[bug #54870] Defining macro with name of built-in function

URL: Summary: Defining macro with name of built-in function Project: make Submitted by: jftrudeau Submitted on: Sun 21 Oct 2018 01:59:36 AM UTC Severity: 3 - Normal Item

[bug #56025] .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls

URL: Summary: .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls Project: make Submitted by: jftrudeau Submitted on: Thu 28 Mar 2019 08:09:13 PM UTC Severity: 3 - No

[bug #56025] .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #56025 (project make): I now realize that the TAB, could be inserted, and then removed by filter-out. ___ Reply to this item at: __

[bug #56025] .RECIPEPREFIX doesn't parse line continuations inside function calls

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #56025 (project make): Making the prefix visible is a good idea. I think that it is more compelling if *every* line is prefixed. It creates a good contrast between recipe lines and multi-line variable definitions. Having to leave off a prefix or two is not to bad. I d