On 2019-03-23 5:46 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Hi Aaron,
I know it would be great to see my code, but the quartet is 11,000
lines
long and that's only half, and my library of which I use everything is
13,000 lines of code (for all the New Complexity stuff). I would never
expect anybody to go thr
Here it is:
Using tupletFullLengthToNote = ##t crashes it.
\version "2.19.82"
\paper { indent = 0 ragged-right = ##t }
\layout {
\set tupletFullLength = ##t
\set tupletFullLengthNote = ##t
}
{ \tuplet 1/1 { b'1 } \break 4 }
That qualifies as a bug worth registering, does it not?
Andrew
_
Hi Aaron,
I know it would be great to see my code, but the quartet is 11,000 lines
long and that's only half, and my library of which I use everything is
13,000 lines of code (for all the New Complexity stuff). I would never
expect anybody to go through it, let alone set it all up for compiling.
On 2019-03-23 3:39 pm, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Sa., 23. März 2019 um 21:41 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill
:
\override TupletBracket.X-positions = #(lambda (grob)
(let ((xpos (ly:tuplet-bracket::calc-x-positions grob)))
(if (> (car xpos) (cdr xpos))
(format #t "\nwarning: Inv
Am Sa., 23. März 2019 um 21:41 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill
:
>
> On 2019-03-23 6:46 am, Andrew Bernard wrote:
> > What calls calc_x_offset for Tuplet Number?
>
> This likely may be coming from Scheme. If you look at the Internals
> reference, you will see that the X-offset property for TupletNumber is
On 2019-03-23 6:46 am, Andrew Bernard wrote:
What calls calc_x_offset for Tuplet Number?
This likely may be coming from Scheme. If you look at the Internals
reference, you will see that the X-offset property for TupletNumber is
by default set to ly:tuplet-number::calc-x-offset.
That means
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2015-03-31 16:54 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
> > Am 31.03.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> >>
> >> "Leo Naab" wrote in message
> >> news:loom.20150331t133343-...@post.gmane.org...
>
> >>> I have a special lilypond file with let's lilypon
2015-03-31 16:54 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
> Am 31.03.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Phil Holmes:
>>
>> "Leo Naab" wrote in message
>> news:loom.20150331t133343-...@post.gmane.org...
I'm not top posting.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a special lilypond file with let's lilypond.exe crash. The file
>>> works
Am 31.03.2015 um 14:59 schrieb Phil Holmes:
"Leo Naab" wrote in message
news:loom.20150331t133343-...@post.gmane.org...
I'm not top posting.
I have a special lilypond file with let's lilypond.exe crash. The
file works
fine with version 2.19.15, but not with 2.19.17.
The crash has do to wit
"Leo Naab" wrote in message
news:loom.20150331t133343-...@post.gmane.org...
I'm not top posting.
I have a special lilypond file with let's lilypond.exe crash. The file
works
fine with version 2.19.15, but not with 2.19.17.
The crash has do to with a "\new Lyric" line. "\new Lyric" in \conte
On Mon 14 Feb 2011, 13:04 Francisco Vila wrote:
> > just an empty markuplines before the music,
> >
> > \markuplines { }
> > { c' }
> >
> >
> > I don't know where the chinese character came from. Did I pasted by
> > mistake?
>
> No, I didn't:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2011
2011/2/14 Francisco Vila :
> 2011/2/14 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
>> On Mon 14 Feb 2011, 12:47 Francisco Vila wrote:
>>> 2011/2/14 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
>>> >> This crashes 2.13.49 when { } is empty
>>> >>
>>> >> \markuplines{ �}
>>> >> { c' }
>>> > It doesn't crash in 2.13.50 for me.
>>>
>>> I have compile
2011/2/14 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
> On Mon 14 Feb 2011, 12:47 Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2011/2/14 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
>> >> This crashes 2.13.49 when { } is empty
>> >>
>> >> \markuplines{ �}
>> >> { c' }
>> > It doesn't crash in 2.13.50 for me.
>>
>> I have compiled 2.13.51 and it says segmentation fau
On Mon 14 Feb 2011, 12:47 Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/2/14 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
> >> This crashes 2.13.49 when { } is empty
> >>
> >> \markuplines{ 爙
> >> { c' }
> > It doesn't crash in 2.13.50 for me.
