%c'8.
%c'8.
%c'8.
%}
}
%%% END %%%
The bug is present under 2.19.26 and 2.19.27; I haven't tested under early
versions.
Thank you for all of the wonderful work in support of LilyPond's rhythmic
time-keeping,
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
www.trevorbaca.com
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
, the work-around is to to set \fullLengthTuplet = ##f for the duration
of just the problematic tuplet in question. (Maybe the work-around should
be added to the tracker.)
Trevor.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> On 16.09.2015 23:04, Trevor Bača wrote:
>
>
the
musical directive is quite useful: "crescendo dal niente to assume the
end-dynamic subito."
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
www.trevorbaca.com
soundcloud.com/trevorbaca
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
r 6, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Simon Albrecht
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Trevor,
>>
>> that’s a known deficiency:
>>
>> <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/search/?
>> q=flared+%26%26+niente>
>>
>> Best,
>> Simon
>>
>>
> Not
ced" (meaning the
grace music appears in both contexts at the same time offset). This makes
me suspect that time-keeping gets off between the two simultaneous contexts
after the grace is interpreted in one voice (but not in the other).
Hope this report helps; a scan of the 4 or 5 pages in th
>>
>>
### END ###
Note that the problem appears to a fence-posting error: *the bug arises
only when stopping-and-restarting *the topmost staff* (as shown above) or
*the bottommost staff**; stopping-and-restarting any of the inner staves in
the staff group does not trigger the bug.
Than
it was, in fact, only the very visible absence of an
extended slur that made this one possible to find.)
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
trevorb...@gmail.com
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ing and are
equivalent to setting Score.rehearsalMarkAlignSymbol = #'foo.
Fortunately, Score.rehearsalMarkAlignSymbol = #'clef seems to handle
the case for bars, too.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
%% END SNIPPET %
(color.ly shows the corresponding reversal where the "cyan" beam
renders as yellow.)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yellow.png
Description: PNG image
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
#(if
(pair? toplevel-scores)
error: failed files: "0320.ly"
On checking, bug was present at least as early as .29 and the error
disappears completely if you write a Staff in place of the
RhythmicStaff.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
b
ual to
#fraction-tuplet-formatter.
Anyway, that was a lot of writing to say "Lily should use
#fraction-tuplet-formatter when either q is *not* an integer power of
2 or when p < q, for any tuplet p:q." Maybe even more concise to say
"if you've got a tuplet ratio where q is *
ual to
#fraction-tuplet-formatter.
Anyway, that was a lot of writing to say "Lily should use
#fraction-tuplet-formatter when either q is *not* an integer power of
2 or when p < q, for any tuplet p:q." Maybe even more concise to say
"if you've got a tuplet ratio where q is *
On 3/4/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This snippet ...
>
> BEGIN SNIPPET %%%
>
> \version "2.7.35"
>
> \new Staff {
>\once \override NoteHead #'color = #azure
>c'4
> }
>
>
ame holds for salmon, chocolate and the other color constants I've
tried listed under appendix C (with the exception of the 15 "normal
colors", all of which work great.)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-li
on uniform-stretching in the SpacingSpanner:
\new Score \with {
\override SpacingSpanner #'uniform-stretching = ##t
}
<<
\staffPianoI
\staffPianoII
>>
\midi {
\tempo 2 = 90
}
\layout {
}
\paper {
}
Turn this property (and most other properties of the abstract
SpacingSpanner) on at the beginning of the score.
Whether tuplets should induce ugly spacing gaps seems to be the matter
of some political debate, so for some time longer you may have to
continue to set uniform-stretching by hand in any of your pieces that
include overlapping tuplets ;-)
HTH.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
32
c'8
c'32 c'32 c'32 c'32
c'8
c'32 c'32 c'32 c'32
c'8]
}
>>
END %%%%%%
Bug is not release critical because proportional notation w
%
Then again, Erik might be perfectly happy with the original example, too.
Either way the pair of bugs probably aren't release critical since
uniform-stretching became available only recently in 2.7. (But
hopefully will get some attention once the 2.9 development cycle
begins.)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
pletFullLength = ##t
\time 1/4
\times 2/3 {
c'8 c'8 c'8
}
\bar "|" \break
c'4
}
%%% END %
Bug is not release critical because tupletFullLength does not appear
in 2.6 and is new to 2.7.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTEC
On 3/15/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> > On 3/15/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Trevor Bača wrote:
> >>
> >>>This is a weird one. If you have the following three conditions .
On 3/15/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/15/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Trevor Bača wrote:
> > > On 3/15/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Trevor Bača wrote:
> >
On 3/16/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> >
> > Ugh. The exact conditions to induce this bug are very difficult.
> >
> > It is possible to come up with an example with somewhat fewer notes
> > and fewer measures, like t
On 3/15/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> > This is a weird one. If you have the following three conditions ...
> >
>
> yes, it's a build issue. Only MacOS has this problem.
Ah, yes. Sorry I didn't mention: I am, in
On 3/16/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Trevor Bača wrote:
> > >
> > > Ugh. The exact conditions to induce this bug are very difficult.
> > >
> > > It is possible to co
nction = #fraction-tuplet-formatter.
Hope this helps; the total set of time-notation features in lily now
is amazing. I can't think of a better vehicle for sketching rhythmic
material for a piece. If you find something you *can't* set, please
say something.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTEC
you
like the diamonds, or because you want the stems to align at the exact
*center* of the notehead (like in Xenakis)?
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
karim.png
Description: PNG image
debug.ly
Description: Binary data
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug
%%
This one's fairly critical for me; is there a way to work around this?
Possibly by setting something special for ghostscript? Or wasn't there
work done on the papesize files recently ... possibly I can edit one
of the .scm files for paper sizing and restore the landscape
orientation?
t;:$PATH
export
GS_LIB="/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/ghostscript/8.50/lib/"
ps2pdf -sPAPERSIZE=11x17 foo.ps
Adjust /whatever/LilyPond.app accordingly for other OSes.
2006/7/15, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> The 'landscape symbol
nostringval--
--nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1122/1686(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:70/200(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
Last OS error: 2
GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
FWIW, this is *not* an urgent bug fo
whole
list sometime later this week because lily was a *huge* factor in my
getting that piece done ...
(Oh, and if anyone's flying to the UK or US in the next couple of
days, for the love of god don't try to carry any shampoo through
security.)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTE
rent allocation mode is local
Last OS error: 2
Current file position is 5895
GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
`gs -dSAFER -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
-r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile="302-1.pdf" -c .setpdfwrite -f
"302-1.eps&q
output format.
On 8/28/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
With 2.9.16 under OS X Intel, the following causes ghostscript to fail.
(Daniel Tonda noticed the problem (or a similar problem) with
lilypond-book under Windows and Mats moved the discussion to
bug-lilypond here on 8
"2.9.26"
\new Staff {
\times 2/3 {
\times 2/3 {
c'8
c'4 % THIS IS OK
}
c'4
c'4
c'4
}
}
%%% END OK %%%
The error seems somewhat important, given that interpretation stops completely.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
the feature reads
\override NoteHead #'duration-log = 1
and should instead read
\override NoteHead #'duration-log = #1
Thanks again.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org
On 11/19/06, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača wrote:
> Minor point that the NEWS source for the feature reads
>
> \override NoteHead #'duration-log = 1
>
> and should instead read
>
> \override NoteHead #'duration-log = #1
Hi Trevo
27;direction = #up
depending on preference. When you want Lily to resume dynamically
positioning the tuplet bracket direction, just write
\revert TupletBracket #'direction
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
tationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 64)
} {
\new Staff {
c'4
\once \override Rest #'transparent = ##t
r4 % propotional spacing ok here with notes and rests -- WORKAROUND
c'4
c'4
}
}
%%% END %%%
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
= ##t
\override SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing = ##t
proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 16)
} {
\new Staff \with {
\remove Separating_line_group_engraver
} {
\time 4/4 s4 s4 s4 s4 % BUG - SKIP AT BEGINNING OF MEASURE
}
}
%%% END %%%
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/4/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> \new Score \with {
> \override SpacingSpanner #'uniform-stretching = ##t
> \override SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing = ##t
> proportionalNotationDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1
asure skips and
proportional notation. Han-Wen has already fixed in git.
