Updates:
Summary: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the
regtests
Comment #18 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information
about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989
As Han-Wen pointed out, we shouldn't be holding back a release for any
undocumented 2.13-only features. I've therefore made a separate issue 1217
for taking care of that.
This issue is now about features present in 2.12.3 only -- we will not have
a stable release until any relevant information in the 2.12.3 regtests is
in the documentation.
(I know that some people might feel strongly that "undocumented new
features" is a reason to delay a release... frankly, I feel the same way,
and after 2.14.0 is out, I'm going to propose that this become an official
release-blocking condition. However, it doesn't match our traditional
release-blocking condition, and I don't feel justified in changing the
rules at this stage in the release.)
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond