Updates:
Summary: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests

Comment #18 on issue 989 by percival.music.ca: ensure that no information about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989

As Han-Wen pointed out, we shouldn't be holding back a release for any undocumented 2.13-only features. I've therefore made a separate issue 1217 for taking care of that.

This issue is now about features present in 2.12.3 only -- we will not have a stable release until any relevant information in the 2.12.3 regtests is in the documentation.


(I know that some people might feel strongly that "undocumented new features" is a reason to delay a release... frankly, I feel the same way, and after 2.14.0 is out, I'm going to propose that this become an official release-blocking condition. However, it doesn't match our traditional release-blocking condition, and I don't feel justified in changing the rules at this stage in the release.)


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to