Sorry for the two spurious reports.
On 12/6/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks,
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=169
- Graham
Trevor Bača wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Proportiona
7;32 c'32 c'32 ]}
c'4
c'4
c'4
}
%%% END %%%
Severe (and no workaround seems to exist).
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 12/16/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Setting SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing = ##t together with
\afterGrace causes a bus error.
%%% BEGIN %%%
\version "2.11.2"
\new Staff {
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacin
On 12/17/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Setting SpacingSpanner #'strict-note-spacing = ##t together with
> \afterGrace causes a bus error.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=176
(Tried responding directl
the Google issue-tracking pages ... but then
not everyone has a gmail account or Google log-in.]
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 12/20/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača wrote:
> Where do the project team (Graham and Han-Wen, primarily) prefer to
> receive ongoing communication about existing bugs that have made it
> into the Google issue-tracking pages?
>
> A. on the issu
).
Is there some rule about non-project members not being able to attach files?
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
;'64 \flageolet
d''''64 \flageolet
e''''64 \flageolet
fs''''64 \flageolet
e''''64 \flageolet
d''''64 \flageolet
e''''64 \flageolet
fs'''&
x27;t give any extra shift, whereas I
might guess that there is a slight shift when using your original code.
/Mats
Trevor Bača wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please render the following and tell me whether I'm going
> blind?
>
> The example includes two scores. The scores dif
y running convert-ly on an older file with the older
edge-height syntax.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ee
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-09/msg00088.html.)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-center.png
Description: PNG image
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ll down and click on the "Install" link next to the Windows logo.
The current version is 2.10.16-1.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
ample; needs length to show up.
Bug? Or new behavior? (If the latter, what's the right way to set a page break?)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
of spanners can
now be set completely independently.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
essages either way.
Hi,
Pretty sure this is a recent bug. May also relate to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2007-02/msg00163.html
Moving thread over to bug-.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypo
x27;1 | \break
> \spaceWide c''1 | }
> \new Staff \with { \consists Mark_engraver } { g' | g'\mark "lower
> staff" | g' | g' | }
> >>
> \layout { \context { \Score \remove Mark_engraver } }
> }
>
On 2/13/07, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/12/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pretty sure this is a bug, but thought I'd post to bug- first before
> opening in Google.
>
> Sometimes I build .ly files that are essentially t
nks in advance for any help you might offer!
Please send a short example.
Chances are good you're overriding the wrong grob, or overriding the
right grob in the wrong context.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@g
- file compiles normally, expected output
or
4) upgrade to 2.10.20-1 Problem solved
This was helpful.
I just moved from 2.11.18 to 2.11.20 and got the "No fonts found ..." error.
Doing ...
rm ~/.fontconfig
... fixed the problem, as described in James's mail.
"pause" at all when speaking of
music, which seems odd. But i can't think of a single example. Any
other Americans feel differently?
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
the glossary. :)
The other American English word I'm familiar with for fermata is "hold."
?
I'm confused. "Hold" -- like "pause" -- certainly isn't used as a
musical term in the US. Or am I missing something? Is "hold" a
Britishism for
into that particular error.
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
END %%%
... works while this one ...
%%% BEGIN %%%
\version "2.11.22"
\new Staff {
\override BarLine #'transparent = ##t
c'1 c'1 c'1 c'1
}
%%% END %%%
... doesn't.
