone into parted and then used the select device
> command from there and the crash happened. when i tried the "(sudo)
> parted /dev/sde print" string it worked properly. i then started parted
> and tried to select sde and found it was alr
On 2/14/2018 3:31 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> sudo dd if=/dev/sde count=1 | hd
>
> 1+0 records in
> 1+0 records out
> 512 bytes copied, 0.000549976 s, 931 kB/s
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ||
> *
> 0200
Weird... but parted /dev/sde print crashes?
sudo dd if=/dev/sde count=1 | hd
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
512 bytes copied, 0.000549976 s, 931 kB/s
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
||
*
0200
On 02/14/2018 12:23 PM, Phil Susi wrote:
On 2/14/2018 3:22 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
no partition t
no partition table. i've not used parted before and wanted to only do
the non-destructive things that were available, like print and select
device and help. i've got another disc (sdh) with no partition table in
the same machine and it can be selected by parted without crashing. i
had selected
On 2/14/2018 3:22 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> no partition table. i've not used parted before and wanted to only do
> the non-destructive things that were available, like print and select
> device and help. i've got another disc (sdh) with no partition table in
> the same machine and it can be selecte
On 2/14/2018 2:36 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> chris@bas2:~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sde
>
> Disk /dev/sde: 7.3 TiB, 8001563222016 bytes, 15628053168 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 byte
On 2/13/2018 1:33 PM, Alex March wrote:
>
>
> - Original message -
> From: Alex March
> To: bugs-par...@gnu.org
> Subject: parted 3.2: Error: FPE_INTDIV (Integer: divide by zero)[1]4833
> abort (core dumped)
> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:32:03 +
>
> Hi,
>
> Latest 3.2 version.
On 1/2/2018 12:27 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> This indicates that whatever created your partition layout didn't leave
> enough metadata space for the extended partition. There is nothing we
> can do for this.
We *can* locate the EBR elsewhere like most other utilities do. I just
haven't gotten aro
On 2/12/2018 5:55 PM, Chris Hartt wrote:
> parted 3.2 error message 2/12/18 Ubuntu 16.04
>
> Assertion (max_size > 0) at ../../libparted/cs/constraint.c:71 in
> function ped_constraint_init() failed.
Can you provide the output of fdisk -l on this disk?
On 12/29/2017 9:00 AM, Ceriel Jacobs wrote:
> eMMC spec 4.5 has a tiny (2MiB or 4MiB) Replay Protected Memory Block.
> As well as UFS and NVMe have support for RPMB.
This came to my attention a while back elsewhere.. probably the debian
bug tracker. The question is how to identify such a device s
11 matches
Mail list logo
