On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:03:26 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/28 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > There should be no "if I remember", because you added a .png
> > showing the bug when you added the initial report. Right? Right?
>
> Aah, nice to see you too,
2008/9/28 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There should be no "if I remember", because you added a .png
> showing the bug when you added the initial report. Right? Right?
Aah, nice to see you too, Graham ;-)
> Always assume that the bug won't be fixed for over a year and so
> you won't be
2008/9/28 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Can someone update the documentation?
Ok, updated:
"If set, main notes are spaced normally, then grace notes are put left
of the musical columns fot the main notes."
Is it better now?
Cheers,
Valentin
_
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Zoltan Selyem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, in Appendix B (B.13 Layout properties) the following is
> written about strict-grace-spacing:
> "If set, grace notes are not spaced separately, but put before
> musical columns."
>
> I'm not sure about the meaning
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Valentin Villenave wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=577
What makes it look bad to you?
In the Notation Reference (section 1.2.6.1 Grace notes) it says
that "Grace notes may be forced to align with regular notes in
other staves".
But if ragged-r
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:24:21 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/28 Zoltan Selyem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=577
> >
> > But the output still doesn't look good to me.
> > I don't want to offend anybody, please tell me i
2008/9/28 Zoltan Selyem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=577
>
> But the output still doesn't look good to me.
> I don't want to offend anybody, please tell me if I am wrong.
What makes it look bad to you? If i remember correctly, the bug was
that it cause
Hello,
Allegedly this bug has been fixed:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=577
But the output still doesn't look good to me.
I don't want to offend anybody, please tell me if I am wrong.
Oh, I am using LilyPond on a Windows XP.
Zoltan
%% Lilypond code %
