PDF viewer you are using?
>
> Could you try a different viewer?
The version of LilyPond used is also a relevant information.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
taves.
Many thanks for your consideration.
If you have questions, do not hesitate to ask.
Please do not forget to cc: Loïc and Jean-François as they asked for
this feature on the French users mailing list, so they could also say
how they would see this new feature work.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
the bug squad members add an issue to keep track until it is
documented?
Thank you in advance.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
w if "repeatCountVisibility" property should be divided
into "percentRepeatCountVisibility" and "unfoldRepeatCountVisibility"
or if they could both share "repeatCountVisibility".
Example of how it would work
\relative c'' {
\set countUnfoldRe
t;)
also?
Currently the doc says
Markup texts may be used for finger changes.
c4-1 d-2 f-4 c^\markup { \finger "2 - 3" }
but of course by doing so they are engraved as TextScript,
not Fingering.
Could you add a feature request for this?
Thank you in advance.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
e documentation I was seeking.
I searched with the terms "Measure_counter_engraver" or "counter",
but I should have tried "\startMeasureCount" or simply "count".
You found it, this is OK then.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
_
On 17 December 2012 12:18, Colin Hall wrote:
>
> Thanks for the very clear and complete feature request, Xavier.
>
> I've created a new tracker for this.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3038
Thank you, I starred it.
Cheers,
Xav
ys handle this, I just would like to make sure
they do not become lost/forgotten.
Thank you!
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
take more horizontal space
than with 2.15.7, but still less than a whole note!
Could you make full measure rests take as much horizontal space as
the equivalent note for every measure/FMR duration?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
whole-measure-rest-horizontal-space.ly
Desc
ur should be changed accordingly.
But only the figures. Accidentals, +, etc. should not be taken into
account in the "centering", contrary to Bertrand's first "workaround".
If someone possessing a reference book could confirm this, th
\clef "treble" \key bes \major \time 6/8
> \autoBeamOff b8 a es!'~ es16[ c] d[ g] e8~|
> }
Hi,
The octave (' or , etc.) is part of the pitch.
Replace es!'~ by es'!~ .
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
ily code
Cheers,
Xavier
PS: I do not think a limitation in a LSR snippet that is AFAIK not part
of LilyPond official documentation could qualify as a bug.
But adding "multi-mark-engraver" features in LilyPond by default could
(should?) be considered as a nice feature request.
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
mitted as issue 3172 :
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3172
Perfect, thanks !
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ml
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
do not see this request tracked yet. Bug squad, could you add it?
Maybe Kieren or Mike could give a proper description.
Link to the original thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-02/msg00064.html
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
d be OK I guess.
But as far as I'm concerned I will certainly use a postfix syntax
that does not need \set or \override to define the text before the note
(like in the code of snippets "Dynamics text spanner postfix" and
"Dynamics custom text spanner postfix" for DynamicTextS
d8 d in Staff one, too.
> Using a shorter RehearsalMark, too.
>
> Nevertheless, the BreathingSign should be placed correct, in all cases.
Actually the placement of the RehearsalMark occurring at the same time
is also wrong. And both the BreathingSign and this RehearsalMark are
wro
grobs to handle these two
with different properties settings ?
Thank you for your attention.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ary 2013 01:37, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> BTW, you could print the MultiMeasureRestNumber on a "single Whole
> Measure Rest", too:
>
> { \set restNumberThreshold = #0 R1 }
Yes I knew that (and already used it).
One point in favor of the fact that "single Whole Measu
trument parts
with lots of MMR and tempo indications still needs careful thinking).
Since it seems "single Whole Measure Rest" and "compressed MMR"
are usually treated similarly, sorry for the noise.
Thank you for your consideration.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
_
/list?can=2&q=partcombine
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #1
r4 |
}
}
\new Voice {
\voiceTwo
\relative c' {
\repeat unfold 4 c4 |
}
}
>>
}
End of lily code
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
ssue - shall this be added?
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3203
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
in
the scores I engraved, but I would gladly pledge 2 times $5 to increase
your motivation. ;)
Please send me (privately) your bank account or any other information
needed for the money transfer as your convenience.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
__
LilyPond; could this be added to the tracker as feature request?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ilypond.org/learning.fr.html
Si tu as d'autres questions, n'hésite pas à les poser sur la liste
francophone, où la communauté active fera de son mieux pour y répondre.
Cordialement,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
oogle.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3978
Is there something to modify in the make-dynamic-extra function
in order to make it centered on the dynamic again?
