On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > I fully translated running.itely (part of usage), which contains > unnumbered sectioning. > I then translated input.itely (part of notation), where there is a link > to a node which is an unmberedsubsec in running (Invoking lilypond).
Unnumbered sectioning is nothing new; we use it all the time in Notation. I believe the problem is an @unnumberedsubsec without having a @node in front of it; this is forbidden by our doc policy. This does not appear in the english version of running.itely, but I *do* see one of these in the french version of running.itely. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
