Re: getting score information

2019-10-08 Thread Knute Snortum
> > > > When doing \musicxml \simplescore the scheme function gets an object of the > type ly:score. > > > > By digging in code I found out that from this score music can be extracted > using ly:score-music > > Also header can be extracted using ly:score-header an

getting score information

2019-10-07 Thread jaap de wolff
-music Also header can be extracted using ly:score-header and output-defs using ly:score-output-defs The extracted music can be used without a problem. However I can not figure out how to use the extracted header and output-defs. I want to be able to extract information like composer and

Re: Retrieving information about breaks

2015-01-23 Thread David Nalesnik
Urs, On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > Hi David, > > thanks, that works great. > It did *not* write to a file, but that's not the issue here. > The main point is that it listens to implicit break events. > The only time it doesn't write to a file for me is when I don't save

Re: Retrieving information about breaks

2015-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
aks, page breaks and page turns have been placed in LilyPond? I'm sure this information has to be present at one point, but someone (I think it may have been David Nalesnik) expressed the opinion that engravers could only access explicit \break-s. I would like to write o

Re: Retrieving information about breaks (was: Partial compilation (again))

2015-01-23 Thread David Nalesnik
e at which positions (in terms of barnumber and > measure-position) the final line breaks, page breaks and page turns have > been placed in LilyPond? > I'm sure this information has to be present at one point, but someone (I > think it may have been David Nalesnik) expressed the opini

Retrieving information about breaks (was: Partial compilation (again))

2015-01-23 Thread Urs Liska
reaks, page breaks and page turns have been placed in LilyPond? I'm sure this information has to be present at one point, but someone (I think it may have been David Nalesnik) expressed the opinion that engravers could only access explicit \break-s. I would like to write out a log file cont

Re: [LSR v-2.18] "File Information", strange warnings.

2014-02-16 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
2014-02-16 12:51 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup : > Conversion works after normalizing the awful Scheme formatting. Try > convert-ly on the following: > Thanks David ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bu

Re: [LSR v-2.18] "File Information", strange warnings.

2014-02-16 Thread David Kastrup
version "2.14.0" %{ Display ly file information on the score, including file name, file size, LilyPond version, date processed, time processed, time last modified, and the LilyPond command line. %} #(define comml(object->string (command-line))) #(define loc (+ (string-rindex c

[LSR v-2.18] "File Information", strange warnings.

2014-02-16 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Squad, The following snippet : http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=197 partially compile with warnings : Processing... Parsing... .../file-information.ly:14:2: error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning here # ( define siz ( object->string ( stat:size ( stat filen .../fil

Re: Optical size information in Emmentaler-nn OpenType fonts

2012-09-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> [...] it seems that Pango doesn't support this currently out of the >> box which means that lilypond doesn't directly benefit. > > Well, I'm not sure about that anymore. > > The feature makes sense if you have several variants of the same > family, and these variants are designed to be used at

Re: Optical size information in Emmentaler-nn OpenType fonts

2012-09-12 Thread Urs Liska
the inner workings of OpenType (or any) font technologies. Aah. Look up the `size' feature on this page: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_pt.htm I wasn't aware that such a feature exists. The necessary information could be rather easily added using FontForge, I

Re: Optical size information in Emmentaler-nn OpenType fonts

2012-09-07 Thread Werner LEMBERG
font technologies. Aah. Look up the `size' feature on this page: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_pt.htm I wasn't aware that such a feature exists. The necessary information could be rather easily added using FontForge, I think. Your request definitely deserves a

Re: Optical size information in Emmentaler-nn OpenType fonts

2012-09-07 Thread Marek Klein
Hello, 2012/9/6 Urs Liska > Is there any information about optical sizes in the OpenType fonts used by > LilyPond? > And if not, would it be complicated to add this? > You should ask on devel list first... Marek bug squad member ___

Re: -dno-point-and-click undocumented (was: PDF information issues)

2012-09-07 Thread Marek Klein
Hello, 2012/9/6 Werner LEMBERG > > - -dno-point-and-click was exactly what I was looking for; > > lilypond --help had not revealed that wisdom. > > Indeed, it is missing for `lilypond -dhelp'. Looks like a bug... > Tthis was added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2814by Co

Optical size information in Emmentaler-nn OpenType fonts

2012-09-06 Thread Urs Liska
Is there any information about optical sizes in the OpenType fonts used by LilyPond? And if not, would it be complicated to add this? To explain: I have an Adobe OpenType font family containing its font faces in four sets: text, caption, subhead and display, each set designed for use at

Re: -dno-point-and-click undocumented (was: PDF information issues)

2012-09-06 Thread eluze
69038.n5.nabble.com/dno-point-and-click-undocumented-was-PDF-information-issues-tp132343p132358.html Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

-dno-point-and-click undocumented (was: PDF information issues)

2012-09-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> - -dno-point-and-click was exactly what I was looking for; > lilypond --help had not revealed that wisdom. Indeed, it is missing for `lilypond -dhelp'. Looks like a bug... Werner ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.

