On 3/27/11 7:37 AM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
>
> Frédéric Bron wrote Sunday, March 27, 2011 7:55 AM
>
>
>> I have built an exhaustive example showing the placement of all
>> objects. Maybe you could include it in lieu of the one that is
>> already
>> given and that has only a few of them.
hello
On 27 Mar 2011, at 14:37, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
> It could go in the Notation Reference with some introductory
> text, but I prefer Phil's suggestion to include this in the
> regression test suite.
Yes I think this could go as a reg test. It might be nice as an Appendix to the
NR but
>> Could this lead to undefined behavior? i.e. sometimes have TextScript
>> above MultiMeasureRestText and sometimes the contrary?
>
> Yes. I believe in this case it depends on the order
> in which they appear in the .ly file.
> What order would you like?
I have tried to inverse the order in the
Frédéric Bron wrote Sunday, March 27, 2011 3:49 PM
I have a remaining question: why have TextScript and
MultiMeasureRestText the same outside-staff-priority (450)?
A good question (meaning I don't know the answer :)
It could be that whoever chose the values couldn't decide
which should be hi
> It could go in the Notation Reference with some introductory
> text, but I prefer Phil's suggestion to include this in the
> regression test suite.
>
> However we choose to use it, many thanks for the contribution!
You are welcome.
I have a remaining question: why have TextScript and
MultiMeasu
Frédéric Bron wrote Sunday, March 27, 2011 7:55 AM
I have built an exhaustive example showing the placement of all
objects. Maybe you could include it in lieu of the one that is
already
given and that has only a few of them. This could help
understanding
for example what is a multimeasure r
I think it could be worth including this as a regtest?
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
"Frédéric Bron" wrote in message
news:AANLkTinkvD-LVYS4YNvSDN1Hj2-Su5Zpd8vQruVrGyP=@mail.gmail.com...
I've just made a more extensive change to the LM so it accords with the
new
behaviour in 2.13.
Thanks for answ
> I've just made a more extensive change to the LM so it accords with the new
> behaviour in 2.13.
Thanks for answers. I have checked the new documentation for 2.13.55
and it corresponds to the output.
I have built an exhaustive example showing the placement of all
objects. Maybe you could includ
nd"
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: Placement of outside-staff objects: bug and behaviour
changebetween 2.12.3 and 2.13.54
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:bug-lilypond-bounces+james.lowe=datacore...
