Am 20.08.2015 um 09:41 schrieb Phil Holmes:
For trivially small examples (like this is) I think most people find
it far easier to comment if you post the code in line, rather than as
an attachment. I certainly do.
I just recalled this remark of yours and wanted to reply to it.
I’ve taken a hab
Am 20.08.2015 um 07:29 schrieb David Kastrup:
Simon Albrecht writes:
Hello,
I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there
is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen
with -1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear
in any rea
Simon Albrecht wrote Thursday, August 20, 2015 1:11 AM
> I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there
> is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen with
> -1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear in any
> realistic scenari
Kevin Barry writes:
> Tinkering with your example seems to suggest that any value that is
> larger than the time signature will produce the unwanted behaviour.
>
> That is, if you set the Timing.measurePosition to anything bigger than
> the normal size of a bar in the current time signature, the
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Hello,
>
> I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there
> is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen
> with -1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear
> in any realistic scenario. Just ignore it?
>
> Y
Tinkering with your example seems to suggest that any value that is
larger than the time signature will produce the unwanted behaviour.
That is, if you set the Timing.measurePosition to anything bigger than
the normal size of a bar in the current time signature, the beam
before the override is bro
"Simon Albrecht" wrote in message
news:55d51b39.2010...@mail.de...
I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there
is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen with
-1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear in any
realistic scena
Hello,
I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there
is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen with
-1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear in any
realistic scenario. Just ignore it?
Yours, Simon
\version "2.19.23"
\r
