Simon Albrecht wrote Thursday, August 20, 2015 1:11 AM > I don’t quite know what I’m supposed to think of this: With 3/4, there > is no beam between the third and fourth quavers. It doesn’t happen with > -1/4, 0, 1/4, or 2/4. Doesn’t seem like this is going to appear in any > realistic scenario. Just ignore it?
Automatic beams which are created using beamExceptions are triggered when the beam end points are passed. Skipping the end point like this means beam creation is not triggered. I think just ignore it. If anyone wants to do this it's easy to add a manual beam. Trevor _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
