Hi Mark, On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2.) The default settings for bound-details must be wrong. > Can someone double-check them? Shouldn't the X-value > for (left) stencil-offset be set to the same value as > (left) padding? Every "cresc." I see in LilyPond is > strangely shifted 0.5 units to the right. This can't > be correct. I like the 0.75 value of right padding; I > propose 0.75 for left padding and (0.75 . -0.5) for > left stencil-offset. > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond-internals/DynamicTextSpanner > > bound-details (list): > > '((right (attach-dir . -1) (Y . 0) (padding . 0.75)) > (right-broken (attach-dir . 1) (padding . 0.0)) > (left (attach-dir . -1) (Y . 0) (stencil-offset 0 . -0.5) (padding . 0.5)) > (left-broken (attach-dir . 1)))
Neil submitted a patch recently to fix this exact issue, but it was then reverted because it broke a regression test. Here are a couple of posts from the mailing lists that provide a little more insight: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2008-07/msg00084.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-09/msg00198.html So, in other words, this is an open issue. -Patrick _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