So that the "mp dolce" and "più f" indications in my scores are
correctly aligned again with latest lily version.
Thank
s: \voiceOne inserted before or after grace
\relative c'' {
\voiceOne c1 \grace c8 c2 c2 % works (\voiceOne activated)
}
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I totally agree, there is a problem with textual Tempo marks alignment.
I wanted to report this too, then I saw issues 684, 700 and now 712
reporting this, so I didn't. But since there are 3 unfixed issues
reporting the same thing and since the first one is open for 8 months
now, I allowed mys
> I'm not top posting.
%% Docs: A staff is considered empty when it contains only multi-measure
%% rests, skips, spacer rests, or a combination of these elements."
%%
%% But because a \partial rest is not one of these elements it prevents
%% \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t to work
Valentin Villenave a écrit :
> Indeed. Non-capitalized rests make a measure to be regarded as
> non-empty, even when it's a partial measure.
Yes, that's what I have understood.
First I was thinking this was a "simple" bug, then after further
investigations I came to this statement.
> I'm not sure
.
If as a user I'm not happy with something I'll come and complaint
about it...
Sincerely,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
uot;annoying" tag, which seems now to be "Priority-High".
I hope these issues are "eligible" to this higher priority.
Cheers,
Xavier
PS: +1 Me too! ;-D
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
e.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=770
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
notation/vertical-spacing-inside-a-system
So this is not an issue to my opinion.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Si tu as d'autres
questions tu peux les poser en Français sur la liste francophone ou en
anglais sur la liste internationale (cf. le lien donné par Francisco).
Cheers,
Cordialement,
Xavier
PS: Thank you Francisco. ;-D
--
Xavier Scheuer
IS, RIGHT, thin, kern);
m.add_at_edge (X_AXIS, RIGHT, colon, kern);
}
to be inserted after line 182?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
rom using manual beaming [ ] in each involved measure).
Or maybe I'm wrong about this.
Cheers (and thanks),
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
% In the following example the DynamicTextSpanner is not printed.
%
% The worst is that it does not even give a warning!
%
\score {
\relative c' {
\crescTextCresc
c'4\p\< c\! % cresc not printed % no problem without \p
c c
}
}
%% same with Reinhold's new postfix \cresc
\score {
}
more than one measure, no manual breaks but still the problem...
The reason is certainly because the following not is very close to
the previous one, but this is not a good reason for me to not print
the "cresc." at all!
There is even no w
ways-complaining users. :D
Thanks everybody,
Xavier
[*] Please do not feel attacked by the term "annoy", I tried to find
a better translation of the french verb "ennuyer", which has a far less
aggressive meaning, but I didn't.
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
hat is stated in 801
description: "(this doesn't happen with a single note)".
So maybe the issue is the same but the description is somewhat
different.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
talled on your PC and try each one
recursively or there is another easier mean?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
> some additional features (automatic breaking for \change Staff and
> manual directions), but I'd be happy to work on those features later
> to get this fixed sorted sooner.
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
Why did you put the multi-measure rest in \voiceOne and the e'' in
\voiceTwo and not the contrary, which would have been far more logical?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I have understood the code-related reason why it is not
displayed now, so I don't know if it is easily feasable to make
LilyPond actually print it. So if it's not possible right now, of
course the warning is a good idea (hence my previous sentence "Th
tures later
> to get this fixed sorted sooner.
Hi Neil!
Shouldn't we open an issue about this on the tracker, at least to
keep track on this discussion and your very interesting proposal?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond maili
Hi dear Bug Squad members!
Could you please add this to the tracker as a "new feature request"
(enhancement I think), at least to keep track of this?
Thank you,
Xavier
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Xavier Scheuer
Date: 11 May 2010 21:07
Subje
efinition.
\version "2.13.21"
\header {
composer = \markup \center-column {
\line { composer line 1 }
\line { composer line 2 }
% "composer line 2" should be closer to "composer line 1"
% than to "arranger"
}
arranger = "arran
n to request
"*without dashed line*" cresc by default for \cresc ... ;D
> So, I would print the "cresc" (even though it goes beyond the second
> note), but print out a warning, too.
Yes (but since it prints the "cresc." I'm not sure the warning is
really necessary). OK, in strict way, yes it is.
Thanks everybody for your attention.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
html
and this discussion:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-02/msg00801.html
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ime, and since the messages of this thread
seem to have been cross-posted differently on all the mailing lists
I'm completely lost!
Thanks a lot,
Xavier
PS: Cc to bug- to add this to the tracker if nobody has the time to do
this now...
