On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:03:38PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> Le 05/01/2011 03:59, Graham Percival disait :
> >I believe the problem is an @unnumberedsubsec without having a @node
> >in front of it; this is forbidden by our doc policy. This does not
> >appear in the english version of
Le 05/01/2011 03:59, Graham Percival disait :
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude
wrote:
I fully translated running.itely (part of usage), which contains
unnumbered sectioning. I then translated input.itely (part of
notation), where there is a link to a node which i
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> I fully translated running.itely (part of usage), which contains
> unnumbered sectioning.
> I then translated input.itely (part of notation), where there is a link
> to a node which is an unmberedsubsec in running (Invoking
Hi John, and a bonne et heureuse année, avec un PHD !
Ther seem to be a problem with cross referencing to another splitted
manual, at least towards "usage".
I fully translated running.itely (part of usage), which contains
unnumbered sectioning.
I then translated input.itely (part of notation), w