Maybe that's why?
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
On 5/16/07, karim haddad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
karim haddad wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From: *"Trevor Bača" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> *Date: *May 16, 2007 5:59:42 PM CEDT
>> *To
_
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
bject should be dead: static
scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
I can send over the complete inputfile if anyone cares; but, again,
the output is just fine.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond maili
tracker, but they get the lowest priority.
Cheers,
- Graham
Trevor Bača wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we need to worry about this programming error? I was interpreting a
> gigantic inputfile (65,000 lines) but the output turned out just fine.
>
> Here's the complete output of the run
what(): std::bad_alloc
/Users/trevorbaca/Documents/lascaux/scr/lily: line 4: 481 Abort trap
%%%
The error isn't critical to me because the file is a sketch only, not
a production score. But if anyone wants to take a look at the
inputfile, let me know and I'll mail separately.
ghtBeamCount = #4
c'64
c'16 ]
}
%%% EX 1 %%%
Not sure which version this showed up in but I think it's been around for a
while.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hi,
The 2.11 user manual, reference manual and snippets have all been
giving 404s for the last couple of hours.
I assumed this was due to a doc (re)building process going on
somewhere. But if not, could someone put the docs back online?
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED
; ragged-right = ##t
> > }
> >
> > % The bracket for the middle tuplet won't be printed
> >
> > \relative c' {
> > \times 2/3 {r8 c4} \times 2/3 {r8 c'4} \times 2/3 {r8 c c}
> > }
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Tuukka Verho
> >
>
s2.
}
>>
%%% END EX 1 %%%
GNU LilyPond 2.11.28
Processing `0165.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...ERROR: In procedure
ly:hara-kiri-group-spanner::pure-height:
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 2: 0
rm: 0165.ps: No such file or directory
Comment
On 8/18/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Entered as Google #141, the following snippet explodes because of the
> hairpin at line 7:
>
>
> %%% EX 1 %%%
>
> \version "2.11.28"
>
> \new PianoStaff <<
>\n
Staff
}
\context { \RhythmicStaff
\type Engraver_group
\name Bow
\alias Staff
}
\context { \GrandStaff
\name Violin
\alias GrandStaff
\accepts ViolinPitches
\accepts Bow
}
\context { \Score
\accepts Violin
}
}
%%% END %%%
N
On 8/21/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.11.30 generates the following fatal error (entered as Google #419):
>
> GNU LilyPond 2.11.30
> Processing `0174.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Finding the
aff = LH {
s4
}
>>
%%% END %%%
Really nasty is some heavily \markup-ed piano music.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
which Han-Wen has already fixed.)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On 8/31/07, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/8/31, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Crossposted as Google #433.
>
> Hi Trevor,
> I don't know if you've suscribed to the bug-lilypond list (if you have
> no
On 8/31/07, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2007 23:17, Trevor Bača wrote:
> > Should I send the inputfile to either Joe or Han-Wen for testing against
> > .31?
>
> I'd be happy to take a look at it.
Thank you *so* much, Jo
On 8/31/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/8/31, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Crossposted as Google #433.
> >
> > Running 2.11.30 on a relatively large file (110 measures of six staves
> > with 4559 line
taff = rh \relative { c8-_( \lh \stemDown e[ c g]) }
> \new Staff = lh { \clef bass s4. }
> >>
> }
Hi Neil,
I can't be certain, but I'd bet that this is related to Google #430:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=430
If it's the same bug, then
On 9/2/07, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Joe Neeman escreveu:
> >> On Saturday 01 September 2007 09:00, Trevor Bača wrote:
> >>> On 8/31/07, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
teven,
Line spanners (including glissandi) changed in 2.11 and now afford
independent left- and right-tweaking.
See 8.1.2 "Text and line spanners" in the 2.11 manual for details.