>
> I have compiled 2.13.51 and it says segmentation fault with this code.
Which code, please?
2011/2/14 Dmytro O. Redchuk :
>> This crashes 2.13.49 when { } is empty
>>
>> \markuplines{ �}
>> { c' }
> It doesn't crash in 2.13.50 for me.
I have compiled 2.13.51 and it says segmentation fault with this code.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
_
On Mon 14 Feb 2011, 09:35 Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/2/13 Beat Stoecklin :
> > The following Code produces a Crash on my Win XP
> >
> > BTW: \markuplines should be storable in a Variable.
>
> It is, but not in 2.12
>
> This crashes 2.13.49 when { } is empty
>
> \markuplines{ }
> { c' }
It doe
2011/2/13 Beat Stoecklin :
> The following Code produces a Crash on my Win XP
>
> BTW: \markuplines should be storable in a Variable.
It is, but not in 2.12
This crashes 2.13.49 when { } is empty
\markuplines{ }
{ c' }
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
_
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 05:22:47PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >I hope that you're using the probably-not-really-documented
> >\bookpart{} as appropriate (i.e. for each movement, or anything that
> >you know should start on a new page). That will save a lot of
> >processing power and/or memory.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond crash
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
Mine is actually a \book, so isn't a ginormous long piece of music.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Mine is actually a \book, so isn't a ginormous long piece of music.
I hope that you're using the probably-not-really-documented
\bookpart{} as appropriate (i.e. for each movement, or anything that
you know should start on a new page). That wi
"Valentin Villenave" wrote in message
news:aanlkti=nvwxnnf8hctjugidtwyt6cg55efhrnz5ws...@mail.gmail.com...
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:24 PM, James Lowe
wrote:
"...It can run on any platform, no matter how old or exotic, has thousands
of users and hundreds of contributors, and makes it possible
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 11:24 PM, James Lowe wrote:
> "...It can run on any platform, no matter how old or exotic, has thousands of
> users and hundreds of contributors, and makes it possible to write simple
> scores (a couple of hours is all it takes to get started) as well as complex
> 500-pa
Hello
-Original Message-
From: bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Phil
Holmes
Sent: Sat 09/10/2010 14:17
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Lilypond crash
Does anyone know what's the biggest single score compiled with LilyPond?
I've done
"Valentin Villenave" wrote in message
news:aanlkti=g-fc4pwacvog0owgb79mbacoms-18rcwbj...@mail.gmail.com...
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
well, i came across this problem while creating a *real-world* score,
having
1600+ bars and using GBs of memory. it also showed horrib
"Valentin Villenave" wrote in message
news:aanlktim_zs=onfovmhv_2du_1zfh0kwumfe+swd3a...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
The other issue is - all these test cases with multiple repeats are
artificial - the real question is - does it do long _real_ scores?
hi, i used ubuntu, machines with 2 or 4 GB RAM resp.
have to use minimal-breaking would be very disappointing...
actually i just wanted to inform that some things not only happen in
extreme artificial test cases... and that this breaking thing seems pretty
much suboptimal in both optical res
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Arno Waschk wrote:
> well, i came across this problem while creating a *real-world* score, having
> 1600+ bars and using GBs of memory. it also showed horrible "compiling"
> times before Joe created his patches as well. while experimenting a bit with
> it, i could
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> The other issue is - all these test cases with multiple repeats are
> artificial - the real question is - does it do long _real_ scores?
I always had the feeling (though nothing to document it) that LilyPond
is much better at compiling real-wo
- Original Message -
From: "Valentin Villenave"
How interesting. Of course, LilyPond-win being a 32-bit app, it
shouldn't be able to use more than roughly 3.6 GB anyway. (Or is it
just up to the OS?)
You're probably right. In practice, it never gets anywhere near that.
As for the
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> On 12.2.3 it will process 1150 repeats, but not 1200. On 12.13.35 1050 is
> OK, 1100 is not.
>
> I've attached a graph of how both use working set memory - it does appear to
> be related to trying to allocate a total of more than about 450 meg
"James Lowe" wrote in message
news:ee5ed9503d57144e895fa3d7533e9fd302408...@mail2...
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Phil
Holmes
Sent: Sun 03/10/2010 10:57
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Lilypond cr
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Phil
Holmes
Sent: Sun 03/10/2010 10:57
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Lilypond crash
I've attached a graph of how both use working set memory - it does appear to
be relat
Compiles here with LilyPond 2.13.35 on Linux (4G physical memory).
