On 16 January 2012 21:04, -Eluze wrote:
>
>
> Ralph Palmer-3 wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:29 AM, -Eluze wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is -dverbose a legitimate option? I would have thought the form would be
>> -d
>> --verbose. When I try that (lilypond -d --verbose FILENAME), I get
>> "warning: no s
uld be clarified!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/verbose-does-not-work-when-invoked-as--d-option-tp33143109p33150387.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing li
uivalent to loglevel=ERROR)
> -v, --versionshow version number and exit
> -V, --verbosebe verbose (equivalent to loglevel=DEBUG)
> -w, --warranty show warranty and copyright
>
> of course one can use lilypond -V or lilypon
show warranty and copyright
of course one can use lilypond -V or lilypond --verbose
should this option be removed from the -d options and the corresponding -d
help ?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/verbose-does-not-work-when-invoked-as--d-option