--
Xavier Scheuer
_
than digging out and searching all around
on ML archives... :p :D
Thanks,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ering markups/ (useful to, for example, finger
changes), see #2.
What do you think guys of this double proposal?
Frédéric, Carl, Bug Squad members?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
(do ((i 0 (1+ i)))
> ((> i num) (reverse! result))
> (set! result (cons (format "~a" i) result))
>
> \markuplines \column-lines \test #50
> ===
With "ly:minimal-breaking" only?
Cheers,
nA }
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = #"G2 2"
shortInstrumentName = #"G2 2"
} { \patternA }
>>
>>
}
Cheers,
Xavier
[1] Well, actually we have had more than one thread about this, it's a
quite "popular" subject (i.e. people have many questions / problems
to understand it correctly right now).
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
%% RehearsalMark at begin of line should not be printed above the Clef
%%
%% but instead like if there was an "invisible" BarLine just before the
%% note (i.e. after Clef and KeySignature).
\version "2.13.23"
%% BAD (current output)
\score {
\relative c' {
\repeat unfold 8 c1 \break
\m
n the Clef and this "invisible"
BarLine (when there is no KeySignature)?
I mean, in my second \score the "repeat" BarLine could (should) be more
spaced from the Clef.
Or to make this space dependent on the Clef size? Since clef changes
are smaller then that would increase
es on the tracker?
1. for this RehearsalMark placement issue at beginning of line ;
2. to create a separate grobs for clefs and clef changes so they
could have different space-alist defaults.
Thank you,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ntly no issue about this AFAICS.
Please note there might be a BOUNTY offer, but you should have to check
since the original message is 3-year-old:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-03/msg00353.html
Thanks everybody,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
__
s.
For example it is currently impossible to have the CueVoice DOWN
(i.e. the multi-measure rest up) but with the stems UP (actually
"NEUTRAL") instead of DOWN (as a \voiceTwo).
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-09/msg00762.html
Or to include the features of "namedCueDurin
up \left-align \center-column
but that doesn't seem to work here since your title is too long
(same if you use simply your title between quotes)...
But you are right to submit to bug- since there is no issue about this
on the tracker AFAICS.
Cheers,
Xavier
2010/6/11 Xavier Scheuer :
> A workaround that has been given is to use
> \markup \left-align \center-column
> but that doesn't seem to work here since your title is too long
> (same if you use simply your title between quotes)...
Forget the second part, it works!
(I should
Could you have a look and state if it is actually the same issue?
I have seen with interest http://codereview.appspot.com/1667041/show
Thanks a lot for your work on beaming rules!
Cheers,
Xavier
PS: Cc to bug- (while asking Carl for relation with #1083).
--
Xavier Scheuer
__
deBeamSettings just a couple of
weeks ago, I got used to it and was very proud of that!) ;DD
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
*bump*
Dear Bug Squad,
Could you add this "header: baseline-related" issue to the tracker?
Many thanks in advance,
Xavier
2010/5/28 Xavier Scheuer :
> Hi!
>
> I'm experiencing a very annoying (IMO) output with multiline
> \header fields.
>
> I don
00324.html
Try 2.13.24-2 instead, should be OK.
http://lilypond.org/~graham/
lilypond-2.13.24-2.mingw.exe
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
taves is used in the following snippet.
Maybe this change has already been done in master right now, but if it
isn't could somebody modify the doc consequently?
My apologies if I said something wrong.
Many thanks in advance,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
__
didn't know it.
(and he was faster actually!)
Anyway, I'm glad to see people saying the same thing as what I thought.
That proves I might be not totally wrong! ;D
Thanks,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypon
atulations... and thanks!
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
#(ly:make-moment 1 4) instead.
Just apply it to the Staff context, not to a Voice different from "1"
and "2" used in << { ... } \\ { ... } >> structure.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
d-user
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
be renamed into TempoMark, since it
should be now far more often used for textual tempo indications
than for metronome. But maybe I should wait for the GLISS to
suggest that?
PPS : It would also be cool if we could \override separately the
"textual tempo" and the m
the same time,
thanks to a built-in PDF viewer (and other "making things easier"
features).
As you seem to speak German, you may be interested by the "Deutsches
Lilypond Forum", where you can ask your questions in German (and obtain
answers in German as well).
http://www.
A recent message on lilypond-user made me remember this request I made.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-08/msg00220.html
On 11 June 2010 17:25, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>> Could you implement the po
new issue for
this?)