Re: Issue 2385 in lilypond: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX

2012-03-20 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 2385 by harmathdenes: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2385 Done in Hungarian (commit 3f1432a63bf849f003b67e8b481f4e38405f6253). ___ bug

Re: Issue 2385 in lilypond: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX

2012-03-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Started Comment #2 on issue 2385 by paconet@gmail.com: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2385 Done in Japanese. ___ bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 2385 in lilypond: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX

2012-03-10 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: paconet@gmail.com Comment #1 on issue 2385 by paconet@gmail.com: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2385 (No comment was entered for this change

Issue 2385 in lilypond: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX

2012-03-10 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Documentation New issue 2385 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Translated donwnload page does not show correct information for MacOSX http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2385 On 10 March 2012 10:38, Hans Aikema wrote: On 9-3-2012 18:39, Graham

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-03-09 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #18 on issue 2320 by philehol...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 Verified that these changes are in current git master

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-03-08 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #17 on issue 2320 by philehol...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 Reverted to fixed, since this needs reverifying by checking the source as pulled from git

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-03-05 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #16 on issue 2320 by colingh...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 Verified patch included in 2.15.32 by checking the commitish with git log origin. Also

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-03-02 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Patch-push Fixed_2_15_32 Comment #15 on issue 2320 by janek.li...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 pushed as 90ee61d5b681295b8b401128ca9bc48554eee66a

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-03-01 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push Comment #14 on issue 2320 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 Counted down to 20120301, please push

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-26 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-review Comment #12 on issue 2320 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c12 Patchy the autobot says: LGTM. ___ bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-26 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #11 on issue 2320 by janek.li...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c11 CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project Phil Holmes wrote a nice web app

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-25 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-review Comment #10 on issue 2320 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c10 Patchy the autobot says: LGTM. ___ bug

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-25 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 2320 by janek.li...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c9 CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project Phil Holmes wrote a nice web app that allows people to review regtests

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-25 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #7 on issue 2320 by janek.li...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c7 CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project Phil Holmes wrote a nice web app that

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 2320 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 Relevant part of the logfile: Please check the logfile contributor.makeinfotxt.log for errors make[1]: *** [out/contributor.txt] Error

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-23 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-needs_work Comment #5 on issue 2320 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c5 Patchy the autobot says: warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors. Problem with issue 2320

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-22 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #4 on issue 2320 by janek.li...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c4 CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project Phil Holmes wrote a nice web app that

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-15 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 2320 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 It also uses undefined macros @docLinkSplit and @docLinkBig (those are defined in web.texi but not in contributor.texi

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-15 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work Comment #2 on issue 2320 by d...@gnu.org: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 This patch introduces a new node without entering it in the menu structure

Re: Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-14 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 2320 by janek.li...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320#c1 CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project Phil Holmes wrote a nice web app that allows people to review regtests

Issue 2320 in lilypond: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project

2012-02-14 Thread lilypond
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch-new New issue 2320 by janek.li...@gmail.com: Patch: CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2320 CG: add information about Regtest Checking Project Phil Holmes wrote a nice

Issue 2241 in lilypond: Book only puts copyright information on the first page

2012-01-22 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Other New issue 2241 by philehol...@gmail.com: Book only puts copyright information on the first page http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2241 Reported by Christopher Maden: When using multiple bookparts within a book, it would be

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-07-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -fixed_2-14_0 fixed_2_14_0 Comment #11 on issue 1502 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-07-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: fixed_2-14_0 Comment #10 on issue 1502 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-06-23 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #9 on issue 1502 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 Thanks for this, Keith. Took me a while to research the fact that

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-06-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 1502 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 Sounds like cut-and-paste did not result in a proper UTF8-encoded .ly file for Phil. I get a good PDF file

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-06-21 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters Comment #7 on issue 1502 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Document information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 If I

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-05-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 1502 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 Unverified in 2.13.61 ___ bug

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-05-03 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #5 on issue 1502 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 Verified 2.15.0 ___ bug

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-04-19 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Patch-review fixed_2_15_0 Comment #4 on issue 1502 by percival.music.ca: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 (No comment was entered for this

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-04-16 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Started Comment #3 on issue 1502 by reinhold...@gmail.com: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 Pushed to master with commit dffe04e8e1a7c0b94fdfc30e44fe141dfbe7cbec

