On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Arno Waschk <hamama...@gmx.de> wrote: > well, i came across this problem while creating a *real-world* score, having > 1600+ bars and using GBs of memory. it also showed horrible "compiling" > times before Joe created his patches as well. while experimenting a bit with > it, i could not find a significant difference between the real-world score, > and a \repeat unfold 1600+ fake score.
[I take it you forgot to include the list] Interesting. What operating system were you using? How much RAM? Also, one thing I probably should have mentioned is that the ly:minimal-breaking algorithm is often mandatory in such demanding compilations. Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