Compile time is 3'22, memory usage goes up to 1204,5 M.
Thomas
Original-Nachricht
Exploring the question of whether "random" music stresses Lilypond more than
repeated same code, I tried this:
\repeat unfol
"Graham Percival" wrote in message
news:20101002172122.ga22...@futoi...
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:02:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
On my Windows machine, Lilypond stops working at the "Preprocessing
graphical objects" stage. Might be an oddity of my PC and how I run
Lilypond, but don't recko
2010/10/2 Phil Holmes :
> Exploring the question of whether "random" music stresses Lilypond more than
> repeated same code, I tried this:
>
> \repeat unfold 2400 {
> c''4 c' c c,
> }
>
> On my Windows machine, Lilypond stops working at the "Preprocessing
> graphical objects" stage. Might be an o
"Graham Percival" wrote in message
news:20101002172122.ga22...@futoi...
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:02:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
On my Windows machine, Lilypond stops working at the "Preprocessing
graphical objects" stage. Might be an oddity of my PC and how I run
Lilypond, but don't recko
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:02:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> On my Windows machine, Lilypond stops working at the "Preprocessing
> graphical objects" stage. Might be an oddity of my PC and how I run
> Lilypond, but don't reckon it should.
Where does the cutoff seem to be? i.e. try 200, 400, 60
On Sat 03 Jul 2010, 21:04 James wrote:
> The example below causes a crash in LilyPond but not if
> you comment out \compressFullBarRests
Thank you, added as 1173:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1173
Sorry for delay .(
>
> MusicOne = {
> \time 3/4
> \compressFul
pkx166h wrote:
>
> However if I have 3 scores using 3 different time signatures (in this
> case 4/4, 2/2 and 3/4 why is it when I set my showLastLength as R1
> rather R2. do I get the crash? and only when using \score AND
> \compressfullbarrests - either one on their own doesn't have a pro
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 10:31:55AM +0100, James Lowe wrote:
> Ultimately I can live with using R2. but that's just a workaround and
> fundamentally we shouldn't be crashing.
Yes; any crash is a Critical issue.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
bug-lilypond mailin
pkx166h wrote:
>
> I am using Mac OS X 10.5.8 (if this matters)
>
>
> \version "2.13.21"
>
> This example below doesn't crash but doesn't
> %%% show last 2 full rests either
>
> \relative c {
> \time 3/4
> \compressFullBarRests
> R2.*11 \bar "||"
> }
>
> showLastLength = R1*2
hi,
i installed 2.3.13 on a separate hard drive last night and ran the same
crashing lilypond file.
it crashed there too, with slightly different output (i think?: no
"signal 6"). (using v. 2.3.13 on mac OS 10.3). the terminal output is
below. i forgot to install it with -keep-build-dir, but wil
- Open
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/text/lilypond-unstable.info with
the text editor of your choice.
i figured, since i'm using 2.2.6 (current stable) that i should change
the lilypond.info file in the /dists/stable/(etc.) file instead,
correct?
in that file i added the " --disable-op
On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:08 PM, Sean Reed wrote:
Can you repeat, but build without -O2 ?
do you mean run lilypond with the "-o" option?
or do you mean rebuild the whole of lilypond again? how do i build
without -O2?
- Open
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/text/lilypond-unstable.info with
the te
Can you repeat, but build without -O2 ?
do you mean run lilypond with the "-o" option?
or do you mean rebuild the whole of lilypond again? how do i build
without -O2?
(i didn't find that option anywhere in the fink man).
Please keep this discussion on the list.
(i assume you mean to send to bug-l
Hi,
Can you repeat, but build without -O2 ?
Please keep this discussion on the list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> hi matthias.
>
> i've rebuilt lilypond using the -keep-build-dir command and used the
> gdb commands as han-wen suggested. below you will find the terminal
> output of the gdb, a
I can't reproduce it (using 2.2.5 on Debian/testing). Can you send the
complete output of lilypond --verbose ?
Also, is it possible for you to see if the problem is still there in 2.2.6 or
2.3.x as well?
Erik
On Saturday 28 August 2004 18.14, Sean Reed wrote:
> dear lilypond bug control,
>
> b
47 matches
Mail list logo