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond m
On Feb 4, 2008 7:10 PM, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> Could you please consider this one for the tracker? It's quite specific
> thing ever, but highly reproducible (and quite irritating).
>
>
> ===
>
>
> The score-final mark bad
the problem.
(Actually, mark direction can be either up or down, but appears more clearly
with the mark set down.)
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
rride TextSpanner #'bound-details #'left #'text =
\markup { \italic "coperta" }
c'4 \startTextSpan c'4 c'4 c'4 \break
c'4 c'4 c'4 c'4 \stopTextSpan
}
%%% END %%%
Mental note for anyone doing stuff with text spanners:
7;left #'text = "start"
c'4 \startTextSpan c'4 c'4 c'4 \break
c'4 c'4 c'4 c'4 \stopTextSpan
}
Note that this alist syntax is not available in NR. This syntax is available
in the IR ... but with no reference to left-broken and rig
2008/2/8 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 07/02/2008, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Valentin,
> >
> > Another one for the tracker. I suspect this one relates very closely to
> the
> > previous bug I mailed in less than an hour
On Feb 11, 2008 11:55 AM, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> No idea what might be causing that ... but it strikes me as bizarrely
> similar to an alignment problem I've been having with the left text of
> trill spanners. I'll post back if
x27;t seem to be an easy workaround -- we'd have to know
something like half the width of the associated bound object (in staff
spaces) in order to be able to correct the problem with something like
'extra-offset;
c. one of the biggest chunks of new functionality in 2.11 is the new
spann
2008/2/14 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/2/13, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Could you please consider this one for the tracker?
>
> Thanks Trevor (actually your mail came through).
>
> Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/
ilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond-book",
line 1657, in do_process_cmd
output_files = set(os.listdir(options.lily_output_dir))
NameError: global name 'set' is not defined
Adding ...
import md5
import os
import re
import stat
import sys
import
gt;
> That will use the python in your path.
Ah right. Of course!
Thanks, Graham.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
n ?
> Or am i missing something here ?
Hi Karim,
What are the chances that your \once \override happens *after* the beam has
already begun??
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Right. I was reading up through unanswered mail and unfortunately sent the
response before seeing the rest of the splintered thread!
Thanks!
2008/6/2 Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/2 Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > What are the chances that your
a bug. Breaks on my end (2.11.57), too.
I fear, however, that this particular bug has probably been around since
inception. And it doesn't completely surprise me, either: up through
February (when I was finishing up the trio) 'weird things' would happen if I
had graces come at the beginning of a line; proportional notation was, of
course, turned on. I actually had to go back and strip out beginning-of-line
graces in the piece. The grace stripping wasn't too much of a loss for me
... but I'd be willing to be that you're going to be using graces next to
line breaks all over, aren't you?
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
break
> \grace{ g'64 }
> c'4
> \break
> c'4
> \break
> c'4
> \break
> }
> }
> %%% END %%%
>
Yes, so this is still a bug: we need to be able to have "b
% END %%%
Oh, and happy New Year! Looking forward to trying 2.12 soon ...
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
trevorb...@gmail.com
<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
> 2009/1/7 Trevor Bača :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone check and see if this one is already in the tracker?
>
> It certainly is; have a look at issue #546.
>
> Joe posted a patch to fix
error message
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1781
FWIW, running 2.5.15 *from the commandline* under Lion works great for me.
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
trevorb...@gmail.com
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Floris van Manen wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2011, at 17:12, Trevor Bača wrote:
>
> >
> > FWIW, running 2.5.15 *from the commandline* under Lion works great for
> me.
> >
>
> not here...
>
>
>
> $ Downloads/LilyPond.app/
crescendi) that occur at or begin or end
> at one and the same note will be vertically aligned.
Agreed. Probably also best to note that the vertical alignment of
hairpins will be starting at left note-edge and ending at right
note-edge (as not everyone may have been around for the threa
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