This is AFAIK a quite common practice and should be do-able (at least
a possible "option") without needing some "tricky workaround", IMO.
Many thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\new Staff = "Staff_pfUpper" << \global \upper \dynamics \pedal >>
\new Staff = "Staff_pfLower" << \global \lower \dynamics \pedal >>
>>
\midi { }
}
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\change Staff = "down"
g8 fis g
\change Staff = "up"
8
\change Staff = "down"
e8 dis e
\change Staff = "up"
}
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "up" {
\music
}
\new Staff = "do
Great news!
Fast fix, thanks!
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
also use 2.13.30). But I compiled this again and
I get no errors.
I must have taken the wrong buffer, sorry.
I'll look further into this and maybe submit a better report.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ord fingerings"
NR 1.7.1 Inside the staff > Fingering instructions
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
\override TimeSignature #'X-offset =
#ly:self-alignment-interface::x-aligned-on-self
(on the same one line) and the code compiles and give the correct
result without errors.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ing to cadenzas
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns.html#aligning-to-cadenzas
?
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
maybe I used bad keywords)...
But this limitation is really annoying and *absolutely not
user-friendly* (not understandable from a user point of view).
Sorry for this nonconstructive post.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bu
works (as well as TimeSignature)"
\repeat unfold 8 c'1 \break
\override Score.MetronomeMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(left-edge)
\tempo "Left-edge does not work"
\repeat unfold 8 c'1 \break
\override Score.MetronomeMark #'break-alig
from source.
A simple shell script is provided to install easily LilyPond on various
OS, including Ubuntu (use Linux x86).
Go there for the latest development version release:
http://lilypond.org/development.html
Download "Linux x86: LilyPond 2.13.36-1
o have just the last page tighter than the rest if the gained
> bottom space is not actually required for anything.
Agree.
And if this is possible, then I'd vote to make this the default
behaviour.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-li
= #UP r8 c'' r c''}
> >>
>
>
Greetings,
Just to mention the related discussion on lilypond-user is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-06/msg00350.html
While adding this issue to the tracker, it could be useful to add a link
to this discussion.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ent discussion on user:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-11/msg00014.html
>
Actually I wanted to link _your_ recent discussion on -user.
But I was a bit in a hurry and I did not check twice the link I put
in my e-mail.
Glad to see it was actually re
or cued voice.
Kieren thought it could be possible last time we spoke about this,
i.e. 10 months ago.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
by users.
And also a point about bounties/sponsors in relation (there are people
on the french mailing list that wants to donate to the project but it
currently lacks a structure to manage these donations).
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
tedVoice = "singleVoice"
Sec -- ond time words.
}
\new Lyrics {
\set associatedVoice = "singleVoice"
The third time words.
}
>>
The end sec -- tion.
}
>>
}
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
is actually
opened with Acrobat Reader?
Close your score PDF from Acrobat Reader and then compile.
IIRC, I had similar error message when I tried to compile a score that
was actually opened as a PDF.
It happened only under Windows and with Acrobat Reader.
But I may be wrong (I have not
s Mats pointed out there is a similar problem in my recent
"NR 2.1.2 Lyrics and repeats, improvement proposals"
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1401
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-11/msg00140.html
As he mentioned also issue
{ a4 a a a }
\new Staff { b4 b b b } % second ossia
>>
}
}
>>
}
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Xavier Scheuer
\version "2.13.39"
\header {
%tagline = " "
}
stemOn = { \revert Staff.Stem #'transparent }
stemOff = { \override Staff.Stem #'transparent = ##t }
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a4")
ragged-b
lem as here (6 days ago):
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-12/msg00070.html
Simply add:
\set Timing.beamExceptions = #'()
The documentation was made clearer a few days ago, thanks to Carl.
(mais je pense que la traduction n'a pas encore été mise à j
ly *after* the NEXT NOTE.
I suppose this is an inherent issue but it would be great if it could be
solved, it is really not logical and highly counter-intuitive...
--
Xavier Scheuer
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
lable is
left-aligned instead of horizontally centered below the first note.
This is due to the slur and is normal behaviour AFAIK.
The slur is creating a melismata and LilyPond tries to horizontally
center the syllable below the whole slurred passage. But it needs to
stay below the first note als
ot; behaviour
for that kind of notation.
I have looked at ly/gregorian.ly and it _does_ contain
\layout {
indent = 0.0
(line 223)
so it is intentional.
If you want default (i.e. modern notation) behaviour simply add
\layout {
indent = 15\mm
}
*after* \include "gregorian
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