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-04-14 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review Comment #2 on issue 1502 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 Compiles and clean regtest on 2.13.60

Re: Issue 1502 in lilypond: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-04-14 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #1 on issue 1502 by reinhold...@gmail.com: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 Patch is up for review: http://codereview.appspot.com/4398046

Issue 1502 in lilypond: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters

2011-02-07 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High New issue 1502 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOcument information in PDF headers requires escapes for accented characters http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1502 An example: \version "2.13.48" \header

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-09-09 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #29 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 No complaints yet, so I'm declaring it "good enough", with the

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_32 Comment #28 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Neil: technically the "one last look" should

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-27 Thread lilypond
Comment #27 on issue 989 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 ? All the reg tests were listed, and as I (and others) docced them the list was reviewed by Phil who removed the

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-26 Thread lilypond
Comment #26 on issue 989 by n.puttock: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 I've added "scheme" and "symbols and glyphs" to that snippet These aren't used in the docs.

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-24 Thread lilypond
Comment #25 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Sorry for the pronoun misuse. Apparently a snippet only makes it into our docs if it's tagged with "docs

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-24 Thread lilypond
Comment #24 on issue 989 by bealingsplayfordnews: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=706 As stated a few times, it's not "them

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-24 Thread lilypond
Comment #23 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 I just did a LSR update, but didn't see them. Were they tagged with "docs"

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-20 Thread lilypond
Comment #22 on issue 989 by PhilEHolmes: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 The one that remained that needs to be done has just been uploaded to the LSR. The other that remained outstanding

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-20 Thread lilypond
Comment #21 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 LSR is now up; have those two snippets been added? I can't recall seeing them in a LSR update. If they&#x

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #20 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 LSR seems to be down; we won't have the latest 2 snippets until it's back up and we can download from th

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #19 on issue 989 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 I think this is now done. of the 6 remaining snippets, 4 were committed yesterday and the last 2 have been put

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

2010-08-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests Comment #18 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 As Han-Wen pointed out

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-08-10 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: --- Comment #17 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 A lot of these things were never added to the 2.12 docs (or 2.10, or 2.8...). But with the old doc system

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-08-10 Thread lilypond
Comment #16 on issue 989 by hanwenn: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 graham, not wanting to rain on anyone's parade, but why are you holding back the release for this? Have these things been removed from the

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only inthe regtests

2010-08-01 Thread Trevor Daniels
I'd also like someone to review the entries (in the wiki) for markup-eyeglasses.ly - this is already documented lyric-hyphen.ly - half the ly file is not shown in the reg tests and I am not sure what to do here. font-postscript.ly - this i believe is already documented I've added comments

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-07-27 Thread lilypond
Comment #15 on issue 989 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Just an update as I have been doing most of the work here. According to: http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests I have left to do

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only intheregtests

2010-06-27 Thread Phil Holmes
"Phil Holmes" wrote in message news:i05ajd$18...@dough.gmane.org... wrote in message news:14-9567054385019064696-7381504033751444317-lilypond=googlecode@googlecode.com... Comment #14 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regt

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only inthe regtests

2010-06-26 Thread Phil Holmes
wrote in message news:14-9567054385019064696-7381504033751444317-lilypond=googlecode@googlecode.com... Comment #14 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 PS the easiest way to figure

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-06-26 Thread lilypond
Comment #14 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 PS the easiest way to figure out what's "blocking work" would just be to go to the top of the list and find the first reg

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-06-26 Thread lilypond
Comment #13 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 The biggest problem right now is the lack of somebody organizing this effort. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-06-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #12 on issue 989 by kie...@alumni.rice.edu: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Can I help with this issue? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-06-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #11 on issue 989 by kie...@alumni.rice.edu: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Can I do this one? ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-05-09 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 postfix \cresc should be documented elsewhere than the regtests. ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-05-08 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Started Comment #9 on issue 989 by pnorcks: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-04-01 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Comment 7: committed. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-03-31 Thread lilypond
Comment #7 on issue 989 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Graham, here is a patch to show the non-integer example for \bendAfter in the NR i haven't touched any snippets though - they

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-03-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 989 by v.villenave: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Thanks for posting this howto, Graham. I've been ill for a few days and it's not getting any better, but I'll go on with the re

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-03-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Unfortunately, most of the regtests that Valentin picked out don't have anything to do with the NR, so it's not your concern.

