Patrick McCarty wrote:
> So, in other words, this is an open issue.
Is it in the tracker? I couldn't find it. I
searched for DynamicTextSpanner.
If not, can it be added to the tracker and to
the "Known issues" section of NR 1.3.1 Dynamics?
Usually before I post to -devel or bug- (with
a problem
2008/11/7 Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Neil submitted a patch recently to fix this exact issue, but it was
> then reverted because it broke a regression test.
Yes, unfortunately it broke the case when a spanner directly follows a
dynamic script; this is why there's an annoying shift in
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2.) The default settings for bound-details must be wrong.
>Can someone double-check them? Shouldn't the X-value
>for (left) stencil-offset be set to the same value as
>(left) padding? Every "cresc." I
>I like the 0.75 value of right padding; I
>propose 0.75 for left padding and (0.75 . -0.5) for
>left stencil-offset.
Sorry. I meant (-0.75 . -0.5) for left stencil-offset.
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu
So, if I want 2 units of padding between the "cresc."
and the spanner-line, first I need to set:
\override DynamicTextSpanner
#'bound-details #'left #'padding = #2
which moves both text and spanner-line 2 units to the
right. Then I need to move just the text back 2 units
to the left by setti
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> As usual, I cannot figure out if this is actually a bug, but here goes...
>
> Increasing the left-padding for a DynamicTextSpanner moves the DynamicText to
> the right. This seems wrong. Shouldn't the text st
Hi everyone.
As usual, I cannot figure out if this is actually a bug, but here goes...
Increasing the left-padding for a DynamicTextSpanner moves the DynamicText to
the right. This seems wrong. Shouldn't the text stay put and the spanner be
shortened? See the attached file/image.
Increasing the
