RE: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-29 Thread James Lowe
Subject: Re: tiny correction to NR On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:33:12 +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > added as 1282: > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1282 thanks! I've added a comment in the issue with an update as per: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilyp

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-29 Thread Vicente Solsona
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:33:12 +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: added as 1282: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1282 thanks! I've added a comment in the issue with an update as per: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-09/msg00309.html I hope I have proceeded c

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-29 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
On Mon 20 Sep 2010, 19:12 Vicente Solsona wrote: > hello, > > the example in the third entry of NR "4.6.2 Changing spacing" is inaccurate > afaik: Since it's still inaccurate, added as 1282: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1282 Thank you! > -8<- >

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-21 Thread Vicente Solsona
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:49:45 +0200, Graham Percival wrote: IIRC there's properties like V-offset and H-offset, which *are* taken into account by the spacing engine. Vicente: could you look into this? I can't find V-offset nor H-offset, you probably mean Y-offset and X-offset. indeed it s

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-21 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:03:26PM -0400, James Lowe wrote: > Vicente, > > On 20/09/2010 19:30, Vicente Solsona wrote: > > if you are getting an extra page just because the \f in the example (and > > this happens often), using extra-offset won't decrease the vertical spacing > > and you will keep

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-20 Thread Vicente Solsona
I will make an appropriate patch for the NR Thank you for letting us know and your patience (with me). my pleasure to add my half cent. thank *you* :) ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilyp

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-20 Thread James Lowe
Vicente, On 20/09/2010 19:30, Vicente Solsona wrote: >>> #'extra-offset does *not* affect vertical nor horizontal spacing, so it >>> does not save vertical space. we have to disable the collision first so >>> the dynamics don't take vertical space and then move it for aesthetical >>> purposes, so

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-20 Thread Vicente Solsona
#'extra-offset does *not* affect vertical nor horizontal spacing, so it does not save vertical space. we have to disable the collision first so the dynamics don't take vertical space and then move it for aesthetical purposes, so the valid example should be (after a native english revision): I

Re: tiny correction to NR

2010-09-20 Thread James
hello, On 20/09/2010 18:12, Vicente Solsona wrote: hello, the example in the third entry of NR "4.6.2 Changing spacing" is inaccurate afaik: -8<- e4 c g\f c \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -2.2 . 2.0) e4 c g\f c -8<- #'extra

tiny correction to NR

2010-09-20 Thread Vicente Solsona
hello, the example in the third entry of NR "4.6.2 Changing spacing" is inaccurate afaik: -8<- e4 c g\f c \override DynamicText #'extra-offset = #'( -2.2 . 2.0) e4 c g\f c -8<- #'extra-offset does *not* affect vertical nor horizontal spa