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-03-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 989 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 I can help with the NR stuff. I have looked at the Wiki but don't really understand what it is that needs documenting. Sorry to be

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-03-06 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 989 by v.villenave: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 I have begun an extensive review of the regtests, my current progression may be seen on http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Regtests We need

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-02-28 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Great! A few more tidbits: - you don't need to write the docs yourself; just keep track of regtest filenames with info we shoul

Re: Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-02-27 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: v.villenave Comment #1 on issue 989 by v.villenave: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 I'm taking ownership of this one. Not that I won't welcome any help in handling it; any (

Re: textedit: wrong information generated in 2.13.12 and 2.12.13

2010-02-26 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Robin Bannister wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> >> I will try to see what's going on. > > See here for an overview > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-02/msg00124.html Thanks, submitted: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1022

Re: textedit: wrong information generated in 2.13.12 and 2.12.13

2010-02-21 Thread Robin Bannister
Patrick McCarty wrote: I will try to see what's going on. See here for an overview http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-02/msg00124.html Cheers, Robin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/

Re: textedit: wrong information generated in 2.13.12 and 2.12.13

2010-02-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
Hi, I'm attaching smaller versions of the screenshots you sent me off list, so that it will be easier for everyone to see what's going on. On 2010-02-20, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Rudi Radler > wrote: > > For explaining screen shots pls. check > > http://www.lilyp

Re: textedit: wrong information generated in 2.13.12 and 2.12.13

2010-02-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Rudi Radler wrote: > For explaining screen shots pls. check > http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=563.0;attach=557 Hi, Please attach the screenshots to this list, since I cannot access those attachments you are linking to. Thanks, Patrick

textedit: wrong information generated in 2.13.12 and 2.12.13

2010-02-20 Thread Rudi Radler
For explaining screen shots pls. check http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=563.0;attach=557 kind regards Radler Hannover, Germany ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilyp

Issue 989 in lilypond: ensure that no information is only in the regtests

2010-01-20 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Critical New issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information is only in the regtests http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989 Some information can only be found in regtests... even worse, it's

Re: \time information is not being output to midi file

2009-02-28 Thread Neil Puttock
h does display >> the meter as 3/4. > > Hm. > > I don't know about midi time sigs, can anyone else verify? This looks > weird indeed. > > % \time information is not rendered in the midi file > > \version "2.12.0" > \score { >  \relative c'&

Re: \time information is not being output to midi file

2009-02-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
#x27;t know about midi time sigs, can anyone else verify? This looks weird indeed. % \time information is not rendered in the midi file \version "2.12.0" \score { \relative c''' { \time 3/4 g } \midi { } } Regards, Valentin __

Re: \time information is not being output to midi file

2009-02-28 Thread Valentin Villenave
2009/1/28 Marten Visser : > Dear developers, Greetings and sorry for the delay, > The \time information is not being output to midi file. > See the example. Hmm... /What/ example? :-) Regards, Valentin ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug

\time information is not being output to midi file

2009-01-28 Thread Marten Visser
Dear developers, The \time information is not being output to midi file. See the example. I use Anvil Studio verison 2008.09.04 to view the contents of the midi file. Best, Marten ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http

Re: Information

2004-05-25 Thread david
This is an autoresponder. I'll never see your message. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

convert-ly loses information in auto-beam settings

2004-03-26 Thread Peter Chubb
In my old score I had: \property ChoirStaff.autoBeamSettings \override #'(end * * * *) = #(make-moment 1 4) convert-ly converts this to #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * * *) 1 4) To get the same semantics that should be #(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * *

Virenchecker Information

2004-03-16 Thread virencheck
Dies ist eine automatisch generierte Meldung - auto-generated email . Die Mail mit folgenden Eigenschaften - original mail header : Subjekt: Re: Document Absender / from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Empfänger / to : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Path : Received:

information

2004-02-19 Thread daniel . veillard
something is going wrong <> ___ Bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Your requested information xzt swlolce

2003-12-13 Thread Ray Bacon
Are interested in Working Full time at home? If so just take one moment to see how you can start today. http://www.ecom-universe.net/splash1/FF.htm - No cold calling - No sales calls - Put your computer to work - No Boring Meetings to Attend. - A Simple Turnkey System. - You Can Earn Money Quick

The MIME information you requested (last changed 3154 Feb 14)

2003-08-21 Thread UW Email Robot
o Pacific Rim Address: munnari.oz.au (128.250.1.21) o Europe Address: nic.nordu.net (192.36.148.17) Look for the file /rfc/rfc1521.txt Another source of informat

The MIME information you requested (last changed 3154 Feb 14)

2003-08-21 Thread UW Email Robot
o Pacific Rim Address: munnari.oz.au (128.250.1.21) o Europe Address: nic.nordu.net (192.36.148.17) Look for the file /rfc/rfc1521.txt Another source of informat

  1   2   >